// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z %s -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
namespace std { struct type_info; }
namespace dr1902 { // dr1902: 3.7
struct A {};
struct B {
B(A);
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
// expected-note@-2 {{candidate}}
#endif
B() = delete;
#if __cplusplus < 201103L
// expected-error@-2 {{extension}}
#endif
B(const B&) // expected-note {{deleted here}}
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
// expected-note@-2 {{candidate}}
#else
// expected-error@+2 {{extension}}
#endif
= delete;
operator A();
};
extern B b1;
B b2(b1); // expected-error {{call to deleted}}
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
// This is ambiguous, even though calling the B(const B&) constructor would
// both directly and indirectly call a deleted function.
B b({}); // expected-error {{ambiguous}}
#endif
}
namespace dr1903 {
namespace A {
struct a {};
int a;
namespace B {
int b;
}
using namespace B;
namespace {
int c;
}
namespace D {
int d;
}
using D::d;
}
namespace X {
using A::a;
using A::b;
using A::c;
using A::d;
struct a *p;
}
}
namespace dr1909 { // dr1909: yes
struct A {
template<typename T> struct A {}; // expected-error {{member 'A' has the same name as its class}}
};
struct B {
template<typename T> void B() {} // expected-error {{constructor cannot have a return type}}
};
struct C {
template<typename T> static int C; // expected-error {{member 'C' has the same name as its class}} expected-error 0-1{{extension}}
};
struct D {
template<typename T> using D = int; // expected-error {{member 'D' has the same name as its class}} expected-error 0-1{{extension}}
};
}
namespace dr1940 { // dr1940: yes
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
static union {
static_assert(true, ""); // ok
static_assert(false, ""); // expected-error {{static_assert failed}}
};
#endif
}
namespace dr1941 { // dr1941: 3.9
#if __cplusplus >= 201402L
template<typename X>
struct base {
template<typename T>
base(T a, T b, decltype(void(*T()), 0) = 0) {
while (a != b) (void)*a++;
}
template<typename T>
base(T a, X x, decltype(void(T(0) * 1), 0) = 0) {
for (T n = 0; n != a; ++n) (void)X(x);
}
};
struct derived : base<int> {
using base::base;
};
struct iter {
iter operator++(int);
int operator*();
friend bool operator!=(iter, iter);
} it, end;
derived d1(it, end);
derived d2(42, 9);
#endif
}
namespace dr1947 { // dr1947: yes
#if __cplusplus >= 201402L
unsigned o = 0'01; // ok
unsigned b = 0b'01; // expected-error {{invalid digit 'b' in octal constant}}
unsigned x = 0x'01; // expected-error {{invalid suffix 'x'01' on integer constant}}
#endif
}
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
// dr1948: yes
// FIXME: This diagnostic could be improved.
void *operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__) noexcept { return nullptr; } // expected-error{{exception specification in declaration does not match previous declaration}}
#endif
namespace dr1959 { // dr1959: 3.9
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
struct b;
struct c;
struct a {
a() = default;
a(const a &) = delete; // expected-note 2{{deleted}}
a(const b &) = delete; // not inherited
a(c &&) = delete; // expected-note {{deleted}}
template<typename T> a(T) = delete;
};
struct b : a { // expected-note {{copy constructor of 'b' is implicitly deleted because base class 'dr1959::a' has a deleted copy constructor}}
using a::a;
};
a x;
b y = x; // expected-error {{deleted}}
b z = z; // expected-error {{deleted}}
// FIXME: It's not really clear that this matches the intent, but it's
// consistent with the behavior for assignment operators.
struct c : a {
using a::a;
c(const c &);
};
c q(static_cast<c&&>(q)); // expected-error {{call to deleted}}
#endif
}
namespace dr1968 { // dr1968: yes
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
static_assert(&typeid(int) == &typeid(int), ""); // expected-error{{not an integral constant expression}}
#endif
}
namespace dr1991 { // dr1991: 3.9
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
struct A {
A(int, int) = delete;
};
struct B : A {
using A::A;
B(int, int, int = 0);
};
// FIXME: As a resolution to an open DR against P0136R1, we treat derived
// class constructors as better than base class constructors in the presence
// of ambiguity.
B b(0, 0); // ok, calls B constructor
#endif
}
// dr1994: dup 529