This is ../../../doc/bison.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.13 from
../../../doc/bison.texi.
This manual (9 December 2012) is for GNU Bison (version 2.7), the GNU
parser generator.
Copyright (C) 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
being "A GNU Manual," and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a)
below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
"GNU Free Documentation License."
(a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: "You have the freedom to copy and
modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF supports it in
developing GNU and promoting software freedom."
INFO-DIR-SECTION Software development
START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
* bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
File: bison.info, Node: Top, Next: Introduction, Up: (dir)
Bison
*****
This manual (9 December 2012) is for GNU Bison (version 2.7), the GNU
parser generator.
Copyright (C) 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
being "A GNU Manual," and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a)
below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
"GNU Free Documentation License."
(a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: "You have the freedom to copy and
modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF supports it in
developing GNU and promoting software freedom."
* Menu:
* Introduction::
* Conditions::
* Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
how you can copy and share Bison.
Tutorial sections:
* Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
* Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
Reference sections:
* Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
* Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function `yyparse'.
* Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
* Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
* Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
* Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
* Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
* Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
* FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
* Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
* Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
* Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
* Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
* Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
--- The Detailed Node Listing ---
The Concepts of Bison
* Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
as mathematical ideas.
* Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
* Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
a semantic value (the value of an integer,
the name of an identifier, etc.).
* Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
* GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
* Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
* Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
how is the output used?
* Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
* Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
Writing GLR Parsers
* Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
* Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
* GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
* Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
Examples
* RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
a first example with no operator precedence.
* Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
Operator precedence is introduced.
* Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
* Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @N and @$.
* Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
* Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
* Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
* Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
* Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
* Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
* Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
* Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
* Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
Grammar Rules for `rpcalc'
* Rpcalc Input::
* Rpcalc Line::
* Rpcalc Expr::
Location Tracking Calculator: `ltcalc'
* Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
* Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
* Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
Multi-Function Calculator: `mfcalc'
* Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
* Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
* Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
Bison Grammar Files
* Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
* Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
* Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
* Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
* Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
* Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
* Named References:: Using named references in actions.
* Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
* Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
Outline of a Bison Grammar
* Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
* Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
* Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
* Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
* Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
Defining Language Semantics
* Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
* Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
* Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
* Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
* Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
action in the middle of a rule.
Actions in Mid-Rule
* Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
* Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
* Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
Tracking Locations
* Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
* Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
* Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
Bison Declarations
* Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
* Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
* Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
* Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
* Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
* Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
* Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
* Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
* Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
* Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
* Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
* Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
* Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
* %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
* %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
Parser C-Language Interface
* Parser Function:: How to call `yyparse' and what it returns.
* Push Parser Function:: How to call `yypush_parse' and what it returns.
* Pull Parser Function:: How to call `yypull_parse' and what it returns.
* Parser Create Function:: How to call `yypstate_new' and what it returns.
* Parser Delete Function:: How to call `yypstate_delete' and what it returns.
* Lexical:: You must supply a function `yylex'
which reads tokens.
* Error Reporting:: You must supply a function `yyerror'.
* Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
* Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
native language.
The Lexical Analyzer Function `yylex'
* Calling Convention:: How `yyparse' calls `yylex'.
* Token Values:: How `yylex' must return the semantic value
of the token it has read.
* Token Locations:: How `yylex' must return the text location
(line number, etc.) of the token, if the
actions want that.
* Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
(*note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.).
The Bison Parser Algorithm
* Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
* Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
* Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
* Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
* Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
* Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
* Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
* Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
* Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
* Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
Operator Precedence
* Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
* Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
* Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
* How Precedence:: How they work.
* Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
Tuning LR
* LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
* Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
* LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
* Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
Handling Context Dependencies
* Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
* Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
* Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
error recovery rules must be written.
Debugging Your Parser
* Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
* Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
* Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
* Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
Tracing Your Parser
* Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
* Mfcalc Traces:: Extending `mfcalc' to support traces
* The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
Invoking Bison
* Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
in alphabetical order by short options.
* Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
* Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible `yylex' and `main'.
Parsers Written In Other Languages
* C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
* Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
C++ Parsers
* C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
* C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
* C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
* C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
* C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
* A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
C++ Location Values
* C++ position:: One point in the source file
* C++ location:: Two points in the source file
* User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
A Complete C++ Example
* Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
* Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
* Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
* Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
* Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
Java Parsers
* Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
* Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
* Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
* Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
* Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
* Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
* Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
* Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
Frequently Asked Questions
* Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
* How Can I Reset the Parser:: `yyparse' Keeps some State
* Strings are Destroyed:: `yylval' Loses Track of Strings
* Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
* Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
* Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
* I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
* Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
* Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
* More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
* Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
* Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
Copying This Manual
* Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
File: bison.info, Node: Introduction, Next: Conditions, Prev: Top, Up: Top
Introduction
************
"Bison" is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
calculators to complex programming languages.
Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar with
Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need to be
fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to understand
this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental feature.
We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
of Bison in detail.
Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman
made it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
`THANKS' and `ChangeLog' files included in the Bison distribution.
This edition corresponds to version 2.7 of Bison.
File: bison.info, Node: Conditions, Next: Copying, Prev: Introduction, Up: Top
Conditions for Using Bison
**************************
The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1) parsers in
C. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated parsers could be
used only in programs that were free software.
The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C compiler, have
never had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
License to all of the Bison source code.
The main output of the Bison utility--the Bison parser implementation
file--contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most of
the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied the
GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation, the
effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
make software proprietary. *Software should be free.* But we
concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
using the other GNU tools.
This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
inspecting the file for text beginning with "As a special
exception...". The text spells out the exact terms of the exception.
File: bison.info, Node: Copying, Next: Concepts, Prev: Conditions, Up: Top
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
**************************
Version 3, 29 June 2007
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. `http://fsf.org/'
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Preamble
========
The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software
and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed
to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast,
the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to
share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains
free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use
the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies
also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply
it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you
these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you
have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software,
or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive
or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they
know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps:
(1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License
giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains
that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and
authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as
changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to
authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run
modified versions of the software inside them, although the
manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the
aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The
systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for
individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable.
Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the
practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in
other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains
in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of
users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents.
States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of
software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to
avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could
make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that
patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
modification follow.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
====================
0. Definitions.
"This License" refers to version 3 of the GNU General Public
License.
"Copyright" also means copyright-like laws that apply to other
kinds of works, such as semiconductor masks.
"The Program" refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this
License. Each licensee is addressed as "you". "Licensees" and
"recipients" may be individuals or organizations.
To "modify" a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the
work in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the
making of an exact copy. The resulting work is called a "modified
version" of the earlier work or a work "based on" the earlier work.
A "covered work" means either the unmodified Program or a work
based on the Program.
To "propagate" a work means to do anything with it that, without
permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for
infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it
on a computer or modifying a private copy. Propagation includes
copying, distribution (with or without modification), making
available to the public, and in some countries other activities as
well.
To "convey" a work means any kind of propagation that enables other
parties to make or receive copies. Mere interaction with a user
through a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not
conveying.
An interactive user interface displays "Appropriate Legal Notices"
to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently visible
feature that (1) displays an appropriate copyright notice, and (2)
tells the user that there is no warranty for the work (except to
the extent that warranties are provided), that licensees may
convey the work under this License, and how to view a copy of this
License. If the interface presents a list of user commands or
options, such as a menu, a prominent item in the list meets this
criterion.
1. Source Code.
The "source code" for a work means the preferred form of the work
for making modifications to it. "Object code" means any
non-source form of a work.
A "Standard Interface" means an interface that either is an
official standard defined by a recognized standards body, or, in
the case of interfaces specified for a particular programming
language, one that is widely used among developers working in that
language.
The "System Libraries" of an executable work include anything,
other than the work as a whole, that (a) is included in the normal
form of packaging a Major Component, but which is not part of that
Major Component, and (b) serves only to enable use of the work
with that Major Component, or to implement a Standard Interface
for which an implementation is available to the public in source
code form. A "Major Component", in this context, means a major
essential component (kernel, window system, and so on) of the
specific operating system (if any) on which the executable work
runs, or a compiler used to produce the work, or an object code
interpreter used to run it.
The "Corresponding Source" for a work in object code form means all
the source code needed to generate, install, and (for an executable
work) run the object code and to modify the work, including
scripts to control those activities. However, it does not include
the work's System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally
available free programs which are used unmodified in performing
those activities but which are not part of the work. For example,
Corresponding Source includes interface definition files
associated with source files for the work, and the source code for
shared libraries and dynamically linked subprograms that the work
is specifically designed to require, such as by intimate data
communication or control flow between those subprograms and other
parts of the work.
The Corresponding Source need not include anything that users can
regenerate automatically from other parts of the Corresponding
Source.
The Corresponding Source for a work in source code form is that
same work.
2. Basic Permissions.
All rights granted under this License are granted for the term of
copyright on the Program, and are irrevocable provided the stated
conditions are met. This License explicitly affirms your unlimited
permission to run the unmodified Program. The output from running
a covered work is covered by this License only if the output,
given its content, constitutes a covered work. This License
acknowledges your rights of fair use or other equivalent, as
provided by copyright law.
You may make, run and propagate covered works that you do not
convey, without conditions so long as your license otherwise
remains in force. You may convey covered works to others for the
sole purpose of having them make modifications exclusively for
you, or provide you with facilities for running those works,
provided that you comply with the terms of this License in
conveying all material for which you do not control copyright.
Those thus making or running the covered works for you must do so
exclusively on your behalf, under your direction and control, on
terms that prohibit them from making any copies of your
copyrighted material outside their relationship with you.
Conveying under any other circumstances is permitted solely under
the conditions stated below. Sublicensing is not allowed; section
10 makes it unnecessary.
3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law.
No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological
measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under
article 11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December
1996, or similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of
such measures.
When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid
circumvention of technological measures to the extent such
circumvention is effected by exercising rights under this License
with respect to the covered work, and you disclaim any intention
to limit operation or modification of the work as a means of
enforcing, against the work's users, your or third parties' legal
rights to forbid circumvention of technological measures.
4. Conveying Verbatim Copies.
You may convey verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you
receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and
appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice;
keep intact all notices stating that this License and any
non-permissive terms added in accord with section 7 apply to the
code; keep intact all notices of the absence of any warranty; and
give all recipients a copy of this License along with the Program.
You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey,
and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee.
5. Conveying Modified Source Versions.
You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to
produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the
terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these
conditions:
a. The work must carry prominent notices stating that you
modified it, and giving a relevant date.
b. The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is
released under this License and any conditions added under
section 7. This requirement modifies the requirement in
section 4 to "keep intact all notices".
c. You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this
License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy. This
License will therefore apply, along with any applicable
section 7 additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all
its parts, regardless of how they are packaged. This License
gives no permission to license the work in any other way, but
it does not invalidate such permission if you have separately
received it.
d. If the work has interactive user interfaces, each must display
Appropriate Legal Notices; however, if the Program has
interactive interfaces that do not display Appropriate Legal
Notices, your work need not make them do so.
A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent
works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered
work, and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger
program, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is
called an "aggregate" if the compilation and its resulting
copyright are not used to limit the access or legal rights of the
compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit.
Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this
License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate.
6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.
You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms
of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the
machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this
License, in one of these ways:
a. Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product
(including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by the
Corresponding Source fixed on a durable physical medium
customarily used for software interchange.
b. Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product
(including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by a
written offer, valid for at least three years and valid for
as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that
product model, to give anyone who possesses the object code
either (1) a copy of the Corresponding Source for all the
software in the product that is covered by this License, on a
durable physical medium customarily used for software
interchange, for a price no more than your reasonable cost of
physically performing this conveying of source, or (2) access
to copy the Corresponding Source from a network server at no
charge.
c. Convey individual copies of the object code with a copy of
the written offer to provide the Corresponding Source. This
alternative is allowed only occasionally and noncommercially,
and only if you received the object code with such an offer,
in accord with subsection 6b.
d. Convey the object code by offering access from a designated
place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access
to the Corresponding Source in the same way through the same
place at no further charge. You need not require recipients
to copy the Corresponding Source along with the object code.
If the place to copy the object code is a network server, the
Corresponding Source may be on a different server (operated
by you or a third party) that supports equivalent copying
facilities, provided you maintain clear directions next to
the object code saying where to find the Corresponding Source.
Regardless of what server hosts the Corresponding Source, you
remain obligated to ensure that it is available for as long
as needed to satisfy these requirements.
e. Convey the object code using peer-to-peer transmission,
provided you inform other peers where the object code and
Corresponding Source of the work are being offered to the
general public at no charge under subsection 6d.
A separable portion of the object code, whose source code is
excluded from the Corresponding Source as a System Library, need
not be included in conveying the object code work.
A "User Product" is either (1) a "consumer product", which means
any tangible personal property which is normally used for personal,
family, or household purposes, or (2) anything designed or sold for
incorporation into a dwelling. In determining whether a product
is a consumer product, doubtful cases shall be resolved in favor of
coverage. For a particular product received by a particular user,
"normally used" refers to a typical or common use of that class of
product, regardless of the status of the particular user or of the
way in which the particular user actually uses, or expects or is
expected to use, the product. A product is a consumer product
regardless of whether the product has substantial commercial,
industrial or non-consumer uses, unless such uses represent the
only significant mode of use of the product.
"Installation Information" for a User Product means any methods,
procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to
install and execute modified versions of a covered work in that
User Product from a modified version of its Corresponding Source.
The information must suffice to ensure that the continued
functioning of the modified object code is in no case prevented or
interfered with solely because modification has been made.
If you convey an object code work under this section in, or with,
or specifically for use in, a User Product, and the conveying
occurs as part of a transaction in which the right of possession
and use of the User Product is transferred to the recipient in
perpetuity or for a fixed term (regardless of how the transaction
is characterized), the Corresponding Source conveyed under this
section must be accompanied by the Installation Information. But
this requirement does not apply if neither you nor any third party
retains the ability to install modified object code on the User
Product (for example, the work has been installed in ROM).
The requirement to provide Installation Information does not
include a requirement to continue to provide support service,
warranty, or updates for a work that has been modified or
installed by the recipient, or for the User Product in which it
has been modified or installed. Access to a network may be denied
when the modification itself materially and adversely affects the
operation of the network or violates the rules and protocols for
communication across the network.
Corresponding Source conveyed, and Installation Information
provided, in accord with this section must be in a format that is
publicly documented (and with an implementation available to the
public in source code form), and must require no special password
or key for unpacking, reading or copying.
7. Additional Terms.
"Additional permissions" are terms that supplement the terms of
this License by making exceptions from one or more of its
conditions. Additional permissions that are applicable to the
entire Program shall be treated as though they were included in
this License, to the extent that they are valid under applicable
law. If additional permissions apply only to part of the Program,
that part may be used separately under those permissions, but the
entire Program remains governed by this License without regard to
the additional permissions.
When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option
remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part
of it. (Additional permissions may be written to require their own
removal in certain cases when you modify the work.) You may place
additional permissions on material, added by you to a covered work,
for which you have or can give appropriate copyright permission.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, for material
you add to a covered work, you may (if authorized by the copyright
holders of that material) supplement the terms of this License
with terms:
a. Disclaiming warranty or limiting liability differently from
the terms of sections 15 and 16 of this License; or
b. Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices
or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate
Legal Notices displayed by works containing it; or
c. Prohibiting misrepresentation of the origin of that material,
or requiring that modified versions of such material be
marked in reasonable ways as different from the original
version; or
d. Limiting the use for publicity purposes of names of licensors
or authors of the material; or
e. Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some
trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or
f. Requiring indemnification of licensors and authors of that
material by anyone who conveys the material (or modified
versions of it) with contractual assumptions of liability to
the recipient, for any liability that these contractual
assumptions directly impose on those licensors and authors.
All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further
restrictions" within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as
you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that
it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further
restriction, you may remove that term. If a license document
contains a further restriction but permits relicensing or
conveying under this License, you may add to a covered work
material governed by the terms of that license document, provided
that the further restriction does not survive such relicensing or
conveying.
If you add terms to a covered work in accord with this section, you
must place, in the relevant source files, a statement of the
additional terms that apply to those files, or a notice indicating
where to find the applicable terms.
Additional terms, permissive or non-permissive, may be stated in
the form of a separately written license, or stated as exceptions;
the above requirements apply either way.
8. Termination.
You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly
provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to propagate or
modify it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights
under this License (including any patent licenses granted under
the third paragraph of section 11).
However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your
license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a)
provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly
and finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the
copyright holder fails to notify you of the violation by some
reasonable means prior to 60 days after the cessation.
Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is
reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the
violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have
received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from
that copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days
after your receipt of the notice.
Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate
the licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from
you under this License. If your rights have been terminated and
not permanently reinstated, you do not qualify to receive new
licenses for the same material under section 10.
9. Acceptance Not Required for Having Copies.
You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or
run a copy of the Program. Ancillary propagation of a covered work
occurring solely as a consequence of using peer-to-peer
transmission to receive a copy likewise does not require
acceptance. However, nothing other than this License grants you
permission to propagate or modify any covered work. These actions
infringe copyright if you do not accept this License. Therefore,
by modifying or propagating a covered work, you indicate your
acceptance of this License to do so.
10. Automatic Licensing of Downstream Recipients.
Each time you convey a covered work, the recipient automatically
receives a license from the original licensors, to run, modify and
propagate that work, subject to this License. You are not
responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties with this
License.
An "entity transaction" is a transaction transferring control of an
organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an
organization, or merging organizations. If propagation of a
covered work results from an entity transaction, each party to that
transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever
licenses to the work the party's predecessor in interest had or
could give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to
possession of the Corresponding Source of the work from the
predecessor in interest, if the predecessor has it or can get it
with reasonable efforts.
You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the
rights granted or affirmed under this License. For example, you
may not impose a license fee, royalty, or other charge for
exercise of rights granted under this License, and you may not
initiate litigation (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a
lawsuit) alleging that any patent claim is infringed by making,
using, selling, offering for sale, or importing the Program or any
portion of it.
11. Patents.
A "contributor" is a copyright holder who authorizes use under this
License of the Program or a work on which the Program is based.
The work thus licensed is called the contributor's "contributor
version".
A contributor's "essential patent claims" are all patent claims
owned or controlled by the contributor, whether already acquired or
hereafter acquired, that would be infringed by some manner,
permitted by this License, of making, using, or selling its
contributor version, but do not include claims that would be
infringed only as a consequence of further modification of the
contributor version. For purposes of this definition, "control"
includes the right to grant patent sublicenses in a manner
consistent with the requirements of this License.
Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide,
royalty-free patent license under the contributor's essential
patent claims, to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and
otherwise run, modify and propagate the contents of its
contributor version.
In the following three paragraphs, a "patent license" is any
express agreement or commitment, however denominated, not to
enforce a patent (such as an express permission to practice a
patent or covenant not to sue for patent infringement). To
"grant" such a patent license to a party means to make such an
agreement or commitment not to enforce a patent against the party.
If you convey a covered work, knowingly relying on a patent
license, and the Corresponding Source of the work is not available
for anyone to copy, free of charge and under the terms of this
License, through a publicly available network server or other
readily accessible means, then you must either (1) cause the
Corresponding Source to be so available, or (2) arrange to deprive
yourself of the benefit of the patent license for this particular
work, or (3) arrange, in a manner consistent with the requirements
of this License, to extend the patent license to downstream
recipients. "Knowingly relying" means you have actual knowledge
that, but for the patent license, your conveying the covered work
in a country, or your recipient's use of the covered work in a
country, would infringe one or more identifiable patents in that
country that you have reason to believe are valid.
If, pursuant to or in connection with a single transaction or
arrangement, you convey, or propagate by procuring conveyance of, a
covered work, and grant a patent license to some of the parties
receiving the covered work authorizing them to use, propagate,
modify or convey a specific copy of the covered work, then the
patent license you grant is automatically extended to all
recipients of the covered work and works based on it.
A patent license is "discriminatory" if it does not include within
the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is
conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that
are specifically granted under this License. You may not convey a
covered work if you are a party to an arrangement with a third
party that is in the business of distributing software, under
which you make payment to the third party based on the extent of
your activity of conveying the work, and under which the third
party grants, to any of the parties who would receive the covered
work from you, a discriminatory patent license (a) in connection
with copies of the covered work conveyed by you (or copies made
from those copies), or (b) primarily for and in connection with
specific products or compilations that contain the covered work,
unless you entered into that arrangement, or that patent license
was granted, prior to 28 March 2007.
Nothing in this License shall be construed as excluding or limiting
any implied license or other defenses to infringement that may
otherwise be available to you under applicable patent law.
12. No Surrender of Others' Freedom.
If conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order,
agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this
License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this
License. If you cannot convey a covered work so as to satisfy
simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other
pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not convey it
at all. For example, if you agree to terms that obligate you to
collect a royalty for further conveying from those to whom you
convey the Program, the only way you could satisfy both those
terms and this License would be to refrain entirely from conveying
the Program.
13. Use with the GNU Affero General Public License.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, you have
permission to link or combine any covered work with a work licensed
under version 3 of the GNU Affero General Public License into a
single combined work, and to convey the resulting work. The terms
of this License will continue to apply to the part which is the
covered work, but the special requirements of the GNU Affero
General Public License, section 13, concerning interaction through
a network will apply to the combination as such.
14. Revised Versions of this License.
The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new
versions of the GNU General Public License from time to time.
Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present
version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or
concerns.
Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the
Program specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU
General Public License "or any later version" applies to it, you
have the option of following the terms and conditions either of
that numbered version or of any later version published by the
Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a
version number of the GNU General Public License, you may choose
any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation.
If the Program specifies that a proxy can decide which future
versions of the GNU General Public License can be used, that
proxy's public statement of acceptance of a version permanently
authorizes you to choose that version for the Program.
Later license versions may give you additional or different
permissions. However, no additional obligations are imposed on any
author or copyright holder as a result of your choosing to follow a
later version.
15. Disclaimer of Warranty.
THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY
APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE
COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS"
WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE
RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU.
SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL
NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
16. Limitation of Liability.
IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN
WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MODIFIES
AND/OR CONVEYS THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE
THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA
BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD
PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER
PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
17. Interpretation of Sections 15 and 16.
If the disclaimer of warranty and limitation of liability provided
above cannot be given local legal effect according to their terms,
reviewing courts shall apply local law that most closely
approximates an absolute waiver of all civil liability in
connection with the Program, unless a warranty or assumption of
liability accompanies a copy of the Program in return for a fee.
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
===========================
How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs
=============================================
If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest
possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these
terms.
To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest
to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively
state the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least the
"copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.
ONE LINE TO GIVE THE PROGRAM'S NAME AND A BRIEF IDEA OF WHAT IT DOES.
Copyright (C) YEAR NAME OF AUTHOR
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at
your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see `http://www.gnu.org/licenses/'.
Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper
mail.
If the program does terminal interaction, make it output a short
notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
PROGRAM Copyright (C) YEAR NAME OF AUTHOR
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.
The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the
appropriate parts of the General Public License. Of course, your
program's commands might be different; for a GUI interface, you would
use an "about box".
You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or
school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if
necessary. For more information on this, and how to apply and follow
the GNU GPL, see `http://www.gnu.org/licenses/'.
The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your
program into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine
library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary
applications with the library. If this is what you want to do, use the
GNU Lesser General Public License instead of this License. But first,
please read `http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html'.
File: bison.info, Node: Concepts, Next: Examples, Prev: Copying, Up: Top
1 The Concepts of Bison
***********************
This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter
carefully.
* Menu:
* Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
as mathematical ideas.
* Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
* Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
a semantic value (the value of an integer,
the name of an identifier, etc.).
* Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
* GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
* Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
* Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
how is the output used?
* Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
* Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
File: bison.info, Node: Language and Grammar, Next: Grammar in Bison, Up: Concepts
1.1 Languages and Context-Free Grammars
=======================================
In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
"context-free grammar". This means that you specify one or more
"syntactic groupings" and give rules for constructing them from their
parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called
an `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, "An
expression can be made of a minus sign and another expression".
Another would be, "An expression can be an integer". As you can see,
rules are often recursive, but there must be at least one rule which
leads out of the recursion.
The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans
to read is "Backus-Naur Form" or "BNF", which was developed in order to
specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in BNF is a
context-free grammar. The input to Bison is essentially
machine-readable BNF.
There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars.
Although it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is
optimized for what are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these
grammars, it must be possible to tell how to parse any portion of an
input string with just a single token of lookahead. For historical
reasons, Bison by default is limited by the additional restrictions of
LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply. *Note Mysterious
Conflicts::, for more information on this. As an experimental feature,
you can escape these additional restrictions by requesting IELR(1) or
canonical LR(1) parser tables. *Note LR Table Construction::, to learn
how.
Parsers for LR(1) grammars are "deterministic", meaning roughly that
the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is uniquely
determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion (called a
"lookahead") of the remaining input. A context-free grammar can be
"ambiguous", meaning that there are multiple ways to apply the grammar
rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous grammars can be
"nondeterministic", meaning that no fixed lookahead always suffices to
determine the next grammar rule to apply. With the proper
declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more general
context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR parsing (for
Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers are able to handle any
context-free grammar for which the number of possible parses of any
given string is finite.
In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of
syntactic unit or grouping is named by a "symbol". Those which are
built by grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are
called "nonterminal symbols"; those which can't be subdivided are called
"terminal symbols" or "token types". We call a piece of input
corresponding to a single terminal symbol a "token", and a piece
corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a "grouping".
We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
`identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
`char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
(These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
lexicography, not grammar.)
Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
int /* keyword `int' */
square (int x) /* identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',
identifier, close-paren */
{ /* open-brace */
return x * x; /* keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,
identifier, semicolon */
} /* close-brace */
The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement,
the declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in
the grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
`declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens
of additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal
symbol, in order to express the meanings of these four. The example
above is a function definition; it contains one declaration, and one
statement. In the statement, each `x' is an expression and so is `x *
x'.
Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it
is made out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C
statement is the `return' statement; this would be described with a
grammar rule which reads informally as follows:
A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression'
and a `semicolon'.
There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
statement in C.
One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the "start
symbol". In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and
declarations' plays this role.
For example, `1 + 2' is a valid C expression--a valid part of a C
program--but it is not valid as an _entire_ C program. In the
context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression'
is not the start symbol.
The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups
the tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end
result is that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping
whose symbol is the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C,
the entire input must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'.
If not, the parser reports a syntax error.
File: bison.info, Node: Grammar in Bison, Next: Semantic Values, Prev: Language and Grammar, Up: Concepts
1.2 From Formal Rules to Bison Input
====================================
A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
a "Bison grammar" file. *Note Bison Grammar Files: Grammar File.
A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison
input as an identifier, like an identifier in C. By convention, it
should be in lower case, such as `expr', `stmt' or `declaration'.
The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a
"token type". Token types as well can be represented as C-like
identifiers. By convention, these identifiers should be upper case to
distinguish them from nonterminals: for example, `INTEGER',
`IDENTIFIER', `IF' or `RETURN'. A terminal symbol that stands for a
particular keyword in the language should be named after that keyword
converted to upper case. The terminal symbol `error' is reserved for
error recovery. *Note Symbols::.
A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal,
just like a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token
is just a single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that
same character in a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string
constant containing several characters. *Note Symbols::, for more
information.
The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For
example, here is the Bison rule for a C `return' statement. The
semicolon in quotes is a literal character token, representing part of
the C syntax for the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are
Bison punctuation used in every rule.
stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
*Note Syntax of Grammar Rules: Rules.
File: bison.info, Node: Semantic Values, Next: Semantic Actions, Prev: Grammar in Bison, Up: Concepts
1.3 Semantic Values
===================
A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for
example, if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it
means that _any_ integer constant is grammatically valid in that
position. The precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to
parse the input: if `x+4' is grammatical then `x+1' or `x+3989' is
equally grammatical.
But the precise value is very important for what the input means
once it is parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish
between 4, 1 and 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each
token in a Bison grammar has both a token type and a "semantic value".
*Note Defining Language Semantics: Semantics, for details.
The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
`INTEGER', `IDENTIFIER' or `',''. It tells everything you need to know
to decide where the token may validly appear and how to group it with
other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens except their
types.
The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
identifier. (A token such as `','' which is just punctuation doesn't
need to have any semantic value.)
For example, an input token might be classified as token type
`INTEGER' and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
have the same token type `INTEGER' but value 3989. When a grammar rule
says that `INTEGER' is allowed, either of these tokens is acceptable
because each is an `INTEGER'. When the parser accepts the token, it
keeps track of the token's semantic value.
Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its
nonterminal symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression
typically has a semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a
programming language, an expression typically has a semantic value that
is a tree structure describing the meaning of the expression.
File: bison.info, Node: Semantic Actions, Next: GLR Parsers, Prev: Semantic Values, Up: Concepts
1.4 Semantic Actions
====================
In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a
grammar rule can have an "action" made up of C statements. Each time
the parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
*Note Actions::.
Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the
semantic value of the whole construct from the semantic values of its
parts. For example, suppose we have a rule which says an expression
can be the sum of two expressions. When the parser recognizes such a
sum, each of the subexpressions has a semantic value which describes
how it was built up. The action for this rule should create a similar
sort of value for the newly recognized larger expression.
For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
two subexpressions:
expr: expr '+' expr { $$ = $1 + $3; } ;
The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
from the values of the two subexpressions.
File: bison.info, Node: GLR Parsers, Next: Locations, Prev: Semantic Actions, Up: Concepts
1.5 Writing GLR Parsers
=======================
In some grammars, Bison's deterministic LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot
decide whether to apply a certain grammar rule at a given point. That
is, it may not be able to decide (on the basis of the input read so
far) which of two possible reductions (applications of a grammar rule)
applies, or whether to apply a reduction or read more of the input and
apply a reduction later in the input. These are known respectively as
"reduce/reduce" conflicts (*note Reduce/Reduce::), and "shift/reduce"
conflicts (*note Shift/Reduce::).
To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a more
general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
`%glr-parser' among the Bison declarations in your file (*note Grammar
Outline::), the result is a Generalized LR (GLR) parser. These parsers
handle Bison grammars that contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after
applying precedence declarations) identically to deterministic parsers.
However, when faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce
conflicts, GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
identical set of symbols.
During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
merged result.
* Menu:
* Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
* Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
* GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
* Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
File: bison.info, Node: Simple GLR Parsers, Next: Merging GLR Parses, Up: GLR Parsers
1.5.1 Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
---------------------------------------
In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm to parse grammars
that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1). Such grammars typically
require more than one symbol of lookahead.
Consider a problem that arises in the declaration of enumerated and
subrange types in the programming language Pascal. Here are some
examples:
type subrange = lo .. hi;
type enum = (a, b, c);
The original language standard allows only numeric literals and
constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (`lo' and `hi'), but
Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC 10206) and many other Pascal implementations
allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives rise to the following
situation, containing a superfluous pair of parentheses:
type subrange = (a) .. b;
Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated type with
only one value:
type enum = (a);
(These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically valid,
and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
These two declarations look identical until the `..' token. With
normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not possible to decide between
the two forms when the identifier `a' is parsed. It is, however,
desirable for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case `a'
must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration value, while
in the former case `a' must be evaluated with its current meaning,
which may be a constant or even a function call.
You could parse `(a)' as an "unspecified identifier in parentheses",
to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the grammar,
where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for expressions.
You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and undefined
identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local scope, and `a'
is defined in an outer scope, then both forms are possible--either
locally redefining `a', or using the value of `a' from the outer scope.
So this approach cannot work.
A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to use
the GLR algorithm. When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
error. If there is a `..' token before the next `;', the rule for
enumerated types fails since it cannot accept `..' anywhere; otherwise,
the subrange type rule fails since it requires a `..' token. So one of
the branches fails silently, and the other one continues normally,
performing all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the
split.
If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the
parser reports a syntax error as usual.
The effect of all this is that the parser seems to "guess" the
correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows for. In
this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases that are not
LR(k) for any k can be handled this way.
In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space for
some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many grammars
it is possible to prove that it cannot happen. The present example
contains only one conflict between two rules, and the type-declaration
context containing the conflict cannot be nested. So the number of
branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2, and
the parsing time is still linear.
Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
%token TYPE DOTDOT ID
%left '+' '-'
%left '*' '/'
%%
type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
type:
'(' id_list ')'
| expr DOTDOT expr
;
id_list:
ID
| id_list ',' ID
;
expr:
'(' expr ')'
| expr '+' expr
| expr '-' expr
| expr '*' expr
| expr '/' expr
| ID
;
When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains about
one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the parser
chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one declared first.
Therefore the following correct input is not recognized:
type t = (a) .. b;
The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
`%%'):
%glr-parser
%expect-rr 1
No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the parser recognizes
all valid declarations, according to the limited syntax above,
transparently. In fact, the user does not even notice when the parser
splits.
So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR, almost
without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however, there
are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always analyze
the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR splitting is only
done where it is intended. A GLR parser splitting inadvertently may
cause problems less obvious than an LR parser statically choosing the
wrong alternative in a conflict. Second, consider interactions with
the lexer (*note Semantic Tokens::) with great care. Since a split
parser consumes tokens without performing any actions during the split,
the lexer cannot obtain information via parser actions. Some cases of
lexer interactions can be eliminated by using GLR to shift the
complications from the lexer to the parser. You must check the
remaining cases for correctness.
In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens
based on their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new
symbols are defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is
possible for a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are
parsed, before the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no
difference since they cannot be used within the same enumerated type
declaration.
File: bison.info, Node: Merging GLR Parses, Next: GLR Semantic Actions, Prev: Simple GLR Parsers, Up: GLR Parsers
1.5.2 Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
--------------------------------------
Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
%{
#include <stdio.h>
#define YYSTYPE char const *
int yylex (void);
void yyerror (char const *);
%}
%token TYPENAME ID
%right '='
%left '+'
%glr-parser
%%
prog:
/* Nothing. */
| prog stmt { printf ("\n"); }
;
stmt:
expr ';' %dprec 1
| decl %dprec 2
;
expr:
ID { printf ("%s ", $$); }
| TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); }
| expr '+' expr { printf ("+ "); }
| expr '=' expr { printf ("= "); }
;
decl:
TYPENAME declarator ';'
{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); }
| TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); }
;
declarator:
ID { printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); }
| '(' declarator ')'
;
This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar--the ambiguity between
certain declarations and statements. For example,
T (x) = y+z;
parses as either an `expr' or a `stmt' (assuming that `T' is recognized
as a `TYPENAME' and `x' as an `ID'). Bison detects this as a
reduce/reduce conflict between the rules `expr : ID' and `declarator :
ID', which it cannot resolve at the time it encounters `x' in the
example above. Since this is a GLR parser, it therefore splits the
problem into two parses, one for each choice of resolving the
reduce/reduce conflict. Unlike the example from the previous section
(*note Simple GLR Parsers::), however, neither of these parses "dies,"
because the grammar as it stands is ambiguous. One of the parsers
eventually reduces `stmt : expr ';'' and the other reduces `stmt :
decl', after which both parsers are in an identical state: they've seen
`prog stmt' and have the same unprocessed input remaining. We say that
these parses have "merged."
At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
grammar of how to choose between the competing parses. In the example
above, the two `%dprec' declarations specify that Bison is to give
precedence to the parse that interprets the example as a `decl', which
implies that `x' is a declarator. The parser therefore prints
"x" y z + T <init-declare>
The `%dprec' declarations only come into play when more than one
parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
T (x) + y;
This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous construct,
as shown in the previous section (*note Simple GLR Parsers::). Here,
there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
However, at the time the Bison parser encounters `x', it does not have
enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
between `x' as an `expr' or a `declarator'). In this case, no
precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits into two, one
assuming that `x' is an `expr', and the other assuming `x' is a
`declarator'. The second of these parsers then vanishes when it sees
`+', and the parser prints
x T <cast> y +
Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see
all the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
other. To do so, you could change the declaration of `stmt' as follows:
stmt:
expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
| decl %merge <stmtMerge>
;
and define the `stmtMerge' function as:
static YYSTYPE
stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
{
printf ("<OR> ");
return "";
}
with an accompanying forward declaration in the C declarations at the
beginning of the file:
%{
#define YYSTYPE char const *
static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
%}
With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
as both an `expr' and a `decl', and prints
"x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
Bison requires that all of the productions that participate in any
particular merge have identical `%merge' clauses. Otherwise, the
ambiguity would be unresolvable, and the parser will report an error
during any parse that results in the offending merge.
File: bison.info, Node: GLR Semantic Actions, Next: Compiler Requirements, Prev: Merging GLR Parses, Up: GLR Parsers
1.5.3 GLR Semantic Actions
--------------------------
By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same
time as the associated reduction. This raises caveats for several
Bison features you might use in a semantic action in a GLR parser.
In any semantic action, you can examine `yychar' to determine the
type of the lookahead token present at the time of the associated
reduction. After checking that `yychar' is not set to `YYEMPTY' or
`YYEOF', you can then examine `yylval' and `yylloc' to determine the
lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any. In a
nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables
to influence syntax analysis. *Note Lookahead Tokens: Lookahead.
In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax
analysis. In this case, `yychar', `yylval', and `yylloc' are set to
shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated
reduction. For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to
change with future versions of Bison. For example, if a semantic
action might be deferred, you should never write it to invoke
`yyclearin' (*note Action Features::) or to attempt to free memory
referenced by `yylval'.
Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is `YYERROR'
(*note Action Features::), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
initiate error recovery. During deterministic GLR operation, the
effect of `YYERROR' is the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
Also, see *note Default Action for Locations: Location Default
Action, which describes a special usage of `YYLLOC_DEFAULT' in GLR
parsers.
File: bison.info, Node: Compiler Requirements, Prev: GLR Semantic Actions, Up: GLR Parsers
1.5.4 Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
-----------------------------------------------
The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or later. In addition,
they use the `inline' keyword, which is not C89, but is C99 and is a
common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is up to the user of these
parsers to handle portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf
and the Autoconf macro `AC_C_INLINE', a mere
%{
#include <config.h>
%}
will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
%{
#if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
&& ! defined inline)
# define inline
#endif
%}
File: bison.info, Node: Locations, Next: Bison Parser, Prev: GLR Parsers, Up: Concepts
1.6 Locations
=============
Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce
verbose and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able
to keep track of the "textual location", or "location", of each
syntactic construct. Bison provides a mechanism for handling these
locations.
Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token
has an associated location, but the type of locations is the same for
all tokens and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with
a default data structure for storing locations (*note Tracking
Locations::, for more details).
Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a
dedicated set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the
whole grouping is `@$', while the locations of the subexpressions are
`@1' and `@3'.
When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the
semantic value of its left hand side (*note Actions::). In the same
way, another default action is used for locations. However, the action
for locations is general enough for most cases, meaning there is
usually no need to describe for each rule how `@$' should be formed.
When building a new location for a given grouping, the default behavior
of the output parser is to take the beginning of the first symbol, and
the end of the last symbol.
File: bison.info, Node: Bison Parser, Next: Stages, Prev: Locations, Up: Concepts
1.7 Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
================================================
When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a "Bison
parser", and this file is called a "Bison parser implementation file".
Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the Bison parser are two
distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program whose output is the
Bison parser implementation file that becomes part of your program.
The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings
according to the grammar rules--for example, to build identifiers and
operators into expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for
the grammar rules it uses.
The tokens come from a function called the "lexical analyzer" that
you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
doesn't know what is "inside" the tokens (though their semantic values
may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this. *Note
The Lexical Analyzer Function `yylex': Lexical.
The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
function named `yyparse' which implements that grammar. This function
does not make a complete C program: you must supply some additional
functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an error-reporting
function which the parser calls to report an error. In addition, a
complete C program must start with a function called `main'; you have
to provide this, and arrange for it to call `yyparse' or the parser
will never run. *Note Parser C-Language Interface: Interface.
Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
itself begin with `yy' or `YY'. This includes interface functions such
as the lexical analyzer function `yylex', the error reporting function
`yyerror' and the parser function `yyparse' itself. This also includes
numerous identifiers used for internal purposes. Therefore, you should
avoid using C identifiers starting with `yy' or `YY' in the Bison
grammar file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you
should avoid using the C identifiers `malloc' and `free' for anything
other than their usual meanings.
In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, `<alloca.h>',
`<malloc.h>', `<stddef.h>', and `<stdlib.h>' are included as needed to
declare memory allocators and related types. `<libintl.h>' is included
if message translation is in use (*note Internationalization::). Other
system headers may be included if you define `YYDEBUG' to a nonzero
value (*note Tracing Your Parser: Tracing.).
File: bison.info, Node: Stages, Next: Grammar Layout, Prev: Bison Parser, Up: Concepts
1.8 Stages in Using Bison
=========================
The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar
specification to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1. Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison (*note
Bison Grammar Files: Grammar File.). For each grammatical rule in
the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
sequence of C statements.
2. Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the
parser. The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (*note
The Lexical Analyzer Function `yylex': Lexical.). It could also
be produced using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this
manual.
3. Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
4. Write error-reporting routines.
To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
must follow these steps:
1. Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
2. Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source
files.
3. Link the object files to produce the finished product.
File: bison.info, Node: Grammar Layout, Prev: Stages, Up: Concepts
1.9 The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
=========================================
The input file for the Bison utility is a "Bison grammar file". The
general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
%{
PROLOGUE
%}
BISON DECLARATIONS
%%
GRAMMAR RULES
%%
EPILOGUE
The `%%', `%{' and `%}' are punctuation that appears in every Bison
grammar file to separate the sections.
The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions.
You can also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and
use `#include' to include header files that do any of these things.
You need to declare the lexical analyzer `yylex' and the error printer
`yyerror' here, along with any other global identifiers used by the
actions in the grammar rules.
The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and
nonterminal symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the
data types of semantic values of various symbols.
The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol
from its parts.
The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a simple
program, all the rest of the program can go here.
File: bison.info, Node: Examples, Next: Grammar File, Prev: Concepts, Up: Top
2 Examples
**********
Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
calculator -- later extended to track "locations" -- and a
multi-function calculator. All produce usable, though limited,
interactive desk-top calculators.
These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
source file to try them.
* Menu:
* RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
a first example with no operator precedence.
* Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
Operator precedence is introduced.
* Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
* Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @N and @$.
* Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
* Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
File: bison.info, Node: RPN Calc, Next: Infix Calc, Up: Examples
2.1 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
======================================
The first example is that of a simple double-precision "reverse polish
notation" calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This
example provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is
not an issue. The second example will illustrate how operator
precedence is handled.
The source code for this calculator is named `rpcalc.y'. The `.y'
extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
* Menu:
* Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
* Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
* Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
* Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
* Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
* Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
* Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Declarations, Next: Rpcalc Rules, Up: RPN Calc
2.1.1 Declarations for `rpcalc'
-------------------------------
Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
calculator. As in C, comments are placed between `/*...*/'.
/* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
%{
#define YYSTYPE double
#include <math.h>
int yylex (void);
void yyerror (char const *);
%}
%token NUM
%% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
The declarations section (*note The prologue: Prologue.) contains two
preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
The `#define' directive defines the macro `YYSTYPE', thus specifying
the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and groupings (*note
Data Types of Semantic Values: Value Type.). The Bison parser will use
whatever type `YYSTYPE' is defined as; if you don't define it, `int' is
the default. Because we specify `double', each token and each
expression has an associated value, which is a floating point number.
The `#include' directive is used to declare the exponentiation
function `pow'.
The forward declarations for `yylex' and `yyerror' are needed
because the C language requires that functions be declared before they
are used. These functions will be defined in the epilogue, but the
parser calls them so they must be declared in the prologue.
The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
about the token types (*note The Bison Declarations Section: Bison
Declarations.). Each terminal symbol that is not a single-character
literal must be declared here. (Single-character literals normally
don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the arithmetic
operators are designated by single-character literals, so the only
terminal symbol that needs to be declared is `NUM', the token type for
numeric constants.
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Rules, Next: Rpcalc Lexer, Prev: Rpcalc Declarations, Up: RPN Calc
2.1.2 Grammar Rules for `rpcalc'
--------------------------------
Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
input:
/* empty */
| input line
;
line:
'\n'
| exp '\n' { printf ("%.10g\n", $1); }
;
exp:
NUM { $$ = $1; }
| exp exp '+' { $$ = $1 + $2; }
| exp exp '-' { $$ = $1 - $2; }
| exp exp '*' { $$ = $1 * $2; }
| exp exp '/' { $$ = $1 / $2; }
| exp exp '^' { $$ = pow ($1, $2); } /* Exponentiation */
| exp 'n' { $$ = -$1; } /* Unary minus */
;
%%
The groupings of the rpcalc "language" defined here are the
expression (given the name `exp'), the line of input (`line'), and the
complete input transcript (`input'). Each of these nonterminal symbols
has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar `|' which is
read as "or". The following sections explain what these rules mean.
The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken
when a grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears
inside braces. *Note Actions::.
You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
pseudo-variable `$$' stands for the semantic value for the grouping
that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to `$$' is the
main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
rule are referred to as `$1', `$2', and so on.
* Menu:
* Rpcalc Input::
* Rpcalc Line::
* Rpcalc Expr::
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Input, Next: Rpcalc Line, Up: Rpcalc Rules
2.1.2.1 Explanation of `input'
..............................
Consider the definition of `input':
input:
/* empty */
| input line
;
This definition reads as follows: "A complete input is either an
empty string, or a complete input followed by an input line". Notice
that "complete input" is defined in terms of itself. This definition
is said to be "left recursive" since `input' appears always as the
leftmost symbol in the sequence. *Note Recursive Rules: Recursion.
The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between
the colon and the first `|'; this means that `input' can match an empty
string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it is
legitimate to type `Ctrl-d' right after you start the calculator. It's
conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
`/* empty */' in it.
The second alternate rule (`input line') handles all nontrivial
input. It means, "After reading any number of lines, read one more
line if possible." The left recursion makes this rule into a loop.
Since the first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be
executed zero or more times.
The parser function `yyparse' continues to process input until a
grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Line, Next: Rpcalc Expr, Prev: Rpcalc Input, Up: Rpcalc Rules
2.1.2.2 Explanation of `line'
.............................
Now consider the definition of `line':
line:
'\n'
| exp '\n' { printf ("%.10g\n", $1); }
;
The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this
means that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is
no action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a
newline. This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The
semantic value of the `exp' grouping is the value of `$1' because the
`exp' in question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action
prints this value, which is the result of the computation the user
asked for.
This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to `$$'.
As a consequence, the semantic value associated with the `line' is
uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed
the value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Expr, Prev: Rpcalc Line, Up: Rpcalc Rules
2.1.2.3 Explanation of `expr'
.............................
The `exp' grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just
numbers. The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like
two expressions followed by a plus-sign. The third handles
subtraction, and so on.
exp:
NUM
| exp exp '+' { $$ = $1 + $2; }
| exp exp '-' { $$ = $1 - $2; }
...
;
We have used `|' to join all the rules for `exp', but we could
equally well have written them separately:
exp: NUM ;
exp: exp exp '+' { $$ = $1 + $2; };
exp: exp exp '-' { $$ = $1 - $2; };
...
Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the
expression in terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the
rule for addition, `$1' refers to the first component `exp' and `$2'
refers to the second one. The third component, `'+'', has no meaningful
associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
`$3'. When `yyparse' recognizes a sum expression using this rule, the
sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of the
entire expression. *Note Actions::.
You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
action, Bison by default copies the value of `$1' into `$$'. This is
what happens in the first rule (the one that uses `NUM').
The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison
does not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you
wish. For example, this:
exp: NUM | exp exp '+' {$$ = $1 + $2; } | ... ;
means the same thing as this:
exp:
NUM
| exp exp '+' { $$ = $1 + $2; }
| ...
;
The latter, however, is much more readable.
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Lexer, Next: Rpcalc Main, Prev: Rpcalc Rules, Up: RPN Calc
2.1.3 The `rpcalc' Lexical Analyzer
-----------------------------------
The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. *Note The Lexical Analyzer
Function `yylex': Lexical.
Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN calculator.
This lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
`double' and returns them as `NUM' tokens. Any other character that
isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
for such a single-character token is the character itself.
The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code
which represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to
stand for this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code
for the type. This works in two ways. If the token type is a
character literal, then its numeric code is that of the character; you
can use the same character literal in the lexical analyzer to express
the number. If the token type is an identifier, that identifier is
defined by Bison as a C macro whose definition is the appropriate
number. In this example, therefore, `NUM' becomes a macro for `yylex'
to use.
The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
global variable `yylval', which is where the Bison parser will look for
it. (The C data type of `yylval' is `YYSTYPE', which was defined at
the beginning of the grammar; *note Declarations for `rpcalc': Rpcalc
Declarations.)
A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is
encountered. (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating
end-of-input.)
Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
/* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
#include <ctype.h>
int
yylex (void)
{
int c;
/* Skip white space. */
while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
continue;
/* Process numbers. */
if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
{
ungetc (c, stdin);
scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
return NUM;
}
/* Return end-of-input. */
if (c == EOF)
return 0;
/* Return a single char. */
return c;
}
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Main, Next: Rpcalc Error, Prev: Rpcalc Lexer, Up: RPN Calc
2.1.4 The Controlling Function
------------------------------
In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
`yyparse' to start the process of parsing.
int
main (void)
{
return yyparse ();
}
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Error, Next: Rpcalc Generate, Prev: Rpcalc Main, Up: RPN Calc
2.1.5 The Error Reporting Routine
---------------------------------
When `yyparse' detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
function `yyerror' to print an error message (usually but not always
`"syntax error"'). It is up to the programmer to supply `yyerror'
(*note Parser C-Language Interface: Interface.), so here is the
definition we will use:
#include <stdio.h>
/* Called by yyparse on error. */
void
yyerror (char const *s)
{
fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
}
After `yyerror' returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
(*note Error Recovery::). Otherwise, `yyparse' returns nonzero. We
have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input
will cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior
for a real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Generate, Next: Rpcalc Compile, Prev: Rpcalc Error, Up: RPN Calc
2.1.6 Running Bison to Make the Parser
--------------------------------------
Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file, the
grammar file. The definitions of `yylex', `yyerror' and `main' go at
the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file (*note The Overall Layout
of a Bison Grammar: Grammar Layout.).
For a large project, you would probably have several source files,
and use `make' to arrange to recompile them.
With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following
command to convert it into a parser implementation file:
bison FILE.y
In this example, the grammar file is called `rpcalc.y' (for "Reverse
Polish CALCulator"). Bison produces a parser implementation file named
`FILE.tab.c', removing the `.y' from the grammar file name. The parser
implementation file contains the source code for `yyparse'. The
additional functions in the grammar file (`yylex', `yyerror' and
`main') are copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
File: bison.info, Node: Rpcalc Compile, Prev: Rpcalc Generate, Up: RPN Calc
2.1.7 Compiling the Parser Implementation File
----------------------------------------------
Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
# List files in current directory.
$ ls
rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
# Compile the Bison parser.
# `-lm' tells compiler to search math library for `pow'.
$ cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c
# List files again.
$ ls
rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
The file `rpcalc' now contains the executable code. Here is an
example session using `rpcalc'.
$ rpcalc
4 9 +
13
3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-
-13
3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n Note the unary minus, `n'
13
5 6 / 4 n +
-3.166666667
3 4 ^ Exponentiation
81
^D End-of-file indicator
$
File: bison.info, Node: Infix Calc, Next: Simple Error Recovery, Prev: RPN Calc, Up: Examples
2.2 Infix Notation Calculator: `calc'
=====================================
We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix.
Infix notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need
for parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
`calc.y', an infix desk-top calculator.
/* Infix notation calculator. */
%{
#define YYSTYPE double
#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int yylex (void);
void yyerror (char const *);
%}
/* Bison declarations. */
%token NUM
%left '-' '+'
%left '*' '/'
%left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
%right '^' /* exponentiation */
%% /* The grammar follows. */
input:
/* empty */
| input line
;
line:
'\n'
| exp '\n' { printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); }
;
exp:
NUM { $$ = $1; }
| exp '+' exp { $$ = $1 + $3; }
| exp '-' exp { $$ = $1 - $3; }
| exp '*' exp { $$ = $1 * $3; }
| exp '/' exp { $$ = $1 / $3; }
| '-' exp %prec NEG { $$ = -$2; }
| exp '^' exp { $$ = pow ($1, $3); }
| '(' exp ')' { $$ = $2; }
;
%%
The functions `yylex', `yyerror' and `main' can be the same as before.
There are two important new features shown in this code.
In the second section (Bison declarations), `%left' declares token
types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
`%left' and `%right' (right associativity) take the place of `%token'
which is used to declare a token type name without associativity.
(These tokens are single-character literals, which ordinarily don't
need to be declared. We declare them here to specify the
associativity.)
Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
has the highest precedence, unary minus (`NEG') is next, followed by
`*' and `/', and so on. *Note Operator Precedence: Precedence.
The other important new feature is the `%prec' in the grammar
section for the unary minus operator. The `%prec' simply instructs
Bison that the rule `| '-' exp' has the same precedence as `NEG'--in
this case the next-to-highest. *Note Context-Dependent Precedence:
Contextual Precedence.
Here is a sample run of `calc.y':
$ calc
4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))
6.880952381
-56 + 2
-54
3 ^ 2
9
File: bison.info, Node: Simple Error Recovery, Next: Location Tracking Calc, Prev: Infix Calc, Up: Examples
2.3 Simple Error Recovery
=========================
Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of "error
recovery"--how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
error. All we have handled is error reporting with `yyerror'. Recall
that by default `yyparse' returns after calling `yyerror'. This means
that an erroneous input line causes the calculator program to exit.
Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
The Bison language itself includes the reserved word `error', which
may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has been
added to one of the alternatives for `line':
line:
'\n'
| exp '\n' { printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); }
| error '\n' { yyerrok; }
;
This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for `line', and
parsing will continue. (The `yyerror' function is still called upon to
print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
`yyerrok', a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is that
error recovery is complete (*note Error Recovery::). Note the
difference between `yyerrok' and `yyerror'; neither one is a misprint.
This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are
other kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an
exception signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program
must handle this signal and use `longjmp' to return to `main' and
resume parsing input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of
the current line of input. We won't discuss this issue further because
it is not specific to Bison programs.
File: bison.info, Node: Location Tracking Calc, Next: Multi-function Calc, Prev: Simple Error Recovery, Up: Examples
2.4 Location Tracking Calculator: `ltcalc'
==========================================
This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
analyzer.
* Menu:
* Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
* Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
* Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
File: bison.info, Node: Ltcalc Declarations, Next: Ltcalc Rules, Up: Location Tracking Calc
2.4.1 Declarations for `ltcalc'
-------------------------------
The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
/* Location tracking calculator. */
%{
#define YYSTYPE int
#include <math.h>
int yylex (void);
void yyerror (char const *);
%}
/* Bison declarations. */
%token NUM
%left '-' '+'
%left '*' '/'
%left NEG
%right '^'
%% /* The grammar follows. */
Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
by default (*note Data Types of Locations: Location Type.), which is a
four member structure with the following integer fields: `first_line',
`first_column', `last_line' and `last_column'. By conventions, and in
accordance with the GNU Coding Standards and common practice, the line
and column count both start at 1.
File: bison.info, Node: Ltcalc Rules, Next: Ltcalc Lexer, Prev: Ltcalc Declarations, Up: Location Tracking Calc
2.4.2 Grammar Rules for `ltcalc'
--------------------------------
Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
from the new information.
Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate
the wrong expressions or subexpressions.
input:
/* empty */
| input line
;
line:
'\n'
| exp '\n' { printf ("%d\n", $1); }
;
exp:
NUM { $$ = $1; }
| exp '+' exp { $$ = $1 + $3; }
| exp '-' exp { $$ = $1 - $3; }
| exp '*' exp { $$ = $1 * $3; }
| exp '/' exp
{
if ($3)
$$ = $1 / $3;
else
{
$$ = 1;
fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
@3.first_line, @3.first_column,
@3.last_line, @3.last_column);
}
}
| '-' exp %prec NEG { $$ = -$2; }
| exp '^' exp { $$ = pow ($1, $3); }
| '(' exp ')' { $$ = $2; }
This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
using the pseudo-variables `@N' for rule components, and the
pseudo-variable `@$' for groupings.
We don't need to assign a value to `@$': the output parser does it
automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
`@$' is set to range from the beginning of `@1' to the end of `@N', for
a rule with N components. This behavior can be redefined (*note
Default Action for Locations: Location Default Action.), and for very
specific rules, `@$' can be computed by hand.
File: bison.info, Node: Ltcalc Lexer, Prev: Ltcalc Rules, Up: Location Tracking Calc
2.4.3 The `ltcalc' Lexical Analyzer.
------------------------------------
Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location tracking.
The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it able to
feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
semantic values.
To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
int
yylex (void)
{
int c;
/* Skip white space. */
while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
++yylloc.last_column;
/* Step. */
yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
/* Process numbers. */
if (isdigit (c))
{
yylval = c - '0';
++yylloc.last_column;
while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
{
++yylloc.last_column;
yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
}
ungetc (c, stdin);
return NUM;
}
/* Return end-of-input. */
if (c == EOF)
return 0;
/* Return a single char, and update location. */
if (c == '\n')
{
++yylloc.last_line;
yylloc.last_column = 0;
}
else
++yylloc.last_column;
return c;
}
Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as
before: it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character
tokens. In addition, it updates `yylloc', the global variable (of type
`YYLTYPE') containing the token's location.
Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its
number as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text.
The last needed change is to initialize `yylloc', for example in the
controlling function:
int
main (void)
{
yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
return yyparse ();
}
Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
File: bison.info, Node: Multi-function Calc, Next: Exercises, Prev: Location Tracking Calc, Up: Examples
2.5 Multi-Function Calculator: `mfcalc'
=======================================
Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on
to a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
functions, `+', `-', `*', `/' and `^'. It would be nice to have a
calculator that provides other mathematical functions such as `sin',
`cos', etc.
It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as
they are only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer `yylex'
passes back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules
suffice for adding a new operator. But we want something more
flexible: built-in functions whose syntax has this form:
FUNCTION_NAME (ARGUMENT)
At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
$ mfcalc
pi = 3.141592653589
3.1415926536
sin(pi)
0.0000000000
alpha = beta1 = 2.3
2.3000000000
alpha
2.3000000000
ln(alpha)
0.8329091229
exp(ln(beta1))
2.3000000000
$
Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are
permitted.
* Menu:
* Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
* Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
* Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
File: bison.info, Node: Mfcalc Declarations, Next: Mfcalc Rules, Up: Multi-function Calc
2.5.1 Declarations for `mfcalc'
-------------------------------
Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
%{
#include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
#include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
int yylex (void);
void yyerror (char const *);
%}
%union {
double val; /* For returning numbers. */
symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
}
%token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
%token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
%type <val> exp
%right '='
%left '-' '+'
%left '*' '/'
%left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
%right '^' /* exponentiation */
The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison
language. These features allow semantic values to have various data
types (*note More Than One Value Type: Multiple Types.).
The `%union' declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
this is instead of defining `YYSTYPE'. The allowable types are now
double-floats (for `exp' and `NUM') and pointers to entries in the
symbol table. *Note The Collection of Value Types: Union Decl.
Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to
associate a type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used.
These symbols are `NUM', `VAR', `FNCT', and `exp'. Their declarations
are augmented with information about their data type (placed between
angle brackets).
The Bison construct `%type' is used for declaring nonterminal
symbols, just as `%token' is used for declaring token types. We have
not used `%type' before because nonterminal symbols are normally
declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But `exp' must be
declared explicitly so we can specify its value type. *Note
Nonterminal Symbols: Type Decl.
File: bison.info, Node: Mfcalc Rules, Next: Mfcalc Symbol Table, Prev: Mfcalc Declarations, Up: Multi-function Calc
2.5.2 Grammar Rules for `mfcalc'
--------------------------------
Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator. Most of
them are copied directly from `calc'; three rules, those which mention
`VAR' or `FNCT', are new.
%% /* The grammar follows. */
input:
/* empty */
| input line
;
line:
'\n'
| exp '\n' { printf ("%.10g\n", $1); }
| error '\n' { yyerrok; }
;
exp:
NUM { $$ = $1; }
| VAR { $$ = $1->value.var; }
| VAR '=' exp { $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; }
| FNCT '(' exp ')' { $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); }
| exp '+' exp { $$ = $1 + $3; }
| exp '-' exp { $$ = $1 - $3; }
| exp '*' exp { $$ = $1 * $3; }
| exp '/' exp { $$ = $1 / $3; }
| '-' exp %prec NEG { $$ = -$2; }
| exp '^' exp { $$ = pow ($1, $3); }
| '(' exp ')' { $$ = $2; }
;
/* End of grammar. */
%%
File: bison.info, Node: Mfcalc Symbol Table, Prev: Mfcalc Rules, Up: Multi-function Calc
2.5.3 The `mfcalc' Symbol Table
-------------------------------
The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of
the names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect
the grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations,
but it requires some additional C functions for support.
The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
definition, which is kept in the header `calc.h', is as follows. It
provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
/* Function type. */
typedef double (*func_t) (double);
/* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
struct symrec
{
char *name; /* name of symbol */
int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
union
{
double var; /* value of a VAR */
func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
} value;
struct symrec *next; /* link field */
};
typedef struct symrec symrec;
/* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
extern symrec *sym_table;
symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
symrec *getsym (char const *);
The new version of `main' includes a call to `init_table', a
function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
`init_table' as well:
#include <stdio.h>
/* Called by yyparse on error. */
void
yyerror (char const *s)
{
fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
}
struct init
{
char const *fname;
double (*fnct) (double);
};
struct init const arith_fncts[] =
{
"sin", sin,
"cos", cos,
"atan", atan,
"ln", log,
"exp", exp,
"sqrt", sqrt,
0, 0
};
/* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
symrec *sym_table;
/* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
void
init_table (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
{
symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
}
}
int
main (void)
{
init_table ();
return yyparse ();
}
By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary
include files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in
the symbol table. The function `putsym' is passed a name and the type
(`VAR' or `FNCT') of the object to be installed. The object is linked
to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned. The
function `getsym' is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
#include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
#include <string.h> /* strlen. */
symrec *
putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
{
symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
ptr->type = sym_type;
ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
sym_table = ptr;
return ptr;
}
symrec *
getsym (char const *sym_name)
{
symrec *ptr;
for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
return ptr;
return 0;
}
The function `yylex' must now recognize variables, numeric values,
and the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
The string is passed to `getsym' for look up in the symbol table. If
the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
(`VAR' or `FNCT') is returned to `yyparse'. If it is not already in
the table, then it is installed as a `VAR' using `putsym'. Again, a
pointer and its type (which must be `VAR') is returned to `yyparse'.
No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
operators in `yylex'.
#include <ctype.h>
int
yylex (void)
{
int c;
/* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
continue;
if (c == EOF)
return 0;
/* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
{
ungetc (c, stdin);
scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
return NUM;
}
/* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
if (isalpha (c))
{
/* Initially make the buffer long enough
for a 40-character symbol name. */
static size_t length = 40;
static char *symbuf = 0;
symrec *s;
int i;
if (!symbuf)
symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
i = 0;
do
{
/* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
if (i == length)
{
length *= 2;
symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
}
/* Add this character to the buffer. */
symbuf[i++] = c;
/* Get another character. */
c = getchar ();
}
while (isalnum (c));
ungetc (c, stdin);
symbuf[i] = '\0';
s = getsym (symbuf);
if (s == 0)
s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
yylval.tptr = s;
return s->type;
}
/* Any other character is a token by itself. */
return c;
}
The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
`main' includes a call to `init_table' and sets the `yydebug' on user
demand (*Note Tracing Your Parser: Tracing, for details):
/* Called by yyparse on error. */
void
yyerror (char const *s)
{
fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
}
int
main (int argc, char const* argv[])
{
int i;
/* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
yydebug = 1;
init_table ();
return yyparse ();
}
This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
predefined variables such as `pi' or `e' as well.
File: bison.info, Node: Exercises, Prev: Multi-function Calc, Up: Examples
2.6 Exercises
=============
1. Add some new functions from `math.h' to the initialization list.
2. Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
modify `init_table' to add these constants to the symbol table.
It will be easiest to give the constants type `VAR'.
3. Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
File: bison.info, Node: Grammar File, Next: Interface, Prev: Examples, Up: Top
3 Bison Grammar Files
*********************
Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in `.y'.
*Note Invoking Bison: Invocation.
* Menu:
* Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
* Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
* Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
* Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
* Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
* Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
* Named References:: Using named references in actions.
* Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
* Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
File: bison.info, Node: Grammar Outline, Next: Symbols, Up: Grammar File
3.1 Outline of a Bison Grammar
==============================
A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
appropriate delimiters:
%{
PROLOGUE
%}
BISON DECLARATIONS
%%
GRAMMAR RULES
%%
EPILOGUE
Comments enclosed in `/* ... */' may appear in any of the sections.
As a GNU extension, `//' introduces a comment that continues until end
of line.
* Menu:
* Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
* Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
* Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
* Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
* Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
File: bison.info, Node: Prologue, Next: Prologue Alternatives, Up: Grammar Outline
3.1.1 The prologue
------------------
The PROLOGUE section contains macro definitions and declarations of
functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
file so that they precede the definition of `yyparse'. You can use
`#include' to get the declarations from a header file. If you don't
need any C declarations, you may omit the `%{' and `%}' delimiters that
bracket this section.
The PROLOGUE section is terminated by the first occurrence of `%}'
that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a character constant.
You may have more than one PROLOGUE section, intermixed with the
BISON DECLARATIONS. This allows you to have C and Bison declarations
that refer to each other. For example, the `%union' declaration may
use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to prototype
functions that take arguments of type `YYSTYPE'. This can be done with
two PROLOGUE blocks, one before and one after the `%union' declaration.
%{
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include "ptypes.h"
%}
%union {
long int n;
tree t; /* `tree' is defined in `ptypes.h'. */
}
%{
static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
#define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
%}
...
When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions of
feature test macros like `_GNU_SOURCE' or `_POSIX_C_SOURCE' should
appear before all Bison declarations, as feature test macros can affect
the behavior of Bison-generated `#include' directives.
File: bison.info, Node: Prologue Alternatives, Next: Bison Declarations, Prev: Prologue, Up: Grammar Outline
3.1.2 Prologue Alternatives
---------------------------
The functionality of PROLOGUE sections can often be subtle and
inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a `%code' directive with
an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the purpose of the code
and thus the location(s) where Bison should generate it. For C/C++,
the qualifier can be omitted for the default location, or it can be one
of `requires', `provides', `top'. *Note %code Summary::.
Look again at the example of the previous section:
%{
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include "ptypes.h"
%}
%union {
long int n;
tree t; /* `tree' is defined in `ptypes.h'. */
}
%{
static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
#define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
%}
...
Notice that there are two PROLOGUE sections here, but there's a subtle
distinction between their functionality. For example, if you decide to
override Bison's default definition for `YYLTYPE', in which PROLOGUE
section should you write your new definition? You should write it in
the first since Bison will insert that code into the parser
implementation file _before_ the default `YYLTYPE' definition. In
which PROLOGUE section should you prototype an internal function,
`trace_token', that accepts `YYLTYPE' and `yytokentype' as arguments?
You should prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
_after_ the `YYLTYPE' and `yytokentype' definitions.
This distinction in functionality between the two PROLOGUE sections
is established by the appearance of the `%union' between them. This
behavior raises a few questions. First, why should the position of a
`%union' affect definitions related to `YYLTYPE' and `yytokentype'?
Second, what if there is no `%union'? In that case, the second kind of
PROLOGUE section is not available. This behavior is not intuitive.
To avoid this subtle `%union' dependency, rewrite the example using a
`%code top' and an unqualified `%code'. Let's go ahead and add the new
`YYLTYPE' definition and the `trace_token' prototype at the same time:
%code top {
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
/* WARNING: The following code really belongs
* in a `%code requires'; see below. */
#include "ptypes.h"
#define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
typedef struct YYLTYPE
{
int first_line;
int first_column;
int last_line;
int last_column;
char *filename;
} YYLTYPE;
}
%union {
long int n;
tree t; /* `tree' is defined in `ptypes.h'. */
}
%code {
static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
#define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
}
...
In this way, `%code top' and the unqualified `%code' achieve the same
functionality as the two kinds of PROLOGUE sections, but it's always
explicit which kind you intend. Moreover, both kinds are always
available even in the absence of `%union'.
The `%code top' block above logically contains two parts. The first
two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the parser
implementation file. The first line after the warning is required by
`YYSTYPE' and thus also needs to appear in the parser implementation
file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate a parser header
file (*note %defines: Decl Summary.), you probably want that line to
appear before the `YYSTYPE' definition in that header file as well.
The `YYLTYPE' definition should also appear in the parser header file
to override the default `YYLTYPE' definition there.
In other words, in the `%code top' block above, all but the first two
lines are dependency code required by the `YYSTYPE' and `YYLTYPE'
definitions. Thus, they belong in one or more `%code requires':
%code top {
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
}
%code requires {
#include "ptypes.h"
}
%union {
long int n;
tree t; /* `tree' is defined in `ptypes.h'. */
}
%code requires {
#define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
typedef struct YYLTYPE
{
int first_line;
int first_column;
int last_line;
int last_column;
char *filename;
} YYLTYPE;
}
%code {
static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
#define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
}
...
Now Bison will insert `#include "ptypes.h"' and the new `YYLTYPE'
definition before the Bison-generated `YYSTYPE' and `YYLTYPE'
definitions in both the parser implementation file and the parser
header file. (By the same reasoning, `%code requires' would also be
the appropriate place to write your own definition for `YYSTYPE'.)
When you are writing dependency code for `YYSTYPE' and `YYLTYPE',
you should prefer `%code requires' over `%code top' regardless of
whether you instruct Bison to generate a parser header file. When you
are writing code that you need Bison to insert only into the parser
implementation file and that has no special need to appear at the top
of that file, you should prefer the unqualified `%code' over `%code
top'. These practices will make the purpose of each block of your code
explicit to Bison and to other developers reading your grammar file.
Following these practices, we expect the unqualified `%code' and `%code
requires' to be the most important of the four PROLOGUE alternatives.
At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
provide `trace_token' to modules that are external to your parser.
Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into both the
parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since this
function is not a dependency required by `YYSTYPE' or `YYLTYPE', it
doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a `%code requires'. More
importantly, since it depends upon `YYLTYPE' and `yytokentype', `%code
requires' is not sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the
unqualified `%code' to a `%code provides':
%code top {
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
}
%code requires {
#include "ptypes.h"
}
%union {
long int n;
tree t; /* `tree' is defined in `ptypes.h'. */
}
%code requires {
#define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
typedef struct YYLTYPE
{
int first_line;
int first_column;
int last_line;
int last_column;
char *filename;
} YYLTYPE;
}
%code provides {
void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
}
%code {
static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
#define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
}
...
Bison will insert the `trace_token' prototype into both the parser
header file and the parser implementation file after the definitions
for `yytokentype', `YYLTYPE', and `YYSTYPE'.
The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
files: `%code top', `%code requires', `%code provides', and then
`%code'. While your grammar files may generally be easier to read if
you also follow this order, Bison does not require it. Instead, Bison
lets you choose an organization that makes sense to you.
You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the
grammar file. In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in
declaration order. This is the only way in which the position of one
of these directives within the grammar file affects its functionality.
The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in
how you may organize your grammar file. For example, you may organize
semantic-type-related directives by semantic type:
%code requires { #include "type1.h" }
%union { type1 field1; }
%destructor { type1_free ($$); } <field1>
%printer { type1_print (yyoutput, $$); } <field1>
%code requires { #include "type2.h" }
%union { type2 field2; }
%destructor { type2_free ($$); } <field2>
%printer { type2_print (yyoutput, $$); } <field2>
You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules
section of the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the
associated semantic type. (In the rules section, you must terminate
each of those directives with a semicolon.) And you don't have to
worry that some directive (like a `%union') in the definitions section
is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first. Such an
organization is not possible using PROLOGUE sections.
This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of
the four PROLOGUE alternatives over the original Yacc PROLOGUE.
However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need
to think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of
your code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
`%code' is the most generic label. Move code to `%code requires',
`%code provides', or `%code top' as needed.
File: bison.info, Node: Bison Declarations, Next: Grammar Rules, Prev: Prologue Alternatives, Up: Grammar Outline
3.1.3 The Bison Declarations Section
------------------------------------
The BISON DECLARATIONS section contains declarations that define
terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on. In
some simple grammars you may not need any declarations. *Note Bison
Declarations: Declarations.
File: bison.info, Node: Grammar Rules, Next: Epilogue, Prev: Bison Declarations, Up: Grammar Outline
3.1.4 The Grammar Rules Section
-------------------------------
The "grammar rules" section contains one or more Bison grammar rules,
and nothing else. *Note Syntax of Grammar Rules: Rules.
There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first `%%'
(which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even if it is
the first thing in the file.
File: bison.info, Node: Epilogue, Prev: Grammar Rules, Up: Grammar Outline
3.1.5 The epilogue
------------------
The EPILOGUE is copied verbatim to the end of the parser implementation
file, just as the PROLOGUE is copied to the beginning. This is the
most convenient place to put anything that you want to have in the
parser implementation file but which need not come before the
definition of `yyparse'. For example, the definitions of `yylex' and
`yyerror' often go here. Because C requires functions to be declared
before being used, you often need to declare functions like `yylex' and
`yyerror' in the Prologue, even if you define them in the Epilogue.
*Note Parser C-Language Interface: Interface.
If the last section is empty, you may omit the `%%' that separates it
from the grammar rules.
The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose
names start with `yy' or `YY', so it is a good idea to avoid using any
such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue of
the grammar file.
File: bison.info, Node: Symbols, Next: Rules, Prev: Grammar Outline, Up: Grammar File
3.2 Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
=====================================
"Symbols" in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
of the language.
A "terminal symbol" (also known as a "token type") represents a
class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the `yylex'
function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
the symbol to stand for it.
A "nonterminal symbol" stands for a class of syntactically
equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
By convention, it should be all lower case.
Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and
non-initial digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU
extension, incompatible with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make
symbol names less convenient to use with named references, which
require brackets around such names (*note Named References::).
Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes make little sense:
since they are not valid symbols (in most programming languages) they
are not exported as token names.
There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
* A "named token type" is written with an identifier, like an
identifier in C. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
`%token'. *Note Token Type Names: Token Decl.
* A "character token type" (or "literal character token") is written
in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
constants; for example, `'+'' is a character token type. A
character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
specify its semantic value data type (*note Data Types of Semantic
Values: Value Type.), associativity, or precedence (*note Operator
Precedence: Precedence.).
By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
type `'+'' is used to represent the character `+' as a token.
Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it, your
program will confuse other readers.
All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can
be used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character
as a character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
end-of-input (*note Calling Convention for `yylex': Calling
Convention.). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no special
meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
allowed.
* A "literal string token" is written like a C string constant; for
example, `"<="' is a literal string token. A literal string token
doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
value data type (*note Value Type::), associativity, or precedence
(*note Precedence::).
You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as
an alias, using the `%token' declaration (*note Token
Declarations: Token Decl.). If you don't do that, the lexical
analyzer has to retrieve the token number for the literal string
token from the `yytname' table (*note Calling Convention::).
*Warning*: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a
token that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should
use the token type `"<="' to represent the string `<=' as a token.
Bison does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it,
people who read your program will be confused.
All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used
in Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character
within a string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have
no special meaning in Bison string literals, nor is
backslash-newline allowed. A literal string token must contain
two or more characters; for a token containing just one character,
use a character token (see above).
How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
on when the parser function returns that symbol.
The value returned by `yylex' is always one of the terminal symbols,
except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input. Whichever
way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write it the
same way in the definition of `yylex'. The numeric code for a
character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
character, so `yylex' can use the identical value to generate the
requisite code, though you may need to convert it to `unsigned char' to
avoid sign-extension on hosts where `char' is signed. Each named token
type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation file, so `yylex'
can use the name to stand for the code. (This is why periods don't
make sense in terminal symbols.) *Note Calling Convention for `yylex':
Calling Convention.
If `yylex' is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the `-d'
option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
into a separate header file `NAME.tab.h' which you can include in the
other source files that need it. *Note Invoking Bison: Invocation.
If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
execution character set of Standard C. This set consists of the ten
digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
characters in the following C-language string:
"\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_{|}~"
The `yylex' function and Bison must use a consistent character set
and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting program in an
environment that uses an incompatible character set like EBCDIC, the
resulting program may not work because the tables generated by Bison
will assume ASCII numeric values for character tokens. It is standard
practice for software distributions to contain C source files that were
generated by Bison in an ASCII environment, so installers on platforms
that are incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
compiling them.
The symbol `error' is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
(*note Error Recovery::); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
In particular, `yylex' should never return this value. The default
value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
one of your tokens with a `%token' declaration.
File: bison.info, Node: Rules, Next: Recursion, Prev: Symbols, Up: Grammar File
3.3 Syntax of Grammar Rules
===========================
A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
RESULT: COMPONENTS...;
where RESULT is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes, and
COMPONENTS are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that are put
together by this rule (*note Symbols::).
For example,
exp: exp '+' exp;
says that two groupings of type `exp', with a `+' token in between, can
be combined into a larger grouping of type `exp'.
White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You
can add extra white space as you wish.
Scattered among the components can be ACTIONS that determine the
semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
{C STATEMENTS}
This is an example of "braced code", that is, C code surrounded by
braces, much like a compound statement in C. Braced code can contain
any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C compiler
can check it.
Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by
braces within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it
is affected by the C digraphs `<%' and `%>' that represent braces. At
the top level braced code must be terminated by `}' and not by a
digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced code uses
trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the nesting of
braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or character
constants.
Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
*Note Actions::.
Multiple rules for the same RESULT can be written separately or can
be joined with the vertical-bar character `|' as follows:
RESULT:
RULE1-COMPONENTS...
| RULE2-COMPONENTS...
...
;
They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
If COMPONENTS in a rule is empty, it means that RESULT can match the
empty string. For example, here is how to define a comma-separated
sequence of zero or more `exp' groupings:
expseq:
/* empty */
| expseq1
;
expseq1:
exp
| expseq1 ',' exp
;
It is customary to write a comment `/* empty */' in each rule with no
components.
File: bison.info, Node: Recursion, Next: Semantics, Prev: Rules, Up: Grammar File
3.4 Recursive Rules
===================
A rule is called "recursive" when its RESULT nonterminal appears also
on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to use
recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
expseq1:
exp
| expseq1 ',' exp
;
Since the recursive use of `expseq1' is the leftmost symbol in the
right hand side, we call this "left recursion". By contrast, here the
same construct is defined using "right recursion":
expseq1:
exp
| exp ',' expseq1
;
Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once. *Note
The Bison Parser Algorithm: Algorithm, for further explanation of this.
"Indirect" or "mutual" recursion occurs when the result of the rule
does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear in
rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand side.
For example:
expr:
primary
| primary '+' primary
;
primary:
constant
| '(' expr ')'
;
defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
other.
File: bison.info, Node: Semantics, Next: Tracking Locations, Prev: Recursion, Up: Grammar File
3.5 Defining Language Semantics
===============================
The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The
semantics are determined by the semantic values associated with various
tokens and groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings
are recognized.
For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
because the action for the grouping `X + Y' is to add the numbers
associated with X and Y.
* Menu:
* Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
* Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
* Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
* Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
* Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
action in the middle of a rule.
File: bison.info, Node: Value Type, Next: Multiple Types, Up: Semantics
3.5.1 Data Types of Semantic Values
-----------------------------------
In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
RPN and infix calculator examples (*note Reverse Polish Notation
Calculator: RPN Calc.).
Bison normally uses the type `int' for semantic values if your
program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
specify some other type, define `YYSTYPE' as a macro, like this:
#define YYSTYPE double
`YYSTYPE''s replacement list should be a type name that does not
contain parentheses or square brackets. This macro definition must go
in the prologue of the grammar file (*note Outline of a Bison Grammar:
Grammar Outline.).
File: bison.info, Node: Multiple Types, Next: Actions, Prev: Value Type, Up: Semantics
3.5.2 More Than One Value Type
------------------------------
In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
`int' or `long int', while a string constant needs type `char *', and
an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the symbol table.
To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser,
Bison requires you to do two things:
* Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by
using the `%union' Bison declaration (*note The Collection of
Value Types: Union Decl.), or by using a `typedef' or a `#define'
to define `YYSTYPE' to be a union type whose member names are the
type tags.
* Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or
nonterminal) for which semantic values are used. This is done for
tokens with the `%token' Bison declaration (*note Token Type
Names: Token Decl.) and for groupings with the `%type' Bison
declaration (*note Nonterminal Symbols: Type Decl.).
File: bison.info, Node: Actions, Next: Action Types, Prev: Multiple Types, Up: Semantics
3.5.3 Actions
-------------
An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be
executed each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of
most actions is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by
the rule from the semantic values associated with tokens or smaller
groupings.
An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
placed at any position in the rule; it is executed at that position.
Most rules have just one action at the end of the rule, following all
the components. Actions in the middle of a rule are tricky and used
only for special purposes (*note Actions in Mid-Rule: Mid-Rule
Actions.).
The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
components matched by the rule with the construct `$N', which stands
for the value of the Nth component. The semantic value for the
grouping being constructed is `$$'. In addition, the semantic values
of symbols can be accessed with the named references construct `$NAME'
or `$[NAME]'. Bison translates both of these constructs into
expressions of the appropriate type when it copies the actions into the
parser implementation file. `$$' (or `$NAME', when it stands for the
current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it can be
assigned to.
Here is a typical example:
exp:
...
| exp '+' exp { $$ = $1 + $3; }
Or, in terms of named references:
exp[result]:
...
| exp[left] '+' exp[right] { $result = $left + $right; }
This rule constructs an `exp' from two smaller `exp' groupings
connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, `$1' and `$3' (`$left'
and `$right') refer to the semantic values of the two component `exp'
groupings, which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side
of the rule. The sum is stored into `$$' (`$result') so that it
becomes the semantic value of the addition-expression just recognized
by the rule. If there were a useful semantic value associated with the
`+' token, it could be referred to as `$2'.
*Note Named References::, for more information about using the named
references construct.
Note that the vertical-bar character `|' is really a rule separator,
and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a difference with
tools like Flex, for which `|' stands for either "or", or "the same
action as that of the next rule". In the following example, the action
is triggered only when `b' is found:
a-or-b: 'a'|'b' { a_or_b_found = 1; };
If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
`$$ = $1'. Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule becomes the
value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is valid only
if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default action for
an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action unless the
rule's value does not matter.
`$N' with N zero or negative is allowed for reference to tokens and
groupings on the stack _before_ those that match the current rule.
This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably you must be
certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here is a case in
which you can use this reliably:
foo:
expr bar '+' expr { ... }
| expr bar '-' expr { ... }
;
bar:
/* empty */ { previous_expr = $0; }
;
As long as `bar' is used only in the fashion shown here, `$0' always
refers to the `expr' which precedes `bar' in the definition of `foo'.
It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead
token, if any, from a semantic action. This semantic value is stored
in `yylval'. *Note Special Features for Use in Actions: Action
Features.
File: bison.info, Node: Action Types, Next: Mid-Rule Actions, Prev: Actions, Up: Semantics
3.5.4 Data Types of Values in Actions
-------------------------------------
If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the `$$' and
`$N' constructs always have that data type.
If you have used `%union' to specify a variety of data types, then
you must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or
nonterminal symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you
use `$$' or `$N', its data type is determined by which symbol it refers
to in the rule. In this example,
exp:
...
| exp '+' exp { $$ = $1 + $3; }
`$1' and `$3' refer to instances of `exp', so they all have the data
type declared for the nonterminal symbol `exp'. If `$2' were used, it
would have the data type declared for the terminal symbol `'+'',
whatever that might be.
Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the
value, by inserting `<TYPE>' after the `$' at the beginning of the
reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
%union {
int itype;
double dtype;
}
then you can write `$<itype>1' to refer to the first subunit of the
rule as an integer, or `$<dtype>1' to refer to it as a double.
File: bison.info, Node: Mid-Rule Actions, Prev: Action Types, Up: Semantics
3.5.5 Actions in Mid-Rule
-------------------------
Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
* Menu:
* Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
* Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
* Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
File: bison.info, Node: Using Mid-Rule Actions, Next: Mid-Rule Action Translation, Up: Mid-Rule Actions
3.5.5.1 Using Mid-Rule Actions
..............................
A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using `$N',
but it may not refer to subsequent components because it is run before
they are parsed.
The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the
rule. This makes a difference when there is another action later in
the same rule (and usually there is another at the end): you have to
count the actions along with the symbols when working out which number
N to use in `$N'.
The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can
set its value with an assignment to `$$', and actions later in the rule
can refer to the value using `$N'. Since there is no symbol to name
the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value in
advance, so you must use the `$<...>N' construct to specify a data type
each time you refer to this value.
There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
action, because assignments to `$$' do not have that effect. The only
way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action at
the end of the rule.
Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a `let'
statement that looks like `let (VARIABLE) STATEMENT' and serves to
create a variable named VARIABLE temporarily for the duration of
STATEMENT. To parse this construct, we must put VARIABLE into the
symbol table while STATEMENT is parsed, then remove it afterward. Here
is how it is done:
stmt:
"let" '(' var ')'
{
$<context>$ = push_context ();
declare_variable ($3);
}
stmt
{
$$ = $6;
pop_context ($<context>5);
}
As soon as `let (VARIABLE)' has been recognized, the first action is
run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the list of
accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
`context' in the data-type union. Then it calls `declare_variable' to
add the new variable to that list. Once the first action is finished,
the embedded statement `stmt' can be parsed.
Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the `stmt' is
component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the
readability and maintainability (*note Named References::):
stmt:
"let" '(' var ')'
{
$<context>let = push_context ();
declare_variable ($3);
}[let]
stmt
{
$$ = $6;
pop_context ($<context>let);
}
After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes
the value of the entire `let'-statement. Then the semantic value from
the earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
removes the temporary `let'-variable from the list so that it won't
appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (*note
Error Recovery::) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement
`stmt', it might discard the previous semantic context `$<context>5'
without restoring it. Thus, `$<context>5' needs a destructor (*note
Freeing Discarded Symbols: Destructor Decl.). However, Bison currently
provides no means to declare a destructor specific to a particular
mid-rule action's semantic value.
One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal
symbol and to declare a destructor for that symbol:
%type <context> let
%destructor { pop_context ($$); } let
%%
stmt:
let stmt
{
$$ = $2;
pop_context ($let);
};
let:
"let" '(' var ')'
{
$let = push_context ();
declare_variable ($3);
};
Note that the action is now at the end of its rule. Any mid-rule
action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and this
is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
File: bison.info, Node: Mid-Rule Action Translation, Next: Mid-Rule Conflicts, Prev: Using Mid-Rule Actions, Up: Mid-Rule Actions
3.5.5.2 Mid-Rule Action Translation
...................................
As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into
regular rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison
(textual, graphical, etc., see *note Understanding Your Parser:
Understanding.) reveal this translation, best explained by means of an
example. The following rule:
exp: { a(); } "b" { c(); } { d(); } "e" { f(); };
is translated into:
$@1: /* empty */ { a(); };
$@2: /* empty */ { c(); };
$@3: /* empty */ { d(); };
exp: $@1 "b" $@2 $@3 "e" { f(); };
with new nonterminal symbols `$@N', where N is a number.
A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses `$$', or
the (final) action uses `$N' where N denote the mid-rule action. In
that case its nonterminal is rather named `@N':
exp: { a(); } "b" { $$ = c(); } { d(); } "e" { f = $1; };
is translated into
@1: /* empty */ { a(); };
@2: /* empty */ { $$ = c(); };
$@3: /* empty */ { d(); };
exp: @1 "b" @2 $@3 "e" { f = $1; }
There are probably two errors in the above example: the first
mid-rule action does not generate a value (it does not use `$$'
although the final action uses it), and the value of the second one is
not used (the final action does not use `$3'). Bison reports these
errors when the `midrule-value' warnings are enabled (*note Invoking
Bison: Invocation.):
$ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
exp: { a(); } "b" { $$ = c(); } { d(); } "e" { f = $1; };
^^^^^^^^
mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
exp: { a(); } "b" { $$ = c(); } { d(); } "e" { f = $1; };
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File: bison.info, Node: Mid-Rule Conflicts, Prev: Mid-Rule Action Translation, Up: Mid-Rule Actions
3.5.5.3 Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
.........................................
Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute
the action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule
actions, can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift
the open-brace token and look at what follows before deciding whether
there is a declaration or not:
compound:
'{' declarations statements '}'
| '{' statements '}'
;
But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become
nonfunctional:
compound:
{ prepare_for_local_variables (); }
'{' declarations statements '}'
| '{' statements '}'
;
Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
the "lookahead" token at this time, since the parser is still deciding
what to do about it. *Note Lookahead Tokens: Lookahead.)
You might think that you could correct the problem by putting
identical actions into the two rules, like this:
compound:
{ prepare_for_local_variables (); }
'{' declarations statements '}'
| { prepare_for_local_variables (); }
'{' statements '}'
;
But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two
actions are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in
an action.)
If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution
which does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
compound:
'{' { prepare_for_local_variables (); }
declarations statements '}'
| '{' statements '}'
;
Now the first token of the following declaration or statement, which
would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol
which serves as a subroutine:
subroutine:
/* empty */ { prepare_for_local_variables (); }
;
compound:
subroutine '{' declarations statements '}'
| subroutine '{' statements '}'
;
Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for `subroutine' without
deciding which rule for `compound' it will eventually use.
File: bison.info, Node: Tracking Locations, Next: Named References, Prev: Semantics, Up: Grammar File
3.6 Tracking Locations
======================
Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional
information, especially symbol locations.
The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type,
and actions to take when rules are matched.
* Menu:
* Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
* Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
* Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
File: bison.info, Node: Location Type, Next: Actions and Locations, Up: Tracking Locations
3.6.1 Data Type of Locations
----------------------------
Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic
values, since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
`YYLTYPE', just as you can specify the semantic value type by defining
a `YYSTYPE' macro (*note Value Type::). When `YYLTYPE' is not defined,
Bison uses a default structure type with four members:
typedef struct YYLTYPE
{
int first_line;
int first_column;
int last_line;
int last_column;
} YYLTYPE;
When `YYLTYPE' is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
initializes all these fields to 1 for `yylloc'. To initialize `yylloc'
with a custom location type (or to chose a different initialization),
use the `%initial-action' directive. *Note Performing Actions before
Parsing: Initial Action Decl.
File: bison.info, Node: Actions and Locations, Next: Location Default Action, Prev: Location Type, Up: Tracking Locations
3.6.2 Actions and Locations
---------------------------
Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also
for describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings
is very similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given
rule, several constructs can be used to access the locations of the
elements being matched. The location of the Nth component of the right
hand side is `@N', while the location of the left hand side grouping is
`@$'.
In addition, the named references construct `@NAME' and `@[NAME]'
may also be used to address the symbol locations. *Note Named
References::, for more information about using the named references
construct.
Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
exp:
...
| exp '/' exp
{
@$.first_column = @1.first_column;
@$.first_line = @1.first_line;
@$.last_column = @3.last_column;
@$.last_line = @3.last_line;
if ($3)
$$ = $1 / $3;
else
{
$$ = 1;
fprintf (stderr,
"Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
@3.first_line, @3.first_column,
@3.last_line, @3.last_column);
}
}
As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that
is run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of `@$' to
the beginning of the first symbol, and the end of `@$' to the end of the
last symbol.
With this default action, the location tracking can be fully
automatic. The example above simply rewrites this way:
exp:
...
| exp '/' exp
{
if ($3)
$$ = $1 / $3;
else
{
$$ = 1;
fprintf (stderr,
"Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
@3.first_line, @3.first_column,
@3.last_line, @3.last_column);
}
}
It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token,
if any, from a semantic action. This location is stored in `yylloc'.
*Note Special Features for Use in Actions: Action Features.
File: bison.info, Node: Location Default Action, Prev: Actions and Locations, Up: Tracking Locations
3.6.3 Default Action for Locations
----------------------------------
Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each rule.
The `YYLLOC_DEFAULT' macro is invoked each time a rule is matched,
before the associated action is run. It is also invoked while
processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location. Before
reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR parser invokes
`YYLLOC_DEFAULT' recursively to compute the location of that ambiguity.
Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
dedicated code from semantic actions.
The `YYLLOC_DEFAULT' macro takes three parameters. The first one is
the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of all right
hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third parameter
is the size of the rule's right hand side. When a GLR parser reports
an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate right hand sides it passes to
`YYLLOC_DEFAULT' is undefined. When processing a syntax error, the
second parameter identifies locations of the symbols that were
discarded during error processing, and the third parameter is the
number of discarded symbols.
By default, `YYLLOC_DEFAULT' is defined this way:
# define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
do \
if (N) \
{ \
(Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
(Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
(Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
(Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
} \
else \
{ \
(Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
(Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
} \
while (0)
where `YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)' is the location of the Kth symbol in RHS when
K is positive, and the location of the symbol just before the reduction
when K and N are both zero.
When defining `YYLLOC_DEFAULT', you should consider that:
* All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first
one (the result) should be modified by `YYLLOC_DEFAULT'.
* For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
right hand side range from 1 to N. When N is zero, only 0 is a
valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
During error processing N is always positive.
* Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
File: bison.info, Node: Named References, Next: Declarations, Prev: Tracking Locations, Up: Grammar File
3.7 Named References
====================
As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to
any semantic value or location is a "positional reference", which takes
the form `$N', `$$', `@N', and `@$'. However, such a reference is not
very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to insert or remove
symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need to renumber
such references can be tedious and error-prone.
To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or
location using a "named reference". First of all, original symbol
names may be used as named references. For example:
invocation: op '(' args ')'
{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @invocation); }
Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
invocation: op '(' args ')'
{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @$); }
However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
ambiguities:
exp: exp '/' exp
{ $exp = $exp / $exp; } // $exp is ambiguous.
exp: exp '/' exp
{ $$ = $1 / $exp; } // One usage is ambiguous.
exp: exp '/' exp
{ $$ = $1 / $3; } // No error.
When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values
and locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a
symbol appearance in rule definitions. For example:
exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
{ $result = $left / $right; }
In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
exp[res]: exp[x] '+' {$left = $x;}[left] exp[right]
{ $res = $left + $right; }
In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an
explicit bracketed syntax `$[name]' and `@[name]' must be used:
if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); }
It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash
or other C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
`$name.suffix' as a reference to symbol value `$name' followed by
`.suffix', i.e., an access to the `suffix' field of the semantic value.
In order to force Bison to recognize `name.suffix' in its entirety as
the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax `$[name.suffix]'
must be used.
The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback
will help to stabilize it.
File: bison.info, Node: Declarations, Next: Multiple Parsers, Prev: Named References, Up: Grammar File
3.8 Bison Declarations
======================
The "Bison declarations" section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
*Note Symbols::.
All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
`'+'' and `'*'') must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
value (*note More Than One Value Type: Multiple Types.).
The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol,
by default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
must declare it explicitly (*note Languages and Context-Free Grammars:
Language and Grammar.).
* Menu:
* Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
* Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
* Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
* Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
* Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
* Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
* Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
* Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
* Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
* Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
* Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
* Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
* Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
* %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
* %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
File: bison.info, Node: Require Decl, Next: Token Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.1 Require a Version of Bison
--------------------------------
You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
the requirement is not met, `bison' exits with an error (exit status
63).
%require "VERSION"
File: bison.info, Node: Token Decl, Next: Precedence Decl, Prev: Require Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.2 Token Type Names
----------------------
The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as
follows:
%token NAME
Bison will convert this into a `#define' directive in the parser, so
that the function `yylex' (if it is in this file) can use the name NAME
to stand for this token type's code.
Alternatively, you can use `%left', `%right', or `%nonassoc' instead
of `%token', if you wish to specify associativity and precedence.
*Note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.
You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by
appending a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the
field immediately following the token name:
%token NUM 300
%token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't
conflict with each other or with normal characters.
In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
`%token' or other token declaration to include the data type
alternative delimited by angle-brackets (*note More Than One Value
Type: Multiple Types.).
For example:
%union { /* define stack type */
double val;
symrec *tptr;
}
%token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
writing the literal string at the end of a `%token' declaration which
declares the name. For example:
%token arrow "=>"
For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
equivalent literal string tokens:
%token <operator> OR "||"
%token <operator> LE 134 "<="
%left OR "<="
Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
`yylex' function can use the token name or the literal string to obtain
the token type code number (*note Calling Convention::). Syntax error
messages passed to `yyerror' from the parser will reference the literal
string instead of the token name.
The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following
line allows for nicer error messages referring to "end of file" instead
of "$end":
%token END 0 "end of file"
File: bison.info, Node: Precedence Decl, Next: Union Decl, Prev: Token Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.3 Operator Precedence
-------------------------
Use the `%left', `%right' or `%nonassoc' declaration to declare a token
and specify its precedence and associativity, all at once. These are
called "precedence declarations". *Note Operator Precedence:
Precedence, for general information on operator precedence.
The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
`%token': either
%left SYMBOLS...
or
%left <TYPE> SYMBOLS...
And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of `%token'.
But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence
for all the SYMBOLS:
* The associativity of an operator OP determines how repeated uses
of the operator nest: whether `X OP Y OP Z' is parsed by grouping
X with Y first or by grouping Y with Z first. `%left' specifies
left-associativity (grouping X with Y first) and `%right'
specifies right-associativity (grouping Y with Z first).
`%nonassoc' specifies no associativity, which means that `X OP Y
OP Z' is considered a syntax error.
* The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other
operators. All the tokens declared in a single precedence
declaration have equal precedence and nest together according to
their associativity. When two tokens declared in different
precedence declarations associate, the one declared later has the
higher precedence and is grouped first.
For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between
the argument lists of `%token' and precedence declarations. Only a
`%token' can associate a literal string with a token type name. A
precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a
reference to a separate token. For example:
%left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
%left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
File: bison.info, Node: Union Decl, Next: Type Decl, Prev: Precedence Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.4 The Collection of Value Types
-----------------------------------
The `%union' declaration specifies the entire collection of possible
data types for semantic values. The keyword `%union' is followed by
braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a `union' in C.
For example:
%union {
double val;
symrec *tptr;
}
This says that the two alternative types are `double' and `symrec *'.
They are given names `val' and `tptr'; these names are used in the
`%token' and `%type' declarations to pick one of the types for a
terminal or nonterminal symbol (*note Nonterminal Symbols: Type Decl.).
As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the `union'. For
example:
%union value {
double val;
symrec *tptr;
}
specifies the union tag `value', so the corresponding C type is `union
value'. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to `YYSTYPE'.
As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple `%union'
declarations; their contents are concatenated. However, only the first
`%union' declaration can specify a tag.
Note that, unlike making a `union' declaration in C, you need not
write a semicolon after the closing brace.
Instead of `%union', you can define and use your own union type
`YYSTYPE' if your grammar contains at least one `<TYPE>' tag. For
example, you can put the following into a header file `parser.h':
union YYSTYPE {
double val;
symrec *tptr;
};
typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
and then your grammar can use the following instead of `%union':
%{
#include "parser.h"
%}
%type <val> expr
%token <tptr> ID
File: bison.info, Node: Type Decl, Next: Initial Action Decl, Prev: Union Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.5 Nonterminal Symbols
-------------------------
When you use `%union' to specify multiple value types, you must declare
the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are used.
This is done with a `%type' declaration, like this:
%type <TYPE> NONTERMINAL...
Here NONTERMINAL is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and TYPE is the
name given in the `%union' to the alternative that you want (*note The
Collection of Value Types: Union Decl.). You can give any number of
nonterminal symbols in the same `%type' declaration, if they have the
same value type. Use spaces to separate the symbol names.
You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do
this, use the same `<TYPE>' construction in a declaration for the
terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow `<TYPE>'.
File: bison.info, Node: Initial Action Decl, Next: Destructor Decl, Prev: Type Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.6 Performing Actions before Parsing
---------------------------------------
Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
parsing. The `%initial-action' directive allows for such arbitrary
code.
-- Directive: %initial-action { CODE }
Declare that the braced CODE must be invoked before parsing each
time `yyparse' is called. The CODE may use `$$' (or `$<TAG>$')
and `@$' -- initial value and location of the lookahead -- and the
`%parse-param'.
For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
%parse-param { char const *file_name };
%initial-action
{
@$.initialize (file_name);
};
File: bison.info, Node: Destructor Decl, Next: Printer Decl, Prev: Initial Action Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.7 Freeing Discarded Symbols
-------------------------------
During error recovery (*note Error Recovery::), symbols already pushed
on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
or if it returns via `YYABORT' or `YYACCEPT', all the symbols on the
stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it must discard
the start symbol.
When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
The `%destructor' directive defines code that is called when a
symbol is automatically discarded.
-- Directive: %destructor { CODE } SYMBOLS
Invoke the braced CODE whenever the parser discards one of the
SYMBOLS. Within CODE, `$$' (or `$<TAG>$') designates the semantic
value associated with the discarded symbol, and `@$' designates
its location. The additional parser parameters are also available
(*note The Parser Function `yyparse': Parser Function.).
When a symbol is listed among SYMBOLS, its `%destructor' is called
a per-symbol `%destructor'. You may also define a per-type
`%destructor' by listing a semantic type tag among SYMBOLS. In
that case, the parser will invoke this CODE whenever it discards
any grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that
symbol has its own per-symbol `%destructor'.
Finally, you can define two different kinds of default
`%destructor's. (These default forms are experimental. More user
feedback will help to determine whether they should become
permanent features.) You can place each of `<*>' and `<>' in the
SYMBOLS list of exactly one `%destructor' declaration in your
grammar file. The parser will invoke the CODE associated with one
of these whenever it discards any user-defined grammar symbol that
has no per-symbol and no per-type `%destructor'. The parser uses
the CODE for `<*>' in the case of such a grammar symbol for which
you have formally declared a semantic type tag (`%type' counts as
such a declaration, but `$<tag>$' does not). The parser uses the
CODE for `<>' in the case of such a grammar symbol that has no
declared semantic type tag.
For example:
%union { char *string; }
%token <string> STRING1
%token <string> STRING2
%type <string> string1
%type <string> string2
%union { char character; }
%token <character> CHR
%type <character> chr
%token TAGLESS
%destructor { } <character>
%destructor { free ($$); } <*>
%destructor { free ($$); printf ("%d", @$.first_line); } STRING1 string1
%destructor { printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); } <>
guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that
has a semantic type tag other than `<character>', it passes its
semantic value to `free' by default. However, when the parser discards
a `STRING1' or a `string1', it also prints its line number to `stdout'.
It performs only the second `%destructor' in this case, so it invokes
`free' only once. Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever
it discards any symbol, such as `TAGLESS', that has no semantic type
tag.
A Bison-generated parser invokes the default `%destructor's only for
user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols. For example, the
parser will not invoke either kind of default `%destructor' for the
special Bison-defined symbols `$accept', `$undefined', or `$end' (*note
Bison Symbols: Table of Symbols.), none of which you can reference in
your grammar. It also will not invoke either for the `error' token
(*note error: Table of Symbols.), which is always defined by Bison
regardless of whether you reference it in your grammar. However, it
may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you redefine it
from `$end' to, for example, `END':
%token END 0
Finally, Bison will never invoke a `%destructor' for an unreferenced
mid-rule semantic value (*note Actions in Mid-Rule: Mid-Rule Actions.).
That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if
you do not reference `$$' in the mid-rule's action or `$N' (where N is
the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later
action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
Bison-generated parser will invoke the `<>' `%destructor' whenever it
discards the mid-rule symbol.
"Discarded symbols" are the following:
* stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
* incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
* the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
* the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current
right-hand side symbols) when the C++ parser (`lalr1.cc') catches
an exception in `parse',
* the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
The parser can "return immediately" because of an explicit call to
`YYABORT' or `YYACCEPT', or failed error recovery, or memory exhaustion.
Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
error via `YYERROR' are not discarded automatically. As a rule of
thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage the
memory.
File: bison.info, Node: Printer Decl, Next: Expect Decl, Prev: Destructor Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.8 Printing Semantic Values
------------------------------
When run-time traces are enabled (*note Tracing Your Parser: Tracing.),
the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol
involved in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the
parser cannot know how semantic values should be formatted.
The `%printer' directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
reported. Its syntax is the same as `%destructor' (*note Freeing
Discarded Symbols: Destructor Decl.).
-- Directive: %printer { CODE } SYMBOLS
Invoke the braced CODE whenever the parser displays one of the
SYMBOLS. Within CODE, `yyoutput' denotes the output stream (a
`FILE*' in C, and an `std::ostream&' in C++), `$$' (or `$<TAG>$')
designates the semantic value associated with the symbol, and `@$'
its location. The additional parser parameters are also available
(*note The Parser Function `yyparse': Parser Function.).
The SYMBOLS are defined as for `%destructor' (*note Freeing
Discarded Symbols: Destructor Decl.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
`<ival>'), per-symbol (e.g., `exp', `NUM', `"float"'), typed
per-default (i.e., `<*>', or untyped per-default (i.e., `<>').
For example:
%union { char *string; }
%token <string> STRING1
%token <string> STRING2
%type <string> string1
%type <string> string2
%union { char character; }
%token <character> CHR
%type <character> chr
%token TAGLESS
%printer { fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); } <character>
%printer { fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); } <*>
%printer { fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); } STRING1 string1
%printer { fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); } <>
guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic
type tag other than `<character>', it display the address of the
semantic value by default. However, when the parser displays a
`STRING1' or a `string1', it formats it as a string in double quotes.
It performs only the second `%printer' in this case, so it prints only
once. Finally, the parser print `<>' for any symbol, such as `TAGLESS',
that has no semantic type tag. See also
File: bison.info, Node: Expect Decl, Next: Start Decl, Prev: Printer Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.9 Suppressing Conflict Warnings
-----------------------------------
Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar (*note
Shift/Reduce Conflicts: Shift/Reduce.), but most real grammars have
harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable way
and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress the
warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts changes.
You can do this with the `%expect' declaration.
The declaration looks like this:
%expect N
Here N is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should be N
shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts. Bison reports
an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs from N, or if
there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more serious,
and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR parsers, however,
both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise, there would be no need
to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is also possible to specify an
expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts in GLR parsers, using the
declaration:
%expect-rr N
In general, using `%expect' involves these steps:
* Compile your grammar without `%expect'. Use the `-v' option to
get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
print the number of conflicts.
* Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar
and go back to the beginning.
* Add an `%expect' declaration, copying the number N from the number
which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an `%expect-rr'
declaration as well.
Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected
conflict, but will keep silent otherwise.
File: bison.info, Node: Start Decl, Next: Pure Decl, Prev: Expect Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.10 The Start-Symbol
-----------------------
Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the
first nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The
programmer may override this restriction with the `%start' declaration
as follows:
%start SYMBOL
File: bison.info, Node: Pure Decl, Next: Push Decl, Prev: Start Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.11 A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
--------------------------------
A "reentrant" program is one which does not alter in the course of
execution; in other words, it consists entirely of "pure" (read-only)
code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is
possible; for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call
from a signal handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a
nonreentrant program must be called only within interlocks.
Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
statically allocated variables for communication with `yylex',
including `yylval' and `yylloc'.)
Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
declaration `%define api.pure' says that you want the parser to be
reentrant. It looks like this:
%define api.pure full
The result is that the communication variables `yylval' and `yylloc'
become local variables in `yyparse', and a different calling convention
is used for the lexical analyzer function `yylex'. *Note Calling
Conventions for Pure Parsers: Pure Calling, for the details of this.
The variable `yynerrs' becomes local in `yyparse' in pull mode but it
becomes a member of yypstate in push mode. (*note The Error Reporting
Function `yyerror': Error Reporting.). The convention for calling
`yyparse' itself is unchanged.
Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
valid grammar.
File: bison.info, Node: Push Decl, Next: Decl Summary, Prev: Pure Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.12 A Push Parser
--------------------
(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called each
time a new token is made available.
A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a main
event loop in the client's application. This is typically a
requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
within a certain time period.
Normally, Bison generates a pull parser. The following Bison
declaration says that you want the parser to be a push parser (*note
api.push-pull: %define Summary.):
%define api.push-pull push
In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
a pure parser (*note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.). The only
time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
%define api.pure full
%define api.push-pull push
There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push
parser and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push
parser to have many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in
memory at the same time. An impure push parser should only use one
parser at a time.
When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols
in the generated parser. `yypstate' is a structure that the generated
parser uses to store the parser's state. `yypstate_new' is the
function that will create a new parser instance. `yypstate_delete'
will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser
instance. Finally, `yypush_parse' is the function that should be
called whenever a token is available to provide the parser. A trivial
example of using a pure push parser would look like this:
int status;
yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
do {
status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
yypstate_delete (ps);
If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
the generated parser will change. The `yychar' variable becomes a
global variable instead of a variable in the `yypush_parse' function.
For this reason, the signature of the `yypush_parse' function is
changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
example would thus look like this:
extern int yychar;
int status;
yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
do {
yychar = yylex ();
status = yypush_parse (ps);
} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
yypstate_delete (ps);
That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable
`yychar' for use by the next invocation of the `yypush_parse' function.
Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the
pull parser interface in the same generated parser. In order to get
this functionality, you should replace the `%define api.push-pull push'
declaration with the `%define api.push-pull both' declaration. Doing
this will create all of the symbols mentioned earlier along with the
two extra symbols, `yyparse' and `yypull_parse'. `yyparse' can be used
exactly as it normally would be used. However, the user should note
that it is implemented in the generated parser by calling
`yypull_parse'. This makes the `yyparse' function that is generated
with the `%define api.push-pull both' declaration slower than the normal
`yyparse' function. If the user calls the `yypull_parse' function it
will parse the rest of the input stream. It is possible to
`yypush_parse' tokens to select a subgrammar and then `yypull_parse'
the rest of the input stream. If you would like to switch back and
forth between between parsing styles, you would have to write your own
`yypull_parse' function that knows when to quit looking for input. An
example of using the `yypull_parse' function would look like this:
yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
yypstate_delete (ps);
Adding the `%define api.pure full' declaration does exactly the same
thing to the generated parser with `%define api.push-pull both' as it
did for `%define api.push-pull push'.
File: bison.info, Node: Decl Summary, Next: %define Summary, Prev: Push Decl, Up: Declarations
3.8.13 Bison Declaration Summary
--------------------------------
Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
-- Directive: %union
Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
(*note The Collection of Value Types: Union Decl.).
-- Directive: %token
Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence or
associativity specified (*note Token Type Names: Token Decl.).
-- Directive: %right
Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is
right-associative (*note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.).
-- Directive: %left
Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is
left-associative (*note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.).
-- Directive: %nonassoc
Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
(*note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.). Using it in a way
that would be associative is a syntax error.
-- Directive: %type
Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
(*note Nonterminal Symbols: Type Decl.).
-- Directive: %start
Specify the grammar's start symbol (*note The Start-Symbol: Start
Decl.).
-- Directive: %expect
Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts (*note
Suppressing Conflict Warnings: Expect Decl.).
In order to change the behavior of `bison', use the following
directives:
-- Directive: %code {CODE}
-- Directive: %code QUALIFIER {CODE}
Insert CODE verbatim into the output parser source at the default
location or at the location specified by QUALIFIER. *Note %code
Summary::.
-- Directive: %debug
In the parser implementation file, define the macro `YYDEBUG' (or
`PREFIXDEBUG' with `%define api.prefix PREFIX', see *note Multiple
Parsers in the Same Program: Multiple Parsers.) to 1 if it is not
already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
*Note Tracing Your Parser: Tracing.
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE VALUE
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE "VALUE"
Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. *Note %define
Summary::.
-- Directive: %defines
Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the
token type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other
declarations. If the parser implementation file is named `NAME.c'
then the parser header file is named `NAME.h'.
For C parsers, the parser header file declares `YYSTYPE' unless
`YYSTYPE' is already defined as a macro or you have used a
`<TYPE>' tag without using `%union'. Therefore, if you are using
a `%union' (*note More Than One Value Type: Multiple Types.) with
components that require other definitions, or if you have defined
a `YYSTYPE' macro or type definition (*note Data Types of Semantic
Values: Value Type.), you need to arrange for these definitions to
be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in a
prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
other module that needs `YYSTYPE'.
Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
`yylval' as an external variable. *Note A Pure (Reentrant)
Parser: Pure Decl.
If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
`YYLTYPE' and `yylloc' using a protocol similar to that of the
`YYSTYPE' macro and `yylval'. *Note Tracking Locations::.
This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put
the definition of `yylex' in a separate source file, because
`yylex' typically needs to be able to refer to the above-mentioned
declarations and to the token type codes. *Note Semantic Values
of Tokens: Token Values.
If you have declared `%code requires' or `%code provides', the
output header also contains their code. *Note %code Summary::.
The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with
a C preprocessor guard: `YY_PREFIX_FILE_INCLUDED', where PREFIX
and FILE are the prefix (*note Multiple Parsers in the Same
Program: Multiple Parsers.) and generated file name turned
uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters
converted to a single underscore.
For instance with `%define api.prefix "calc"' and `%defines
"lib/parse.h"', the header will be guarded as follows.
#ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
# define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
...
#endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
-- Directive: %defines DEFINES-FILE
Same as above, but save in the file DEFINES-FILE.
-- Directive: %destructor
Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
discarded symbols. *Note Freeing Discarded Symbols: Destructor
Decl.
-- Directive: %file-prefix "PREFIX"
Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
are chosen as if the grammar file were named `PREFIX.y'.
-- Directive: %language "LANGUAGE"
Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java. LANGUAGE
is case-insensitive.
-- Directive: %locations
Generate the code processing the locations (*note Special Features
for Use in Actions: Action Features.). This mode is enabled as
soon as the grammar uses the special `@N' tokens, but if your
grammar does not use it, using `%locations' allows for more
accurate syntax error messages.
-- Directive: %no-lines
Don't generate any `#line' preprocessor commands in the parser
implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers
will associate errors and object code with your source file (the
grammar file). This directive causes them to associate errors
with the parser implementation file, treating it as an independent
source file in its own right.
-- Directive: %output "FILE"
Specify FILE for the parser implementation file.
-- Directive: %pure-parser
Deprecated version of `%define api.pure' (*note api.pure: %define
Summary.), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
unreasonable usage.
-- Directive: %require "VERSION"
Require version VERSION or higher of Bison. *Note Require a
Version of Bison: Require Decl.
-- Directive: %skeleton "FILE"
Specify the skeleton to use.
If FILE does not contain a `/', FILE is the name of a skeleton
file in the Bison installation directory. If it does, FILE is an
absolute file name or a file name relative to the directory of the
grammar file. This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
-- Directive: %token-table
Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
The name of the array is `yytname'; `yytname[I]' is the name of
the token whose internal Bison token code number is I. The first
three elements of `yytname' correspond to the predefined tokens
`"$end"', `"error"', and `"$undefined"'; after these come the
symbols defined in the grammar file.
The name in the table includes all the characters needed to
represent the token in Bison. For single-character literals and
literal strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters
and any escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character
literal `'+'' corresponds to a three-character name, represented
in C as `"'+'"'; and the Bison two-character literal string `"\\/"'
corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
`"\"\\\\/\""'.
When you specify `%token-table', Bison also generates macro
definitions for macros `YYNTOKENS', `YYNNTS', and `YYNRULES', and
`YYNSTATES':
`YYNTOKENS'
The highest token number, plus one.
`YYNNTS'
The number of nonterminal symbols.
`YYNRULES'
The number of grammar rules,
`YYNSTATES'
The number of parser states (*note Parser States::).
-- Directive: %verbose
Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
that state. *Note Understanding Your Parser: Understanding, for
more information.
-- Directive: %yacc
Pretend the option `--yacc' was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
including its naming conventions. *Note Bison Options::, for more.
File: bison.info, Node: %define Summary, Next: %code Summary, Prev: Decl Summary, Up: Declarations
3.8.14 %define Summary
----------------------
There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
`%start', which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such features
are associated with variables, which are assigned by the `%define'
directive:
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE VALUE
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE "VALUE"
Define VARIABLE to VALUE.
VALUE must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial
dash or digit. Omitting `"VALUE"' entirely is always equivalent
to specifying `""'.
It is an error if a VARIABLE is defined by `%define' multiple
times, but see *note -D NAME[=VALUE]: Bison Options.
The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
`%define' accepts.
Some VARIABLEs take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
four conditions:
1. `VALUE' is `true'
2. `VALUE' is omitted (or `""' is specified). This is equivalent to
`true'.
3. `VALUE' is `false'.
4. VARIABLE is never defined. In this case, Bison selects a default
value.
What VARIABLEs are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
skeleton (*note %language: Decl Summary, *note %skeleton: Decl
Summary.). Unaccepted VARIABLEs produce an error. Some of the
accepted VARIABLEs are:
* `api.location.type'
* Language(s): C++, Java
* Purpose: Define the location type. *Note User Defined
Location Type::.
* Accepted Values: String
* Default Value: none
* History: introduced in Bison 2.7
* `api.prefix'
* Language(s): All
* Purpose: Rename exported symbols. *Note Multiple Parsers in
the Same Program: Multiple Parsers.
* Accepted Values: String
* Default Value: `yy'
* History: introduced in Bison 2.6
* `api.pure'
* Language(s): C
* Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program. *Note A
Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.
* Accepted Values: `true', `false', `full'
The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying
`true', as is the case for Boolean values.
When `%define api.pure full' is used, the parser is made
reentrant. This changes the signature for `yylex' (*note Pure
Calling::), and also that of `yyerror' when the tracking of
locations has been activated, as shown below.
The `true' value is very similar to the `full' value, the only
difference is in the signature of `yyerror' on Yacc parsers
without `%parse-param', for historical reasons.
I.e., if `%locations %define api.pure' is passed then the
prototypes for `yyerror' are:
void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
But if `%locations %define api.pure %parse-param {int
*nastiness}' is used, then both parsers have the same
signature:
void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
(*note The Error Reporting Function `yyerror': Error
Reporting.)
* Default Value: `false'
* History: the `full' value was introduced in Bison 2.7
* `api.push-pull'
* Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
* Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
*Note A Push Parser: Push Decl. (The current push parsing
interface is experimental and may evolve. More user feedback
will help to stabilize it.)
* Accepted Values: `pull', `push', `both'
* Default Value: `pull'
* `lr.default-reductions'
* Language(s): all
* Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
contain default reductions. *Note Default Reductions::.
(The ability to specify where default reductions should be
used is experimental. More user feedback will help to
stabilize it.)
* Accepted Values: `most', `consistent', `accepting'
* Default Value:
* `accepting' if `lr.type' is `canonical-lr'.
* `most' otherwise.
* `lr.keep-unreachable-states'
* Language(s): all
* Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
remain in the parser tables. *Note Unreachable States::.
* Accepted Values: Boolean
* Default Value: `false'
* `lr.type'
* Language(s): all
* Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1)
family. *Note LR Table Construction::. (This feature is
experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
* Accepted Values: `lalr', `ielr', `canonical-lr'
* Default Value: `lalr'
* `namespace'
* Languages(s): C++
* Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class. For
example, if you specify:
%define namespace "foo::bar"
Bison uses `foo::bar' verbatim in references such as:
foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading `::'
and then splits on any remaining occurrences:
namespace foo { namespace bar {
class position;
class location;
} }
* Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace
reference without a trailing `"::"'. For example, `"foo"' or
`"::foo::bar"'.
* Default Value: The value specified by `%name-prefix', which
defaults to `yy'. This usage of `%name-prefix' is for
backward compatibility and can be confusing since
`%name-prefix' also specifies the textual prefix for the
lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
`%name-prefix', it is best to also specify `%define
namespace' so that `%name-prefix' _only_ affects the lexical
analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
%define namespace "foo"
%name-prefix "bar::"
The parser namespace is `foo' and `yylex' is referenced as
`bar::lex'.
* `parse.lac'
* Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
* Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve syntax
error handling. *Note LAC::.
* Accepted Values: `none', `full'
* Default Value: `none'
File: bison.info, Node: %code Summary, Prev: %define Summary, Up: Declarations
3.8.15 %code Summary
--------------------
The `%code' directive inserts code verbatim into the output parser
source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves as a
flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
prologue, `%{CODE%}'. This section summarizes the functionality of
`%code' for the various target languages supported by Bison. For a
detailed discussion of how to use `%code' in place of `%{CODE%}' for
C/C++ and why it is advantageous to do so, *note Prologue
Alternatives::.
-- Directive: %code {CODE}
This is the unqualified form of the `%code' directive. It inserts
CODE verbatim at a language-dependent default location in the
parser implementation.
For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
unqualified form replaces `%{CODE%}' for most purposes.
For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
-- Directive: %code QUALIFIER {CODE}
This is the qualified form of the `%code' directive. QUALIFIER
identifies the purpose of CODE and thus the location(s) where
Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to specify
location-sensitive CODE that does not belong at the default
location selected by the unqualified `%code' form, use this form
instead.
For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there
are multiple occurrences of the `%code' directive, Bison concatenates
the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar file.
Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
* requires
* Language(s): C, C++
* Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code
required for `YYSTYPE' and `YYLTYPE'. In other words, it's
the best place to define types referenced in `%union'
directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's
default `YYSTYPE' and `YYLTYPE' definitions.
* Location(s): The parser header file and the parser
implementation file before the Bison-generated `YYSTYPE' and
`YYLTYPE' definitions.
* provides
* Language(s): C, C++
* Purpose: This is the best place to write additional
definitions and declarations that should be provided to other
modules.
* Location(s): The parser header file and the parser
implementation file after the Bison-generated `YYSTYPE',
`YYLTYPE', and token definitions.
* top
* Language(s): C, C++
* Purpose: The unqualified `%code' or `%code requires' should
usually be more appropriate than `%code top'. However,
occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the
top of the parser implementation file. For example:
%code top {
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
}
* Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
* imports
* Language(s): Java
* Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import
directives.
* Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package
directive and before any class definitions.
Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they
are technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior of
the standard Bison skeletons.
File: bison.info, Node: Multiple Parsers, Prev: Declarations, Up: Grammar File
3.9 Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
========================================
Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore
contain only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than
one language with the same program? Then you need to avoid name
conflicts between different definitions of functions and variables such
as `yyparse', `yylval'. To use different parsers from the same
compilation unit, you also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros
(e.g., `YYSTYPE') exported in the generated header.
The easy way to do this is to define the `%define' variable
`api.prefix'. With different `api.prefix's it is guaranteed that
headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled
objects can be linked together too. Specifying `%define api.prefix
PREFIX' (or passing the option `-Dapi.prefix=PREFIX', see *note
Invoking Bison: Invocation.) renames the interface functions and
variables of the Bison parser to start with PREFIX instead of `yy', and
all the macros to start by PREFIX (i.e., PREFIX upper-cased) instead of
`YY'.
The renamed symbols include `yyparse', `yylex', `yyerror',
`yynerrs', `yylval', `yylloc', `yychar' and `yydebug'. If you use a
push parser, `yypush_parse', `yypull_parse', `yypstate', `yypstate_new'
and `yypstate_delete' will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
`YYSTYPE', `YYLTYPE', and `YYDEBUG', which is treated specifically --
more about this below.
For example, if you use `%define api.prefix c', the names become
`cparse', `clex', ..., `CSTYPE', `CLTYPE', and so on.
The `%define' variable `api.prefix' works in two different ways. In
the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
beginning of the parser implementation file, defining `yyparse' as
`PREFIXparse', and so on:
#define YYSTYPE CTYPE
#define yyparse cparse
#define yylval clval
...
YYSTYPE yylval;
int yyparse (void);
This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire
parser implementation file, thus the "original" names (`yylex',
`YYSTYPE', ...) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed,
for instance:
extern CSTYPE clval;
int cparse (void);
The macro `YYDEBUG' is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
parsers. To comply with this tradition, when `api.prefix' is used,
`YYDEBUG' (not renamed) is used as a default value:
/* Enabling traces. */
#ifndef CDEBUG
# if defined YYDEBUG
# if YYDEBUG
# define CDEBUG 1
# else
# define CDEBUG 0
# endif
# else
# define CDEBUG 0
# endif
#endif
#if CDEBUG
extern int cdebug;
#endif
Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to `api.prefix' was provided by
the obsolete directive `%name-prefix' (*note Bison Symbols: Table of
Symbols.) and the option `--name-prefix' (*note Bison Options::).
File: bison.info, Node: Interface, Next: Algorithm, Prev: Grammar File, Up: Top
4 Parser C-Language Interface
*****************************
The Bison parser is actually a C function named `yyparse'. Here we
describe the interface conventions of `yyparse' and the other functions
that it needs to use.
Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
`yy' and `YY' for internal purposes. If you use such an identifier
(aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue in the
grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
* Menu:
* Parser Function:: How to call `yyparse' and what it returns.
* Push Parser Function:: How to call `yypush_parse' and what it returns.
* Pull Parser Function:: How to call `yypull_parse' and what it returns.
* Parser Create Function:: How to call `yypstate_new' and what it returns.
* Parser Delete Function:: How to call `yypstate_delete' and what it returns.
* Lexical:: You must supply a function `yylex'
which reads tokens.
* Error Reporting:: You must supply a function `yyerror'.
* Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
* Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
native language.
File: bison.info, Node: Parser Function, Next: Push Parser Function, Up: Interface
4.1 The Parser Function `yyparse'
=================================
You call the function `yyparse' to cause parsing to occur. This
function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
write an action which directs `yyparse' to return immediately without
reading further.
-- Function: int yyparse (void)
The value returned by `yyparse' is 0 if parsing was successful
(return is due to end-of-input).
The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e.,
input that contains a syntax error or that causes `YYABORT' to be
invoked.
The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
In an action, you can cause immediate return from `yyparse' by using
these macros:
-- Macro: YYACCEPT
Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
-- Macro: YYABORT
Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
declaration `%parse-param':
-- Directive: %parse-param {ARGUMENT-DECLARATION}
Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
ARGUMENT-DECLARATION is an additional `yyparse' argument. The
ARGUMENT-DECLARATION is used when declaring functions or
prototypes. The last identifier in ARGUMENT-DECLARATION must be
the argument name.
Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
%parse-param {int *nastiness}
%parse-param {int *randomness}
Then call the parser like this:
{
int nastiness, randomness;
... /* Store proper data in `nastiness' and `randomness'. */
value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
...
}
In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
exp: ... { ...; *randomness += 1; ... }
Using the following:
%parse-param {int *randomness}
Results in these signatures:
void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
int yyparse (int *randomness);
Or, if both `%define api.pure full' (or just `%define api.pure') and
`%locations' are used:
void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
int yyparse (int *randomness);
File: bison.info, Node: Push Parser Function, Next: Pull Parser Function, Prev: Parser Function, Up: Interface
4.2 The Push Parser Function `yypush_parse'
===========================================
(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
You call the function `yypush_parse' to parse a single token. This
function is available if either the `%define api.push-pull push' or
`%define api.push-pull both' declaration is used. *Note A Push Parser:
Push Decl.
-- Function: int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
The value returned by `yypush_parse' is the same as for yyparse
with the following exception: it returns `YYPUSH_MORE' if more
input is required to finish parsing the grammar.
File: bison.info, Node: Pull Parser Function, Next: Parser Create Function, Prev: Push Parser Function, Up: Interface
4.3 The Pull Parser Function `yypull_parse'
===========================================
(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
You call the function `yypull_parse' to parse the rest of the input
stream. This function is available if the `%define api.push-pull both'
declaration is used. *Note A Push Parser: Push Decl.
-- Function: int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
The value returned by `yypull_parse' is the same as for `yyparse'.
File: bison.info, Node: Parser Create Function, Next: Parser Delete Function, Prev: Pull Parser Function, Up: Interface
4.4 The Parser Create Function `yystate_new'
============================================
(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
You call the function `yypstate_new' to create a new parser instance.
This function is available if either the `%define api.push-pull push' or
`%define api.push-pull both' declaration is used. *Note A Push Parser:
Push Decl.
-- Function: yypstate* yypstate_new (void)
The function will return a valid parser instance if there was
memory available or 0 if no memory was available. In impure mode,
it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently allocated.
File: bison.info, Node: Parser Delete Function, Next: Lexical, Prev: Parser Create Function, Up: Interface
4.5 The Parser Delete Function `yystate_delete'
===============================================
(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
You call the function `yypstate_delete' to delete a parser instance.
function is available if either the `%define api.push-pull push' or
`%define api.push-pull both' declaration is used. *Note A Push Parser:
Push Decl.
-- Function: void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser
instance. After this call, you should no longer attempt to use
the parser instance.
File: bison.info, Node: Lexical, Next: Error Reporting, Prev: Parser Delete Function, Up: Interface
4.6 The Lexical Analyzer Function `yylex'
=========================================
The "lexical analyzer" function, `yylex', recognizes tokens from the
input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
this function automatically; you must write it so that `yyparse' can
call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
In simple programs, `yylex' is often defined at the end of the Bison
grammar file. If `yylex' is defined in a separate source file, you
need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available
there. To do this, use the `-d' option when you run Bison, so that it
will write these macro definitions into the separate parser header
file, `NAME.tab.h', which you can include in the other source files
that need it. *Note Invoking Bison: Invocation.
* Menu:
* Calling Convention:: How `yyparse' calls `yylex'.
* Token Values:: How `yylex' must return the semantic value
of the token it has read.
* Token Locations:: How `yylex' must return the text location
(line number, etc.) of the token, if the
actions want that.
* Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
(*note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.).
File: bison.info, Node: Calling Convention, Next: Token Values, Up: Lexical
4.6.1 Calling Convention for `yylex'
------------------------------------
The value that `yylex' returns must be the positive numeric code for
the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value signifies
end-of-input.
When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition is
the proper numeric code for that token type. So `yylex' can use the
name to indicate that type. *Note Symbols::.
When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character
literal, the numeric code for that character is also the code for the
token type. So `yylex' can simply return that character code, possibly
converted to `unsigned char' to avoid sign-extension. The null
character must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
signifies end-of-input.
Here is an example showing these things:
int
yylex (void)
{
...
if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
return 0;
...
if (c == '+' || c == '-')
return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
...
return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
...
}
This interface has been designed so that the output from the `lex'
utility can be used without change as the definition of `yylex'.
If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
`yylex' can determine the token type codes for them:
* If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
literal string tokens, `yylex' can use these symbolic names like
all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
the grammar file has no effect on `yylex'.
* `yylex' can find the multicharacter token in the `yytname' table.
The index of the token in the table is the token type's code. The
name of a multicharacter token is recorded in `yytname' with a
double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote.
The token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as
input to Bison.
Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in `yytname',
assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
`token_buffer', and assuming that the token does not contain any
characters like `"' that require escaping.
for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
{
if (yytname[i] != 0
&& yytname[i][0] == '"'
&& ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
strlen (token_buffer))
&& yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
&& yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
break;
}
The `yytname' table is generated only if you use the
`%token-table' declaration. *Note Decl Summary::.
File: bison.info, Node: Token Values, Next: Token Locations, Prev: Calling Convention, Up: Lexical
4.6.2 Semantic Values of Tokens
-------------------------------
In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token
must be stored into the global variable `yylval'. When you are using
just one data type for semantic values, `yylval' has that type. Thus,
if the type is `int' (the default), you might write this in `yylex':
...
yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
...
When you are using multiple data types, `yylval''s type is a union
made from the `%union' declaration (*note The Collection of Value
Types: Union Decl.). So when you store a token's value, you must use
the proper member of the union. If the `%union' declaration looks like
this:
%union {
int intval;
double val;
symrec *tptr;
}
then the code in `yylex' might look like this:
...
yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
...
File: bison.info, Node: Token Locations, Next: Pure Calling, Prev: Token Values, Up: Lexical
4.6.3 Textual Locations of Tokens
---------------------------------
If you are using the `@N'-feature (*note Tracking Locations::) in
actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
then you must provide this information in `yylex'. The function
`yyparse' expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
in the global variable `yylloc'. So `yylex' must store the proper data
in that variable.
By default, the value of `yylloc' is a structure and you need only
initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
four members are called `first_line', `first_column', `last_line' and
`last_column'. Note that the use of this feature makes the parser
noticeably slower.
The data type of `yylloc' has the name `YYLTYPE'.
File: bison.info, Node: Pure Calling, Prev: Token Locations, Up: Lexical
4.6.4 Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
------------------------------------------
When you use the Bison declaration `%define api.pure full' to request a
pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables `yylval' and
`yylloc' cannot be used. (*Note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.)
In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by pointers
passed as arguments to `yylex'. You must declare them as shown here,
and pass the information back by storing it through those pointers.
int
yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
{
...
*lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
...
}
If the grammar file does not use the `@' constructs to refer to
textual locations, then the type `YYLTYPE' will not be defined. In
this case, omit the second argument; `yylex' will be called with only
one argument.
If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to `yylex', use
`%lex-param' just like `%parse-param' (*note Parser Function::).
-- Directive: lex-param {ARGUMENT-DECLARATION}
Declare that the braced-code ARGUMENT-DECLARATION is an additional
`yylex' argument declaration.
For instance:
%lex-param {int *nastiness}
results in the following signature:
int yylex (int *nastiness);
If `%define api.pure full' (or just `%define api.pure') is added:
int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
File: bison.info, Node: Error Reporting, Next: Action Features, Prev: Lexical, Up: Interface
4.7 The Error Reporting Function `yyerror'
==========================================
The Bison parser detects a "syntax error" or "parse error" whenever it
reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An action in the
grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the macro
`YYERROR' (*note Special Features for Use in Actions: Action Features.).
The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
reporting function named `yyerror', which you must supply. It is
called by `yyparse' whenever a syntax error is found, and it receives
one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
`"syntax error"'.
If you invoke the directive `%error-verbose' in the Bison
declarations section (*note The Bison Declarations Section: Bison
Declarations.), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error
message string instead of just plain `"syntax error"'. However, that
message sometimes contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled
(*note LAC::).
The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion.
This can happen when the input contains constructions that are very
deeply nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large
limit. But if memory is exhausted, `yyparse' calls `yyerror' in the
usual fashion, except that the argument string is `"memory exhausted"'.
In some cases diagnostics like `"syntax error"' are translated
automatically from English to some other language before they are
passed to `yyerror'. *Note Internationalization::.
The following definition suffices in simple programs:
void
yyerror (char const *s)
{
fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
}
After `yyerror' returns to `yyparse', the latter will attempt error
recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
(*note Error Recovery::). If recovery is impossible, `yyparse' will
immediately return 1.
Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, `yyerror' should have
an access to the current location. With `%define api.pure', this is
indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
historical reasons, and this is the why `%define api.pure full' should
be prefered over `%define api.pure'.
When `%locations %define api.pure full' is used, `yyerror' has the
following signature:
void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
uses `yyerror'. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
value, so `yyerror' can return any type, including `void'. Also,
`yyerror' can be a variadic function; that is why the message is always
passed last.
Traditionally `yyerror' returns an `int' that is always ignored, but
this is purely for historical reasons, and `void' is preferable since
it more accurately describes the return type for `yyerror'.
The variable `yynerrs' contains the number of syntax errors reported
so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you request a pure
parser (*note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.) then it is a
local variable which only the actions can access.
File: bison.info, Node: Action Features, Next: Internationalization, Prev: Error Reporting, Up: Interface
4.8 Special Features for Use in Actions
=======================================
Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that are
useful in actions.
-- Variable: $$
Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
grouping made by the current rule. *Note Actions::.
-- Variable: $N
Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the Nth
component of the current rule. *Note Actions::.
-- Variable: $<TYPEALT>$
Like `$$' but specifies alternative TYPEALT in the union specified
by the `%union' declaration. *Note Data Types of Values in
Actions: Action Types.
-- Variable: $<TYPEALT>N
Like `$N' but specifies alternative TYPEALT in the union specified
by the `%union' declaration. *Note Data Types of Values in
Actions: Action Types.
-- Macro: YYABORT `;'
Return immediately from `yyparse', indicating failure. *Note The
Parser Function `yyparse': Parser Function.
-- Macro: YYACCEPT `;'
Return immediately from `yyparse', indicating success. *Note The
Parser Function `yyparse': Parser Function.
-- Macro: YYBACKUP (TOKEN, VALUE)`;'
Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token. It is
also disallowed in GLR parsers. It installs a lookahead token
with token type TOKEN and semantic value VALUE; then it discards
the value that was going to be reduced by this rule.
If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is a
lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with a
message `cannot back up' and performs ordinary error recovery.
In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
-- Macro: YYEMPTY
Value stored in `yychar' when there is no lookahead token.
-- Macro: YYEOF
Value stored in `yychar' when the lookahead is the end of the input
stream.
-- Macro: YYERROR `;'
Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error;
however, it does not call `yyerror', and does not print any
message. If you want to print an error message, call `yyerror'
explicitly before the `YYERROR;' statement. *Note Error
Recovery::.
-- Macro: YYRECOVERING
The expression `YYRECOVERING ()' yields 1 when the parser is
recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise. *Note Error
Recovery::.
-- Variable: yychar
Variable containing either the lookahead token, or `YYEOF' when the
lookahead is the end of the input stream, or `YYEMPTY' when no
lookahead has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
Do not modify `yychar' in a deferred semantic action (*note GLR
Semantic Actions::). *Note Lookahead Tokens: Lookahead.
-- Macro: yyclearin `;'
Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
error rules. Do not invoke `yyclearin' in a deferred semantic
action (*note GLR Semantic Actions::). *Note Error Recovery::.
-- Macro: yyerrok `;'
Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
errors. This is useful primarily in error rules. *Note Error
Recovery::.
-- Variable: yylloc
Variable containing the lookahead token location when `yychar' is
not set to `YYEMPTY' or `YYEOF'. Do not modify `yylloc' in a
deferred semantic action (*note GLR Semantic Actions::). *Note
Actions and Locations: Actions and Locations.
-- Variable: yylval
Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when
`yychar' is not set to `YYEMPTY' or `YYEOF'. Do not modify
`yylval' in a deferred semantic action (*note GLR Semantic
Actions::). *Note Actions: Actions.
-- Value: @$
Acts like a structure variable containing information on the
textual location of the grouping made by the current rule. *Note
Tracking Locations::.
-- Value: @N
Acts like a structure variable containing information on the
textual location of the Nth component of the current rule. *Note
Tracking Locations::.
File: bison.info, Node: Internationalization, Prev: Action Features, Up: Interface
4.9 Parser Internationalization
===============================
A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
*Note The User's View: (gettext)Users. For example, the shell command
`export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8' might set the user's locale to French
Canadian using the UTF-8 encoding. The exact set of available locales
depends on the user's installation.
The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser
enables the internationalization of the parser's output through the
following steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
GNU Automake.
1. Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used by the
package --often called `m4'-- copy the `bison-i18n.m4' file
installed by Bison under `share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4' in Bison's
installation directory. For example:
cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
2. In the top-level `configure.ac', after the `AM_GNU_GETTEXT'
invocation, add an invocation of `BISON_I18N'. This macro is
defined in the file `bison-i18n.m4' that you copied earlier. It
causes `configure' to find the value of the `BISON_LOCALEDIR'
variable, and it defines the source-language symbol `YYENABLE_NLS'
to enable translations in the Bison-generated parser.
3. In the `main' function of your program, designate the directory
containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
`bindtextdomain' with domain name `bison-runtime'. For example:
bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
Typically this appears after any other call `bindtextdomain
(PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)' that your package already has. Here we rely
on `BISON_LOCALEDIR' to be defined as a string through the
`Makefile'.
4. In the `Makefile.am' that controls the compilation of the `main'
function, make `BISON_LOCALEDIR' available as a C preprocessor
macro, either in `DEFS' or in `AM_CPPFLAGS'. For example:
DEFS = @DEFS@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
or:
AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5. Finally, invoke the command `autoreconf' to generate the build
infrastructure.
File: bison.info, Node: Algorithm, Next: Error Recovery, Prev: Interface, Up: Top
5 The Bison Parser Algorithm
****************************
As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
semantic values. The stack is called the "parser stack". Pushing a
token is traditionally called "shifting".
For example, suppose the infix calculator has read `1 + 5 *', with a
`3' to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
that was shifted.
But the stack does not always have an element for each token read.
When the last N tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is
called "reduction". Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the
stack by a single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side)
of that rule. Running the rule's action is part of the process of
reduction, because this is what computes the semantic value of the
resulting grouping.
For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
1 + 5 * 3
and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
expr: expr '*' expr;
Then the stack contains just these three elements:
1 + 15
At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single
value 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire
input down to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's
start-symbol (*note Languages and Context-Free Grammars: Language and
Grammar.).
This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
* Menu:
* Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
* Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
* Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
* Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
* Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
* Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
* Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
* Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
* Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
* Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
File: bison.info, Node: Lookahead, Next: Shift/Reduce, Up: Algorithm
5.1 Lookahead Tokens
====================
The Bison parser does _not_ always reduce immediately as soon as the
last N tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
reduction is possible, the parser sometimes "looks ahead" at the next
token in order to decide what to do.
When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it
becomes the "lookahead token", which is not on the stack. Now the
parser can perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on
the stack, while the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no
more reductions should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto
the stack. This does not mean that all possible reductions have been
done; depending on the token type of the lookahead token, some rules
may choose to delay their application.
Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules
define expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix
unary factorial operators (`!'), and allow parentheses for grouping.
expr:
term '+' expr
| term
;
term:
'(' expr ')'
| term '!'
| "number"
;
Suppose that the tokens `1 + 2' have been read and shifted; what
should be done? If the following token is `)', then the first three
tokens must be reduced to form an `expr'. This is the only valid
course, because shifting the `)' would produce a sequence of symbols
`term ')'', and no rule allows this.
If the following token is `!', then it must be shifted immediately so
that `2 !' can be reduced to make a `term'. If instead the parser were
to reduce before shifting, `1 + 2' would become an `expr'. It would
then be impossible to shift the `!' because doing so would produce on
the stack the sequence of symbols `expr '!''. No rule allows that
sequence.
The lookahead token is stored in the variable `yychar'. Its
semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
`yylval' and `yylloc'. *Note Special Features for Use in Actions:
Action Features.
File: bison.info, Node: Shift/Reduce, Next: Precedence, Prev: Lookahead, Up: Algorithm
5.2 Shift/Reduce Conflicts
==========================
Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
statements, with a pair of rules like this:
if_stmt:
"if" expr "then" stmt
| "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
;
Here `"if"', `"then"' and `"else"' are terminal symbols for specific
keyword tokens.
When the `"else"' token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
`"else"', because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
rule.
This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid,
is called a "shift/reduce conflict". Bison is designed to resolve
these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
contrast it with the other alternative.
Since the parser prefers to shift the `"else"', the result is to
attach the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two
inputs equivalent:
if x then if y then win; else lose;
if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift,
the result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost
if-statement, making these two inputs equivalent:
if x then if y then win; else lose;
if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous:
either parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The
established convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by
attaching the else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what
Bison accomplishes by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would
ideally be cleaner to write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very
hard to do in this case.) This particular ambiguity was first
encountered in the specifications of Algol 60 and is called the
"dangling `else'" ambiguity.
To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate
shift/reduce conflicts, you can use the `%expect N' declaration. There
will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts is
exactly N, and Bison will report an error if there is a different
number. *Note Suppressing Conflict Warnings: Expect Decl. However, we
don't recommend the use of `%expect' (except `%expect 0'!), as an equal
number of conflicts does not mean that they are the _same_. When
possible, you should rather use precedence directives to _fix_ the
conflicts explicitly (*note Using Precedence For Non Operators: Non
Operators.).
The definition of `if_stmt' above is solely to blame for the
conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
the conflict:
%%
stmt:
expr
| if_stmt
;
if_stmt:
"if" expr "then" stmt
| "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
;
expr:
"identifier"
;
File: bison.info, Node: Precedence, Next: Contextual Precedence, Prev: Shift/Reduce, Up: Algorithm
5.3 Operator Precedence
=======================
Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
shift and when to reduce.
* Menu:
* Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
* Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
* Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
* How Precedence:: How they work.
* Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
File: bison.info, Node: Why Precedence, Next: Using Precedence, Up: Precedence
5.3.1 When Precedence is Needed
-------------------------------
Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
input `1 - 2 * 3' can be parsed in two different ways):
expr:
expr '-' expr
| expr '*' expr
| expr '<' expr
| '(' expr ')'
...
;
Suppose the parser has seen the tokens `1', `-' and `2'; should it
reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It depends on
the next token. Of course, if the next token is `)', we must reduce;
shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the token
sequence `- 2 )' or anything starting with that. But if the next token
is `*' or `<', we have a choice: either shifting or reduction would
allow the parse to complete, but with different results.
To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results.
If the next operator token OP is shifted, then it must be reduced first
in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference. The
result is (in effect) `1 - (2 OP 3)'. On the other hand, if the
subtraction is reduced before shifting OP, the result is
`(1 - 2) OP 3'. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or reduce should
depend on the relative precedence of the operators `-' and OP: `*'
should be shifted first, but not `<'.
What about input such as `1 - 2 - 5'; should this be `(1 - 2) - 5'
or should it be `1 - (2 - 5)'? For most operators we prefer the
former, which is called "left association". The latter alternative,
"right association", is desirable for assignment operators. The choice
of left or right association is a matter of whether the parser chooses
to shift or reduce when the stack contains `1 - 2' and the lookahead
token is `-': shifting makes right-associativity.
File: bison.info, Node: Using Precedence, Next: Precedence Examples, Prev: Why Precedence, Up: Precedence
5.3.2 Specifying Operator Precedence
------------------------------------
Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
declarations `%left' and `%right'. Each such declaration contains a
list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and associativity
is being declared. The `%left' declaration makes all those operators
left-associative and the `%right' declaration makes them
right-associative. A third alternative is `%nonassoc', which declares
that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice "in a row".
The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
order in which they are declared. The first `%left' or `%right'
declaration in the file declares the operators whose precedence is
lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators whose
precedence is a little higher, and so on.
File: bison.info, Node: Precedence Examples, Next: How Precedence, Prev: Using Precedence, Up: Precedence
5.3.3 Precedence Examples
-------------------------
In our example, we would want the following declarations:
%left '<'
%left '-'
%left '*'
In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well,
we would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example,
`'+'' is declared with `'-'':
%left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
%left '+' '-'
%left '*' '/'
File: bison.info, Node: How Precedence, Next: Non Operators, Prev: Precedence Examples, Up: Precedence
5.3.4 How Precedence Works
--------------------------
The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. *Note Context-Dependent
Precedence: Contextual Precedence.)
Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the
precedence of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead
token. If the token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift.
If the rule's precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they
have equal precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of
that precedence level. The verbose output file made by `-v' (*note
Invoking Bison: Invocation.) says how each conflict was resolved.
Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the
rule or the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to
shift.
File: bison.info, Node: Non Operators, Prev: How Precedence, Up: Precedence
5.3.5 Using Precedence For Non Operators
----------------------------------------
Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators.
For instance, the "dangling `else'" problem (*note Shift/Reduce
Conflicts: Shift/Reduce.) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
In the present case, the conflict is between the token `"else"'
willing to be shifted, and the rule `if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt',
asking for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of
its last token, here `"then"', so the conflict will be solved
appropriately by giving `"else"' a precedence higher than that of
`"then"', for instance as follows:
%nonassoc "then"
%nonassoc "else"
Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in
which case associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve
the shift action, use right associativity:
%right "then" "else"
Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide,
so far, support for "scoped" precedence, both force you to declare the
precedence of these keywords with respect to the other operators your
grammar. Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you
would be unaware of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to `if test then
1 else 2 + 3' being ambiguous: `if test then 1 else (2 + 3)' or `(if
test then 1 else 2) + 3'?), the conflict will be already "fixed".
File: bison.info, Node: Contextual Precedence, Next: Parser States, Prev: Precedence, Up: Algorithm
5.4 Context-Dependent Precedence
================================
Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary
operator.
The Bison precedence declarations, `%left', `%right' and
`%nonassoc', can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the `%prec'
modifier for rules.
The `%prec' modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that
rule. It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the
rule. The modifier's syntax is:
%prec TERMINAL-SYMBOL
and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
assign the rule the precedence of TERMINAL-SYMBOL, overriding the
precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
are resolved (*note Operator Precedence: Precedence.).
Here is how `%prec' solves the problem of unary minus. First,
declare a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named `UMINUS'.
There are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
precedence:
...
%left '+' '-'
%left '*'
%left UMINUS
Now the precedence of `UMINUS' can be used in specific rules:
exp:
...
| exp '-' exp
...
| '-' exp %prec UMINUS
File: bison.info, Node: Parser States, Next: Reduce/Reduce, Prev: Contextual Precedence, Up: Algorithm
5.5 Parser States
=================
The function `yyparse' is implemented using a finite-state machine.
The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes;
they represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols
at or near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the
information about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to
do next.
Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state
together with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table.
This table entry can say, "Shift the lookahead token." In this case,
it also specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of
the parser stack. Or it can say, "Reduce using rule number N." This
means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off the
top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words, that
number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is pushed.
There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead
token is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing
to begin (*note Error Recovery::).
File: bison.info, Node: Reduce/Reduce, Next: Mysterious Conflicts, Prev: Parser States, Up: Algorithm
5.6 Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
===========================
A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that
apply to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious
error in the grammar.
For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence of
zero or more `word' groupings.
sequence:
/* empty */ { printf ("empty sequence\n"); }
| maybeword
| sequence word { printf ("added word %s\n", $2); }
;
maybeword:
/* empty */ { printf ("empty maybeword\n"); }
| word { printf ("single word %s\n", $1); }
;
The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
`word' into a `sequence'. It could be reduced to a `maybeword' and
then into a `sequence' via the second rule. Alternatively,
nothing-at-all could be reduced into a `sequence' via the first rule,
and this could be combined with the `word' using the third rule for
`sequence'.
There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
`sequence'. This can be done directly via the first rule, or
indirectly via `maybeword' and then the second rule.
You might think that this is a distinction without a difference,
because it does not change whether any particular input is valid or
not. But it does affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs
the second rule's action; the other runs the first rule's action and
the third rule's action. In this example, the output of the program
changes.
Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule
that appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on
this. Every reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually
eliminated. Here is the proper way to define `sequence':
sequence:
/* empty */ { printf ("empty sequence\n"); }
| sequence word { printf ("added word %s\n", $2); }
;
Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
sequence:
/* empty */
| sequence words
| sequence redirects
;
words:
/* empty */
| words word
;
redirects:
/* empty */
| redirects redirect
;
The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
`word' or `redirect' groupings. The individual definitions of
`sequence', `words' and `redirects' are error-free, but the three
together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed in
infinitely many ways!
Consider: nothing-at-all could be a `words'. Or it could be two
`words' in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
`redirects', or two, or any number. Or it could be a `words' followed
by three `redirects' and another `words'. And so on.
Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a
single level of sequence:
sequence:
/* empty */
| sequence word
| sequence redirect
;
Second, to prevent either a `words' or a `redirects' from being
empty:
sequence:
/* empty */
| sequence words
| sequence redirects
;
words:
word
| words word
;
redirects:
redirect
| redirects redirect
;
Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
`word word' can be parsed as a single `words' composed of two `word's,
or as two one-`word' `words' (and likewise for `redirect'/`redirects').
However this ambiguity is now a shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it
can now be addressed with precedence directives.
To simplify the matter, we will proceed with `word' and `redirect'
being tokens: `"word"' and `"redirect"'.
To prefer the longest `words', the conflict between the token
`"word"' and the rule `sequence: sequence words' must be resolved as a
shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
*note Using Precedence For Non Operators: Non Operators. One solution
relies on precedences: use `%prec' to give a lower precedence to the
rule:
%nonassoc "word"
%nonassoc "sequence"
%%
sequence:
/* empty */
| sequence word %prec "sequence"
| sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
;
words:
word
| words "word"
;
Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and
the rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
%right "word" "redirect"
%%
sequence:
/* empty */
| sequence word %prec "word"
| sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
;
File: bison.info, Node: Mysterious Conflicts, Next: Tuning LR, Prev: Reduce/Reduce, Up: Algorithm
5.7 Mysterious Conflicts
========================
Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
Here is an example:
%%
def: param_spec return_spec ',';
param_spec:
type
| name_list ':' type
;
return_spec:
type
| name ':' type
;
type: "id";
name: "id";
name_list:
name
| name ',' name_list
;
It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single
token of lookahead: when a `param_spec' is being read, an `"id"' is a
`name' if a comma or colon follows, or a `type' if another `"id"'
follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
LR(1) grammars. In this grammar, two contexts, that after an `"id"' at
the beginning of a `param_spec' and likewise at the beginning of a
`return_spec', are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the same.
They appear similar because the same set of rules would be active--the
rule for reducing to a `name' and that for reducing to a `type'. Bison
is unable to determine at that stage of processing that the rules would
require different lookahead tokens in the two contexts, so it makes a
single parser state for them both. Combining the two contexts causes a
conflict later. In parser terminology, this occurrence means that the
grammar is not LALR(1).
For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the
non-LR(1) class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties
beyond just mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix
all these problems is to select a different parser table construction
algorithm. Either IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the
former is more efficient and easier to debug during development. *Note
LR Table Construction::, for details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical
LR(1) implementations are experimental. More user feedback will help
to stabilize them.)
If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you can
often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to `return_spec' as
follows makes the problem go away:
...
return_spec:
type
| name ':' type
| "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
;
This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
additional active rule in the context after the `"id"' at the beginning
of `return_spec'. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
in a `param_spec', so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
As long as the token `"bogus"' is never generated by `yylex', the added
rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
In this particular example, there is another way to solve the
problem: rewrite the rule for `return_spec' to use `"id"' directly
instead of via `name'. This also causes the two confusing contexts to
have different sets of active rules, because the one for `return_spec'
activates the altered rule for `return_spec' rather than the one for
`name'.
param_spec:
type
| name_list ':' type
;
return_spec:
type
| "id" ':' type
;
For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
generators, *note DeRemer 1982: Bibliography.
File: bison.info, Node: Tuning LR, Next: Generalized LR Parsing, Prev: Mysterious Conflicts, Up: Algorithm
5.8 Tuning LR
=============
The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For
example, in the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts
that can be produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table
construction algorithm. Another example is Bison's `%error-verbose'
directive, which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose
syntax error messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect
information.
In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that
allow you to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based
parsers. Some of these features easily eliminate shortcomings like
those mentioned above. Others can be helpful purely for understanding
your parser.
Most of the features discussed in this section are still
experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.
* Menu:
* LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
* Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
* LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
* Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
File: bison.info, Node: LR Table Construction, Next: Default Reductions, Up: Tuning LR
5.8.1 LR Table Construction
---------------------------
For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by
default. However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition
power of LR. As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR
parser tables is often mysterious. We presented a simple example of
this effect in *note Mysterious Conflicts::.
As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
difficult as well.
Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility
of such mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a
more powerful parser table construction algorithm by using the `%define
lr.type' directive.
-- Directive: %define lr.type TYPE
Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The
accepted values for TYPE are:
* `lalr' (default)
* `ielr'
* `canonical-lr'
(This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to
stabilize it.)
For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive
to you grammar file:
%define lr.type ielr
For the example in *note Mysterious Conflicts::, the mysterious
conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic
parsing algorithm) is sufficient to support the full
language-recognition power of LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start
of grammar development, you can safely and completely eliminate the
need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances
where LALR or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth (*note
Knuth 1965: Bibliography.) can be useful. Here we summarize the
relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
Bison:
* LALR
There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
* GLR without static conflict resolution.
When employing GLR parsers (*note GLR Parsers::), if you do
not resolve any conflicts statically (for example, with
`%left' or `%prec'), then the parser explores all potential
parses of any given input. In this case, the choice of
parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are
the smallest parser tables Bison can currently construct, so
they may then be preferable. Nevertheless, once you begin to
resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves more like a
deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then
be helpful to avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
* Malformed grammars.
Occasionally during development, an especially malformed
grammar with a major recurring flaw may severely impede the
IELR or canonical LR parser table construction algorithm.
LALR can be a quick way to construct parser tables in order
to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
differences from IELR and canonical LR.
* IELR
IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That
is, given any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or
canonical LR parser tables always accept exactly the same set of
sentences. However, like LALR, IELR merges parser states during
parser table construction so that the number of parser states is
often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR. More
importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of
conflicts for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well.
This effect can significantly reduce the complexity of developing
a grammar.
* Canonical LR
While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an
interesting means to explore a grammar because they possess a
property that IELR and LALR tables do not. That is, if
`%nonassoc' is not used and default reductions are left disabled
(*note Default Reductions::), then, for every left context of
every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state
is guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically
acceptable in that left context. It might then seem that an
advantage of canonical LR parsers in production is that, under the
above constraints, they are guaranteed to detect a syntax error as
soon as possible without performing any unnecessary reductions.
However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also able to achieve this
behavior without sacrificing `%nonassoc' or default reductions.
For details and a few caveats of LAC, *note LAC::.
For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR
parsers and the benefits of IELR, *note Denny 2008 March: Bibliography,
and *note Denny 2010 November: Bibliography.
File: bison.info, Node: Default Reductions, Next: LAC, Prev: LR Table Construction, Up: Tuning LR
5.8.2 Default Reductions
------------------------
After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead
set and to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such
a reduction is known as a "default reduction".
Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables.
They also affect the behavior of the parser:
* Delayed `yylex' invocations.
A "consistent state" is a state that has only one possible parser
action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
reduction, then that consistent state is called a "defaulted
state". Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser
does not bother to invoke `yylex' to fetch the next token before
performing the reduction. In other words, whether default
reductions are enabled in consistent states determines how soon a
Bison-generated parser invokes `yylex' for a token: immediately
when it _reaches_ that token in the input or when it eventually
_needs_ that token as a lookahead to determine the next parser
action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
parser exhibits the latter behavior.
The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
designing `yylex' and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior
of `yylex' can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay
of the next `yylex' invocation until after those reductions is
significant. For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope
stack that `yylex' uses to determine what token to return. Thus,
the delay might be necessary to ensure that `yylex' does not look
up the next token in a scope that should already be considered
closed.
* Delayed syntax error detection.
When the parser fetches a new token by invoking `yylex', it checks
whether there is an action for that token in the current parser
state. The parser detects a syntax error if and only if either
(1) there is no action for that token or (2) the action for that
token is the error action (due to the use of `%nonassoc').
However, if there is a default reduction in that state (which
might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is impossible
for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until
it reaches a later state.
While default reductions never cause the parser to accept
syntactically incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error
detection can have unexpected effects on the behavior of the
parser. However, the delay can be caused anyway by parser state
merging and the use of `%nonassoc', and it can be fixed by another
Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed syntax
error detection and LAC more in the next section (*note LAC::).
For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by
default is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting
state, which has no other action and is thus a defaulted state.
However, the default accept action does not delay any `yylex'
invocation or syntax error detection because the accept action ends the
parse.
For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all
states by default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that
have a shift action on the `error' token do not have default reductions
because delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the `error'
token from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state
merging can cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both
cases, so future versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC
is activated. Second, GLR parsers do not record the default reduction
as the action on a lookahead token for which there is a conflict. The
correct action in this case is to split the parse instead.
To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
`%define lr.default-reductions' directive.
-- Directive: %define lr.default-reductions WHERE
Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default
reductions. The accepted values of WHERE are:
* `most' (default for LALR and IELR)
* `consistent'
* `accepting' (default for canonical LR)
(The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
File: bison.info, Node: LAC, Next: Unreachable States, Prev: Default Reductions, Up: Tuning LR
5.8.3 LAC
---------
Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to
begin in a different syntactic context than the one in which the
invalid token was encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are
enabled (*note Error Reporting::), the expected token list in the
syntax error message can both contain invalid tokens and omit valid
tokens.
The culprits for the above problems are `%nonassoc', default
reductions in inconsistent states (*note Default Reductions::), and
parser state merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they
suffer the most. Canonical LR can suffer only if `%nonassoc' is used
or if default reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing
algorithm that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR
without sacrificing `%nonassoc', default reductions, or state merging.
You can enable LAC with the `%define parse.lac' directive.
-- Directive: %define parse.lac VALUE
Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
* `none' (default)
* `full'
(This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to
stabilize it. Moreover, it is currently only available for
deterministic parsers in C.)
Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the
parser fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine
the next parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and
performs an exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal
parser state stack. During this exploratory parse, the parser does not
perform user semantic actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a
shift action, normal parsing then resumes on the normal parser stacks.
If the exploratory parse reaches an error instead, the parser reports a
syntax error. If verbose syntax error messages are enabled, the parser
must then discover the list of expected tokens, so it performs a
separate exploratory parse for each token in the grammar.
There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a
consistent parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not
attempt to fetch a token from the scanner because no lookahead is
needed to determine the next parser action. Thus, whether default
reductions are enabled in consistent states (*note Default
Reductions::) affects how soon the parser detects a syntax error:
immediately when it _reaches_ an erroneous token or when it eventually
_needs_ that token as a lookahead to determine the next parser action.
The latter behavior is probably more intuitive, so Bison currently
provides no way to achieve the former behavior while default reductions
are enabled in consistent states.
Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to
enable default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR
behave almost exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and
syntactically unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support
the full language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at
least enables LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
language-recognition power.
There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
* Infinite parsing loops.
IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR.
Some parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not
fix infinite parsing loops that occur between encountering a
syntax error and detecting it, but enabling canonical LR or
disabling default reductions sometimes does.
* Verbose error message limitations.
Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated
parsers limit the size of the expected token list they are willing
to report in a verbose syntax error message. If the number of
expected tokens exceeds that limit, the list is simply dropped
from the message. Enabling LAC can increase the size of the list
and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of course, dropping the
list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
* Performance.
Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it
can have a performance penalty. However, not all parse actions
must be performed twice. Specifically, during a series of default
reductions in consistent states and shift actions, the parser
never has to initiate an exploratory parse. Moreover, the most
time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the file I/O, the
lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's semantic
actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an
exploratory parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack
so that the stack is never physically copied. In our experience,
the performance penalty of LAC has proved insignificant for
practical grammars.
While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized
in the parser community for years, for the publication that introduces
LAC, *note Denny 2010 May: Bibliography.
File: bison.info, Node: Unreachable States, Prev: LAC, Up: Tuning LR
5.8.4 Unreachable States
------------------------
If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start
state to some state S, then Bison considers S to be an "unreachable
state". A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if
Bison disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after
conflict resolution because they are useless in the generated parser.
However, keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to
understand the relationship between the parser and the grammar.
-- Directive: %define lr.keep-unreachable-states VALUE
Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the
parser tables. VALUE must be a Boolean. The default is `false'.
There are a few caveats to consider:
* Missing or extraneous warnings.
Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not
used in any other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may
induce warnings that are irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and
it may eliminate warnings that are relevant. Of course, the
change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior
will likely remain in future Bison releases.
* Other useless states.
While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not
guaranteed to remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically,
when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional
states may become useless. If Bison were to compute which goto
actions were useless and then disable those actions, it could
identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
File: bison.info, Node: Generalized LR Parsing, Next: Memory Management, Prev: Tuning LR, Up: Algorithm
5.9 Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
================================
Bison produces _deterministic_ parsers that choose uniquely when to
reduce and which reduction to apply based on a summary of the preceding
input and on one extra token of lookahead. As a result, normal Bison
handles a proper subset of the family of context-free languages.
Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
Finally, as previously mentioned (*note Mysterious Conflicts::), there
are languages where Bison's default choice of how to summarize the
input seen so far loses necessary information.
When you use the `%glr-parser' declaration in your grammar file,
Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR parser uses the same basic
algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
been resolved by precedence rules (*note Precedence::) or a
reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a situation,
it effectively _splits_ into a several parsers, one for each possible
shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent when
they both represent the same sequence of states, and each pair of
corresponding states represents a grammar symbol that produces the same
segment of the input token stream.
Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple states
to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions. At this
transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic values
that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The parser
tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule has
the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the `%dprec' declaration.
Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by precedence,
but there the same merging function is declared for both rules by the
`%merge' declaration, Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls
the merge function on the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the size
of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily LR(1)) grammar in
quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local--the parser is "in doubt"
only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data structure
should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a grammar, in
particular, it is only slightly slower than with the deterministic
LR(1) Bison parser.
For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, *note Scott 2000:
Bibliography.
File: bison.info, Node: Memory Management, Prev: Generalized LR Parsing, Up: Algorithm
5.10 Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
==========================================================
The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are
shifted and not reduced. When this happens, the parser function
`yyparse' calls `yyerror' and then returns 2.
Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
recursion, see *note Recursive Rules: Recursion.
By defining the macro `YYMAXDEPTH', you can control how deep the
parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the macro
with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number of
tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you
specify a large value for `YYMAXDEPTH', the parser normally allocates a
small stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed.
This increasing allocation happens automatically and silently.
Therefore, you do not need to make `YYMAXDEPTH' painfully small merely
to save space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
However, do not allow `YYMAXDEPTH' to be a value so large that
arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
space. Also, do not allow `YYMAXDEPTH' to be less than `YYINITDEPTH'.
The default value of `YYMAXDEPTH', if you do not define it, is 10000.
You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
macro `YYINITDEPTH' to a positive integer. For the deterministic
parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant unless you are
assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler that allows
variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
Do not allow `YYINITDEPTH' to be greater than `YYMAXDEPTH'.
Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled by C++
compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
suggested to grow `YYINITDEPTH'. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
this deficiency in a future release.
File: bison.info, Node: Error Recovery, Next: Context Dependency, Prev: Algorithm, Up: Top
6 Error Recovery
****************
It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should
accept another expression.
In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line,
it may be sufficient to allow `yyparse' to return 1 on error and have
the caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and
then call `yyparse' again). But this is inadequate for a compiler,
because it forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error.
A syntax error deep within a function in the compiler input should not
cause the compiler to treat the following line like the beginning of a
source file.
You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
recognize the special token `error'. This is a terminal symbol that is
always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
handling. The Bison parser generates an `error' token whenever a
syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this
token in the current context, the parse can continue.
For example:
stmts:
/* empty string */
| stmts '\n'
| stmts exp '\n'
| stmts error '\n'
The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a
newline makes a valid addition to any `stmts'.
What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an `exp'? The
error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise
sequence of a `stmts', an `error' and a newline. If an error occurs in
the middle of an `exp', there will probably be some additional tokens
and subexpressions on the stack after the last `stmts', and there will
be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
applicable in the ordinary way.
But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding
part of the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards
states and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in
which the `error' token is acceptable. (This means that the
subexpressions already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete
`stmts'.) At this point the `error' token can be shifted. Then, if
the old lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the
parser reads tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is
acceptable. In this example, Bison reads and discards input until the
next newline so that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded
symbols are possible sources of memory leaks, see *note Freeing
Discarded Symbols: Destructor Decl, for a means to reclaim this memory.
The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies
for error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the
rest of the current input line or current statement if an error is
detected:
stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate
another, spurious error message:
primary:
'(' expr ')'
| '(' error ')'
...
;
Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess
wrong, one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example,
the error recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input
within one `stmt'. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is
inserted in the middle of a valid `stmt'. After the error recovery
rule recovers from the first error, another syntax error will be found
straightaway, since the text following the spurious semicolon is also
an invalid `stmt'.
To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output
no error message for another syntax error that happens shortly after
the first; only after three consecutive input tokens have been
successfully shifted will error messages resume.
Note that rules which accept the `error' token may have actions, just
as any other rules can.
You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
`yyerrok' in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
`yyerrok;' is a valid C statement.
The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an
error. If this is unacceptable, then the macro `yyclearin' may be used
to clear this token. Write the statement `yyclearin;' in the error
rule's action. *Note Special Features for Use in Actions: Action
Features.
For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling
routine is called that advances the input stream to some point where
parsing should once again commence. The next symbol returned by the
lexical scanner is probably correct. The previous lookahead token
ought to be discarded with `yyclearin;'.
The expression `YYRECOVERING ()' yields 1 when the parser is
recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise. Syntax error
diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax error.
File: bison.info, Node: Context Dependency, Next: Debugging, Prev: Error Recovery, Up: Top
7 Handling Context Dependencies
*******************************
The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected
by its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain
techniques (known as "kludges") may enable you to write Bison parsers
for such languages.
* Menu:
* Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
* Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
* Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
error recovery rules must be written.
(Actually, "kludge" means any technique that gets its job done but is
neither clean nor robust.)
File: bison.info, Node: Semantic Tokens, Next: Lexical Tie-ins, Up: Context Dependency
7.1 Semantic Info in Token Types
================================
The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
foo (x);
This looks like a function call statement, but if `foo' is a typedef
name, then this is actually a declaration of `x'. How can a Bison
parser for C decide how to parse this input?
The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
`IDENTIFIER' and `TYPENAME'. When `yylex' finds an identifier, it
looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order to decide
which token type to return: `TYPENAME' if the identifier is declared as
a typedef, `IDENTIFIER' otherwise.
The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the
choice of token type to recognize. `IDENTIFIER' is accepted as an
expression, but `TYPENAME' is not. `TYPENAME' can start a declaration,
but `IDENTIFIER' cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the
identifier is _not_ significant, such as in declarations that can
shadow a typedef name, either `TYPENAME' or `IDENTIFIER' is
accepted--there is one rule for each of the two token types.
This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
earlier:
typedef int foo, bar;
int baz (void)
{
static bar (bar); /* redeclare `bar' as static variable */
extern foo foo (foo); /* redeclare `foo' as function */
return foo (bar);
}
Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the
declaration construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure--the
"declarator".
As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated,
with all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration
in which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
initdcl:
declarator maybeasm '=' init
| declarator maybeasm
;
notype_initdcl:
notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
| notype_declarator maybeasm
;
Here `initdcl' can redeclare a typedef name, but `notype_initdcl'
cannot. The distinction between `declarator' and `notype_declarator'
is the same sort of thing.
There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
(described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis
is changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The
difference is here the information is global, and is used for other
purposes in the program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose
flag controlled by the syntactic context.
File: bison.info, Node: Lexical Tie-ins, Next: Tie-in Recovery, Prev: Semantic Tokens, Up: Context Dependency
7.2 Lexical Tie-ins
===================
One way to handle context-dependency is the "lexical tie-in": a flag
which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens
are parsed.
For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a
special construct `hex (HEX-EXPR)'. After the keyword `hex' comes an
expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
particular, the token `a1b' must be treated as an integer rather than
as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do
it:
%{
int hexflag;
int yylex (void);
void yyerror (char const *);
%}
%%
...
expr:
IDENTIFIER
| constant
| HEX '(' { hexflag = 1; }
expr ')' { hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; }
| expr '+' expr { $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); }
...
;
constant:
INTEGER
| STRING
;
Here we assume that `yylex' looks at the value of `hexflag'; when it is
nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
The declaration of `hexflag' shown in the prologue of the grammar
file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (*note The
Prologue: Prologue.). You must also write the code in `yylex' to obey
the flag.
File: bison.info, Node: Tie-in Recovery, Prev: Lexical Tie-ins, Up: Context Dependency
7.3 Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
======================================
Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you
have. *Note Error Recovery::.
The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is
to abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger
construct. For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery
rule is to skip tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new
statement, like this:
stmt:
expr ';'
| IF '(' expr ')' stmt { ... }
...
| error ';' { hexflag = 0; }
;
If there is a syntax error in the middle of a `hex (EXPR)'
construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
completed `hex (EXPR)' will never run. So `hexflag' would remain set
for the entire rest of the input, or until the next `hex' keyword,
causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears
`hexflag'.
There may also be an error recovery rule that works within
expressions. For example, there could be a rule which applies within
parentheses and skips to the close-parenthesis:
expr:
...
| '(' expr ')' { $$ = $2; }
| '(' error ')'
...
If this rule acts within the `hex' construct, it is not going to
abort that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses
within the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the
rest of the `hex' construct should be parsed with the flag still in
effect.
What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
`hex' construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
way you can write the action to determine whether a `hex' construct is
being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had
better make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each
rule must be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always
won't, have to clear the flag.
File: bison.info, Node: Debugging, Next: Invocation, Prev: Context Dependency, Up: Top
8 Debugging Your Parser
***********************
Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
understand the algorithm (*note The Bison Parser Algorithm:
Algorithm.). This chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its
structure. They explain how to generate and read the detailed
description of the automaton. There are several formats available:
- as text, see *note Understanding Your Parser: Understanding.;
- as a graph, see *note Visualizing Your Parser: Graphviz.;
- or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML,
see *note Visualizing your parser in multiple formats: Xml.
The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to
enable and understand the parser run-time traces (*note Tracing Your
Parser: Tracing.).
* Menu:
* Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
* Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
* Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
* Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
File: bison.info, Node: Understanding, Next: Graphviz, Up: Debugging
8.1 Understanding Your Parser
=============================
As documented elsewhere (*note The Bison Parser Algorithm: Algorithm.)
Bison parsers are "shift/reduce automata". In some cases (much more
frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
tune or simply fix a parser.
The textual file is generated when the options `--report' or
`--verbose' are specified, see *note Invoking Bison: Invocation. Its
name is made by removing `.tab.c' or `.c' from the parser
implementation file name, and adding `.output' instead. Therefore, if
the grammar file is `foo.y', then the parser implementation file is
called `foo.tab.c' by default. As a consequence, the verbose output
file is called `foo.output'.
The following grammar file, `calc.y', will be used in the sequel:
%token NUM STR
%left '+' '-'
%left '*'
%%
exp:
exp '+' exp
| exp '-' exp
| exp '*' exp
| exp '/' exp
| NUM
;
useless: STR;
%%
`bison' reports:
calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
When given `--report=state', in addition to `calc.tab.c', it creates
a file `calc.output' with contents detailed below. The order of the
output and the exact presentation might vary, but the interpretation is
the same.
The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules.
Useless nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a
smaller parser, but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be
used by the scanner (note the difference between "useless" and "unused"
below):
Nonterminals useless in grammar
useless
Terminals unused in grammar
STR
Rules useless in grammar
6 useless: STR
The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
Grammar
0 $accept: exp $end
1 exp: exp '+' exp
2 | exp '-' exp
3 | exp '*' exp
4 | exp '/' exp
5 | NUM
and reports the uses of the symbols:
Terminals, with rules where they appear
$end (0) 0
'*' (42) 3
'+' (43) 1
'-' (45) 2
'/' (47) 4
error (256)
NUM (258) 5
STR (259)
Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
$accept (9)
on left: 0
exp (10)
on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
with its set of "items", also known as "pointed rules". Each item is a
production rule together with a point (`.') marking the location of the
input cursor.
State 0
0 $accept: . exp $end
NUM shift, and go to state 1
exp go to state 2
This reads as follows: "state 0 corresponds to being at the very
beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
symbol (here, `exp'). When the parser returns to this state right
after having reduced a rule that produced an `exp', the control flow
jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
symbol, and the lookahead is a `NUM', then this token is shifted onto
the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
lookahead triggers a syntax error."
Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
report lists `NUM' as a lookahead token because `NUM' can be at the
beginning of any rule deriving an `exp'. By default Bison reports the
so-called "core" or "kernel" of the item set, but if you want to see
more detail you can invoke `bison' with `--report=itemset' to list the
derived items as well:
State 0
0 $accept: . exp $end
1 exp: . exp '+' exp
2 | . exp '-' exp
3 | . exp '*' exp
4 | . exp '/' exp
5 | . NUM
NUM shift, and go to state 1
exp go to state 2
In the state 1...
State 1
5 exp: NUM .
$default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
the rule 5, `exp: NUM;', is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
(`$default'), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from State
0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will jump
to state 2 (`exp: go to state 2').
State 2
0 $accept: exp . $end
1 exp: exp . '+' exp
2 | exp . '-' exp
3 | exp . '*' exp
4 | exp . '/' exp
$end shift, and go to state 3
'+' shift, and go to state 4
'-' shift, and go to state 5
'*' shift, and go to state 6
'/' shift, and go to state 7
In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
because of the item `exp: exp . '+' exp', if the lookahead is `+' it is
shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton jumps to state 4,
corresponding to the item `exp: exp '+' . exp'. Since there is no
default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax error.
The state 3 is named the "final state", or the "accepting state":
State 3
0 $accept: exp $end .
$default accept
the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input
were read), the parsing exits successfully.
The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left
to the reader.
State 4
1 exp: exp '+' . exp
NUM shift, and go to state 1
exp go to state 8
State 5
2 exp: exp '-' . exp
NUM shift, and go to state 1
exp go to state 9
State 6
3 exp: exp '*' . exp
NUM shift, and go to state 1
exp go to state 10
State 7
4 exp: exp '/' . exp
NUM shift, and go to state 1
exp go to state 11
As was announced in beginning of the report, `State 8 conflicts: 1
shift/reduce':
State 8
1 exp: exp . '+' exp
1 | exp '+' exp .
2 | exp . '-' exp
3 | exp . '*' exp
4 | exp . '/' exp
'*' shift, and go to state 6
'/' shift, and go to state 7
'/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
$default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead `/':
either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of `/', the
sentence `NUM + NUM / NUM' can be parsed as `NUM + (NUM / NUM)', which
corresponds to shifting `/', or as `(NUM + NUM) / NUM', which
corresponds to reducing rule 1.
Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see *note Shift/Reduce
Conflicts: Shift/Reduce. Discarded actions are reported between square
brackets.
Note that all the previous states had a single possible action:
either shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting _and_
reducing is possible or when _several_ reductions are possible, the
lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is one such state:
if the lookahead is `*' or `/' then the action is shifting, otherwise
the action is reducing rule 1. In other words, the first two items,
corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the lookahead token is
`*', since we specified that `*' has higher precedence than `+'. More
generally, some items are eligible only with some set of possible
lookahead tokens. When run with `--report=lookahead', Bison specifies
these lookahead tokens:
State 8
1 exp: exp . '+' exp
1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
2 | exp . '-' exp
3 | exp . '*' exp
4 | exp . '/' exp
'*' shift, and go to state 6
'/' shift, and go to state 7
'/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
$default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
Note however that while `NUM + NUM / NUM' is ambiguous (which
results in the conflicts on `/'), `NUM + NUM * NUM' is not: the
conflict was solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives.
If invoked with `--report=solved', Bison includes information about the
solved conflicts in the report:
Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
The remaining states are similar:
State 9
1 exp: exp . '+' exp
2 | exp . '-' exp
2 | exp '-' exp .
3 | exp . '*' exp
4 | exp . '/' exp
'*' shift, and go to state 6
'/' shift, and go to state 7
'/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
$default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
State 10
1 exp: exp . '+' exp
2 | exp . '-' exp
3 | exp . '*' exp
3 | exp '*' exp .
4 | exp . '/' exp
'/' shift, and go to state 7
'/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
$default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
State 11
1 exp: exp . '+' exp
2 | exp . '-' exp
3 | exp . '*' exp
4 | exp . '/' exp
4 | exp '/' exp .
'+' shift, and go to state 4
'-' shift, and go to state 5
'*' shift, and go to state 6
'/' shift, and go to state 7
'+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
'-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
'*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
'/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
$default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
precedence of `/' with respect to `+', `-', and `*', but also because
the associativity of `/' is not specified.
Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML
file and XSLT processing (*note Visualizing your parser in multiple
formats: Xml.).
File: bison.info, Node: Graphviz, Next: Xml, Prev: Understanding, Up: Debugging
8.2 Visualizing Your Parser
===========================
As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be
generated. Note that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at
best, and impractical most of the times, because the generated files
are huge (the generation of a PDF or PNG file from it will take very
long, and more often than not it will fail due to memory exhaustion).
This option was rather designed for beginners, to help them understand
LR parsers.
This file is generated when the `--graph' option is specified (*note
Invoking Bison: Invocation.). Its name is made by removing `.tab.c' or
`.c' from the parser implementation file name, and adding `.dot'
instead. If the grammar file is `foo.y', the Graphviz output file is
called `foo.dot'. A DOT file may also be produced via an XML file and
XSLT processing (*note Visualizing your parser in multiple formats:
Xml.).
The following grammar file, `rr.y', will be used in the sequel:
%%
exp: a ";" | b ".";
a: "0";
b: "0";
The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such
it is easier understood by making direct comparisons between them.
*Note Debugging Your Parser: Debugging, for a detailled analysis of the
textual report.
Graphical Representation of States
----------------------------------
The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph
nodes. Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the
following points, about transitions, for examples
When invoked with `--report=lookaheads', the lookahead tokens, when
needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the
representation of reductions, below.
The transitions are represented as directed edges between the
current and the target states.
Graphical Representation of Shifts
----------------------------------
Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for
that shift. The following describes a reduction in the `rr.output' file:
State 3
1 exp: a . ";"
";" shift, and go to state 6
A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
[image src="figs/example-shift.png" text=".----------------.
| State 3 |
| 1 exp: a . \";\" |
`----------------'
|
| \";\"
|
v
.----------------.
| State 6 |
| 1 exp: a \";\" . |
`----------------'
" ]
Graphical Representation of Reductions
--------------------------------------
Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the
default action for the given state, there is no such label.
This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file
`rr.output':
State 1
3 a: "0" . [";"]
4 b: "0" . ["."]
"." reduce using rule 4 (b)
$default reduce using rule 3 (a)
A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
[image src="figs/example-reduce.png" text=" .------------------.
| State 1 |
| 3 a: \"0\" . [\";\"] |
| 4 b: \"0\" . [\".\"] |
`------------------'
/ \\
/ \\ [\".\"]
/ \\
v v
/ \\ / \\
/ R \\ / R \\
(green) \\ 3 / \\ 4 / (green)
\\ / \\ /
" ]
When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
reduction, see *note Shift/Reduce Conflicts: Shift/Reduce. Discarded
actions are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just
like how they are reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
Graphical representation of go tos
----------------------------------
The `go to' jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
the name of the rule being jumped to.
File: bison.info, Node: Xml, Next: Tracing, Prev: Graphviz, Up: Debugging
8.3 Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
===============================================
Bison supports two major report formats: textual output (*note
Understanding Your Parser: Understanding.) when invoked with option
`--verbose', and DOT (*note Visualizing Your Parser: Graphviz.) when
invoked with option `--graph'. However, another alternative is to
output an XML file that may then be, with `xsltproc', rendered as
either a raw text format equivalent to the verbose file, or as an HTML
version of the same file, with clickable transitions, or even as a DOT.
The `.output' and DOT files obtained via XSLT have no difference
whatsoever with those obtained by invoking `bison' with options
`--verbose' or `--graph'.
The XML file is generated when the options `-x' or `--xml[=FILE]'
are specified, see *note Invoking Bison: Invocation. If not specified,
its name is made by removing `.tab.c' or `.c' from the parser
implementation file name, and adding `.xml' instead. For instance, if
the grammar file is `foo.y', the default XML output file is `foo.xml'.
Bison ships with a `data/xslt' directory, containing XSL
Transformation files to apply to the XML file. Their names are
non-ambiguous:
`xml2dot.xsl'
Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
`xml2text.xsl'
Used to output a copy of the `.output' file.
`xml2xhtml.xsl'
Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the `.output' file.
Sample usage (requires `xsltproc'):
$ bison -x gr.y
$ bison --print-datadir
/usr/local/share/bison
$ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
File: bison.info, Node: Tracing, Prev: Xml, Up: Debugging
8.4 Tracing Your Parser
=======================
When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses "incorrectly", the
`yydebug' parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
* Menu:
* Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
* Mfcalc Traces:: Extending `mfcalc' to support traces
* The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
File: bison.info, Node: Enabling Traces, Next: Mfcalc Traces, Up: Tracing
8.4.1 Enabling Traces
---------------------
There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
the macro `YYDEBUG'
Define the macro `YYDEBUG' to a nonzero value when you compile the
parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
`-DYYDEBUG=1' as a compiler option or you could put `#define
YYDEBUG 1' in the prologue of the grammar file (*note The
Prologue: Prologue.).
If the `%define' variable `api.prefix' is used (*note Multiple
Parsers in the Same Program: Multiple Parsers.), for instance
`%define api.prefix x', then if `CDEBUG' is defined, its value
controls the tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero);
otherwise tracing is enabled if and only if `YYDEBUG' is nonzero.
the option `-t' (POSIX Yacc compliant)
the option `--debug' (Bison extension)
Use the `-t' option when you run Bison (*note Invoking Bison:
Invocation.). With `%define api.prefix c', it defines `CDEBUG' to
1, otherwise it defines `YYDEBUG' to 1.
the directive `%debug'
Add the `%debug' directive (*note Bison Declaration Summary: Decl
Summary.). This is a Bison extension, especially useful for
languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging
is always possible.
The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
`YYFPRINTF (stderr, FORMAT, ARGS)' where FORMAT and ARGS are the usual
`printf' format and variadic arguments. If you define `YYDEBUG' to a
nonzero value but do not define `YYFPRINTF', `<stdio.h>' is
automatically included and `YYFPRINTF' is defined to `fprintf'.
Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable `yydebug'.
You can do this by making the C code do it (in `main', perhaps), or you
can alter the value with a C debugger.
Each step taken by the parser when `yydebug' is nonzero produces a
line or two of trace information, written on `stderr'. The trace
messages tell you these things:
* Each time the parser calls `yylex', what kind of token was read.
* Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of
the state stack (*note Parser States::).
* Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete
contents of the state stack afterward.
To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
description file (*note Understanding Your Parser: Understanding.).
This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of positions in
various rules, and also what each state will do with each possible
input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you can see
that the parser is functioning according to its specification in the
listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where something
undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the grammar are to
blame.
The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can
use debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing.
The parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside
from the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the
values of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
File: bison.info, Node: Mfcalc Traces, Next: The YYPRINT Macro, Prev: Enabling Traces, Up: Tracing
8.4.2 Enabling Debug Traces for `mfcalc'
----------------------------------------
The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
read, but not its semantic value. The `%printer' directive allows
specify how semantic values are reported, see *note Printing Semantic
Values: Printer Decl. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers
may also use the `YYPRINT' (*note The `YYPRINT' Macro: The YYPRINT
Macro.), but its use is discouraged.
As a demonstration of `%printer', consider the multi-function
calculator, `mfcalc' (*note Multi-function Calc::). To enable run-time
traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in
its prologue:
/* Generate the parser description file. */
%verbose
/* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
%define parse.trace
/* Formatting semantic values. */
%printer { fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); } VAR;
%printer { fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); } FNCT;
%printer { fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); } <val>;
The `%define' directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by
the `yydebug' variable, which is disabled by default. Because these
traces will refer to the "states" of the parser, it is helpful to ask
for the creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose
of (admittedly ill-named) `%verbose' directive.
The set of `%printer' directives demonstrates how to format the
semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
either on the symbol type (e.g., `VAR' or `FNCT'), or on the type tag:
since `<val>' is the type for both `NUM' and `exp', this printer will
be used for them.
Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces.
The traces are sent onto standard error.
$ echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p
Starting parse
Entering state 0
Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
-> $$ = nterm input ()
Stack now 0
Entering state 1
This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first
rule (which is in line 34 of `mfcalc.y' can be reduced without even
having to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol
(`$$') is a valueless (`()') `input' non terminal (`nterm').
Then the parser calls the scanner.
Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
Shifting token FNCT (sin())
Entering state 6
That token (`token') is a function (`FNCT') whose value is `sin' as
formatted per our `%printer' specification: `sin()'. The parser stores
(`Shifting') that token, and others, until it can do something about it.
Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
Shifting token '(' ()
Entering state 14
Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
Entering state 4
Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
$1 = token NUM (1.000000)
-> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
Stack now 0 1 6 14
Entering state 24
The previous reduction demonstrates the `%printer' directive for
`<val>': both the token `NUM' and the resulting nonterminal `exp' have
`1' as value.
Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
Shifting token '-' ()
Entering state 17
Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
Entering state 4
Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
$1 = token NUM (1.000000)
-> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
Entering state 26
Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
$1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
$2 = token '-' ()
$3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
-> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
Stack now 0 1 6 14
Entering state 24
The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
discover the end of the call to `sin'.
Next token is token ')' ()
Shifting token ')' ()
Entering state 31
Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
$1 = token FNCT (sin())
$2 = token '(' ()
$3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
$4 = token ')' ()
-> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
Stack now 0 1
Entering state 11
Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation,
and display its result.
Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
Shifting token '\n' ()
Entering state 22
Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
$1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
$2 = token '\n' ()
=> 0
-> $$ = nterm line ()
Stack now 0 1
Entering state 10
Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
$1 = nterm input ()
$2 = nterm line ()
-> $$ = nterm input ()
Stack now 0
Entering state 1
The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the
next expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes
the completion of the parsing.
Reading a token: Now at end of input.
Shifting token $end ()
Entering state 2
Stack now 0 1 2
Cleanup: popping token $end ()
Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
File: bison.info, Node: The YYPRINT Macro, Prev: Mfcalc Traces, Up: Tracing
8.4.3 The `YYPRINT' Macro
-------------------------
Before `%printer' support, semantic values could be displayed using the
`YYPRINT' macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
the `yacc.c' skeleton.
-- Macro: YYPRINT (STREAM, TOKEN, VALUE);
If you define `YYPRINT', it should take three arguments. The
parser will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the
token type, and the token value (from `yylval').
For `yacc.c' only. Obsoleted by `%printer'.
Here is an example of `YYPRINT' suitable for the multi-function
calculator (*note Declarations for `mfcalc': Mfcalc Declarations.):
%{
static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
#define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
%}
... %% ... %% ...
static void
print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
{
if (type == VAR)
fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
else if (type == NUM)
fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
}
File: bison.info, Node: Invocation, Next: Other Languages, Prev: Debugging, Up: Top
9 Invoking Bison
****************
The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
bison INFILE
Here INFILE is the grammar file name, which usually ends in `.y'.
The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing the `.y'
with `.tab.c' and removing any leading directory. Thus, the `bison
foo.y' file name yields `foo.tab.c', and the `bison hack/foo.y' file
name yields `foo.tab.c'. It's also possible, in case you are writing
C++ code instead of C in your grammar file, to name it `foo.ypp' or
`foo.y++'. Then, the output files will take an extension like the
given one as input (respectively `foo.tab.cpp' and `foo.tab.c++'). This
feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
`-o' or `-d'.
For example :
bison -d INFILE.YXX
will produce `infile.tab.cxx' and `infile.tab.hxx', and
bison -d -o OUTPUT.C++ INFILE.Y
will produce `output.c++' and `outfile.h++'.
For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison distribution also
contains a shell script called `yacc' that invokes Bison with the `-y'
option.
* Menu:
* Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
in alphabetical order by short options.
* Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
* Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible `yylex' and `main'.
File: bison.info, Node: Bison Options, Next: Option Cross Key, Up: Invocation
9.1 Bison Options
=================
Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
option names. Long option names are indicated with `--' instead of
`-'. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they are
unique. When a long option takes an argument, like `--file-prefix',
connect the option name and the argument with `='.
Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized
by short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
option.
Operations modes:
`-h'
`--help'
Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
`-V'
`--version'
Print the version number of Bison and exit.
`--print-localedir'
Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
`--print-datadir'
Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
`-y'
`--yacc'
Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause
different diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in
other minor ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file
name conventions, so that the parser implementation file is called
`y.tab.c', and the other outputs are called `y.output' and
`y.tab.h'. Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C,
generate `#define' statements in addition to an `enum' to associate
token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script
can substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such
a script for compatibility with POSIX:
#! /bin/sh
bison -y "$@"
The `-y'/`--yacc' option is intended for use with traditional Yacc
grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension like
`%glr-parser', Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if this
option is specified.
`-W [CATEGORY]'
`--warnings[=CATEGORY]'
Output warnings falling in CATEGORY. CATEGORY can be one of:
`midrule-values'
Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within
any of the actions of the parent rule. For example, warn
about unused `$2' in:
exp: '1' { $$ = 1; } '+' exp { $$ = $1 + $4; };
Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
For example, warn about unset `$$' in the mid-rule action in:
exp: '1' { $1 = 1; } '+' exp { $$ = $2 + $4; };
These warnings are not enabled by default since they
sometimes prove to be false alarms in existing grammars
employing the Yacc constructs `$0' or `$-N' (where N is some
positive integer).
`yacc'
Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
`conflicts-sr'
`conflicts-rr'
S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by
default. However, if the `%expect' or `%expect-rr' directive
is specified, an unexpected number of conflicts is an error,
and an expected number of conflicts is not reported, so `-W'
and `--warning' then have no effect on the conflict report.
`other'
All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are
enabled by default.
This category is provided merely for the sake of
completeness. Future releases of Bison may move warnings
from this category to new, more specific categories.
`all'
All the warnings.
`none'
Turn off all the warnings.
`error'
Treat warnings as errors.
A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with `no-'. For
instance, `-Wno-yacc' will hide the warnings about POSIX Yacc
incompatibilities.
`-f [FEATURE]'
`--feature[=FEATURE]'
Activate miscellaneous FEATURE. FEATURE can be one of:
`caret'
`diagnostics-show-caret'
Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
`-fdiagnostics-show-caret', or Clang's `-fcaret-diagnotics'.
The location provided with the message is used to quote the
corresponding line of the source file, underlining the
important part of it with carets (^). Here is an example,
using the following file `in.y':
%type <ival> exp
%%
exp: exp '+' exp { $exp = $1 + $2; };
When invoked with `-fcaret', Bison will report:
in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
exp: exp '+' exp { $exp = $1 + $2; };
^^^^
in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
exp: exp '+' exp { $exp = $1 + $2; };
^^^
in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
exp: exp '+' exp { $exp = $1 + $2; };
^^^
in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
exp: exp '+' exp { $exp = $1 + $2; };
^^^
in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
exp: exp '+' exp { $exp = $1 + $2; };
^^
Tuning the parser:
`-t'
`--debug'
In the parser implementation file, define the macro `YYDEBUG' to 1
if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
compiled. *Note Tracing Your Parser: Tracing.
`-D NAME[=VALUE]'
`--define=NAME[=VALUE]'
`-F NAME[=VALUE]'
`--force-define=NAME[=VALUE]'
Each of these is equivalent to `%define NAME "VALUE"' (*note
%define Summary::) except that Bison processes multiple
definitions for the same NAME as follows:
* Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for NAME
except the last.
* If that command-line definition is specified by a `-D' or
`--define', Bison reports an error for any `%define'
definition for NAME.
* If that command-line definition is specified by a `-F' or
`--force-define' instead, Bison quietly ignores all `%define'
definitions for NAME.
* Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple
`%define' definitions for NAME.
You should avoid using `-F' and `--force-define' in your make
files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
any conflicting `%define' that may be added to the grammar file.
`-L LANGUAGE'
`--language=LANGUAGE'
Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
`%language' was specified (*note Bison Declaration Summary: Decl
Summary.). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
LANGUAGE is case-insensitive.
`--locations'
Pretend that `%locations' was specified. *Note Decl Summary::.
`-p PREFIX'
`--name-prefix=PREFIX'
Pretend that `%name-prefix "PREFIX"' was specified (*note Decl
Summary::). Obsoleted by `-Dapi.prefix=PREFIX'. *Note Multiple
Parsers in the Same Program: Multiple Parsers.
`-l'
`--no-lines'
Don't put any `#line' preprocessor commands in the parser
implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This
option causes them to associate errors with the parser
implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in
its own right.
`-S FILE'
`--skeleton=FILE'
Specify the skeleton to use, similar to `%skeleton' (*note Bison
Declaration Summary: Decl Summary.).
If FILE does not contain a `/', FILE is the name of a skeleton
file in the Bison installation directory. If it does, FILE is an
absolute file name or a file name relative to the current working
directory. This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
`-k'
`--token-table'
Pretend that `%token-table' was specified. *Note Decl Summary::.
Adjust the output:
`--defines[=FILE]'
Pretend that `%defines' was specified, i.e., write an extra output
file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined
in the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. *Note Decl
Summary::.
`-d'
This is the same as `--defines' except `-d' does not accept a FILE
argument since POSIX Yacc requires that `-d' can be bundled with
other short options.
`-b FILE-PREFIX'
`--file-prefix=PREFIX'
Pretend that `%file-prefix' was specified, i.e., specify prefix to
use for all Bison output file names. *Note Decl Summary::.
`-r THINGS'
`--report=THINGS'
Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the
comma separated list of THINGS among:
`state'
Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and
unresolved), and parser's automaton.
`itemset'
Implies `state' and augments the description of the automaton
with the full set of items for each state, instead of its
core only.
`lookahead'
Implies `state' and augments the description of the automaton
with each rule's lookahead set.
`solved'
Implies `state'. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
precedence and associativity directives.
`all'
Enable all the items.
`none'
Do not generate the report.
`--report-file=FILE'
Specify the FILE for the verbose description.
`-v'
`--verbose'
Pretend that `%verbose' was specified, i.e., write an extra output
file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and parser.
*Note Decl Summary::.
`-o FILE'
`--output=FILE'
Specify the FILE for the parser implementation file.
The other output files' names are constructed from FILE as
described under the `-v' and `-d' options.
`-g [FILE]'
`--graph[=FILE]'
Output a graphical representation of the parser's automaton
computed by Bison, in Graphviz (http://www.graphviz.org/) DOT
(http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html) format. `FILE' is
optional. If omitted and the grammar file is `foo.y', the output
file will be `foo.dot'.
`-x [FILE]'
`--xml[=FILE]'
Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
`FILE' is optional. If omitted and the grammar file is `foo.y',
the output file will be `foo.xml'. (The current XML schema is
experimental and may evolve. More user feedback will help to
stabilize it.)
File: bison.info, Node: Option Cross Key, Next: Yacc Library, Prev: Bison Options, Up: Invocation
9.2 Option Cross Key
====================
Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
the corresponding short option and directive.
Long Option Short Option Bison Directive
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`--debug' `-t' `%debug'
`--define=NAME[=VALUE]' `-D NAME[=VALUE]' `%define NAME ["VALUE"]'
`--defines[=FILE]' `-d' `%defines ["FILE"]'
`--feature[=FEATURE]' `-f [FEATURE]'
`--file-prefix=PREFIX' `-b PREFIX' `%file-prefix "PREFIX"'
`--force-define=NAME[=VALUE]' `-F NAME[=VALUE]' `%define NAME ["VALUE"]'
`--graph[=FILE]' `-g [FILE]'
`--help' `-h'
`--language=LANGUAGE' `-L LANGUAGE' `%language "LANGUAGE"'
`--locations' `%locations'
`--name-prefix=PREFIX' `-p PREFIX' `%name-prefix "PREFIX"'
`--no-lines' `-l' `%no-lines'
`--output=FILE' `-o FILE' `%output "FILE"'
`--print-datadir'
`--print-localedir'
`--report-file=FILE'
`--report=THINGS' `-r THINGS'
`--skeleton=FILE' `-S FILE' `%skeleton "FILE"'
`--token-table' `-k' `%token-table'
`--verbose' `-v' `%verbose'
`--version' `-V'
`--warnings[=CATEGORY]' `-W [CATEGORY]'
`--xml[=FILE]' `-x [FILE]'
`--yacc' `-y' `%yacc'
File: bison.info, Node: Yacc Library, Prev: Option Cross Key, Up: Invocation
9.3 Yacc Library
================
The Yacc library contains default implementations of the `yyerror' and
`main' functions. These default implementations are normally not
useful, but POSIX requires them. To use the Yacc library, link your
program with the `-ly' option. Note that Bison's implementation of the
Yacc library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public
License (*note Copying::).
If you use the Yacc library's `yyerror' function, you should declare
`yyerror' as follows:
int yyerror (char const *);
Bison ignores the `int' value returned by this `yyerror'. If you
use the Yacc library's `main' function, your `yyparse' function should
have the following type signature:
int yyparse (void);
File: bison.info, Node: Other Languages, Next: FAQ, Prev: Invocation, Up: Top
10 Parsers Written In Other Languages
*************************************
* Menu:
* C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
* Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
File: bison.info, Node: C++ Parsers, Next: Java Parsers, Up: Other Languages
10.1 C++ Parsers
================
* Menu:
* C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
* C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
* C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
* C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
* C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
* A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
File: bison.info, Node: C++ Bison Interface, Next: C++ Semantic Values, Up: C++ Parsers
10.1.1 C++ Bison Interface
--------------------------
The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
`%skeleton "lalr1.cc"', or the synonymous command-line option
`--skeleton=lalr1.cc'. *Note Decl Summary::.
When run, `bison' will create several entities in the `yy' namespace. Use
the `%define namespace' directive to change the namespace name, see
*note namespace: %define Summary. The various classes are generated in
the following files:
`position.hh'
`location.hh'
The definition of the classes `position' and `location', used for
location tracking. These files are not generated if the `%define'
variable `api.location.type' is defined. *Note C++ Location
Values::.
`stack.hh'
An auxiliary class `stack' used by the parser.
`FILE.hh'
`FILE.cc'
(Assuming the extension of the grammar file was `.yy'.) The
declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The
basename and extension of these two files follow the same rules as
with regular C parsers (*note Invocation::).
The header is _mandatory_; you must either pass `-d'/`--defines'
to `bison', or use the `%defines' directive.
All these files are documented using Doxygen; run `doxygen' for a
complete and accurate documentation.
File: bison.info, Node: C++ Semantic Values, Next: C++ Location Values, Prev: C++ Bison Interface, Up: C++ Parsers
10.1.2 C++ Semantic Values
--------------------------
The `%union' directive works as for C, see *note The Collection of
Value Types: Union Decl. In particular it produces a genuine
`union'(1), which have a few specific features in C++.
- The type `YYSTYPE' is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
`yy::parser::semantic_type'.
- Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
instance of classes with constructors in unions: only _pointers_
to such objects are allowed.
Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
reclaimed automatically: using the `%destructor' directive is the only
means to avoid leaks. *Note Freeing Discarded Symbols: Destructor Decl.
---------- Footnotes ----------
(1) In the future techniques to allow complex types within
pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
alleviate these issues.
File: bison.info, Node: C++ Location Values, Next: C++ Parser Interface, Prev: C++ Semantic Values, Up: C++ Parsers
10.1.3 C++ Location Values
--------------------------
When the directive `%locations' is used, the C++ parser supports
location tracking, see *note Tracking Locations::.
By default, two auxiliary classes define a `position', a single point
in a file, and a `location', a range composed of a pair of `position's
(possibly spanning several files). But if the `%define' variable
`api.location.type' is defined, then these classes will not be
generated, and the user defined type will be used.
In this section `uint' is an abbreviation for `unsigned int': in
genuine code only the latter is used.
* Menu:
* C++ position:: One point in the source file
* C++ location:: Two points in the source file
* User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
File: bison.info, Node: C++ position, Next: C++ location, Up: C++ Location Values
10.1.3.1 C++ `position'
.......................
-- Constructor on position: position (std::string* FILE = 0, uint
LINE = 1, uint COL = 1)
Create a `position' denoting a given point. Note that `file' is
not reclaimed when the `position' is destroyed: memory managed
must be handled elsewhere.
-- Method on position: void initialize (std::string* FILE = 0, uint
LINE = 1, uint COL = 1)
Reset the position to the given values.
-- Instance Variable of position: std::string* file
The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
feature you may change it to `TYPE*' using `%define filename_type
"TYPE"'.
-- Instance Variable of position: uint line
The line, starting at 1.
-- Method on position: uint lines (int HEIGHT = 1)
Advance by HEIGHT lines, resetting the column number.
-- Instance Variable of position: uint column
The column, starting at 1.
-- Method on position: uint columns (int WIDTH = 1)
Advance by WIDTH columns, without changing the line number.
-- Method on position: position& operator+= (int WIDTH)
-- Method on position: position operator+ (int WIDTH)
-- Method on position: position& operator-= (int WIDTH)
-- Method on position: position operator- (int WIDTH)
Various forms of syntactic sugar for `columns'.
-- Method on position: bool operator== (const position& THAT)
-- Method on position: bool operator!= (const position& THAT)
Whether `*this' and `that' denote equal/different positions.
-- Function: std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& O, const
position& P)
Report P on O like this: `FILE:LINE.COLUMN', or `LINE.COLUMN' if
FILE is null.
File: bison.info, Node: C++ location, Next: User Defined Location Type, Prev: C++ position, Up: C++ Location Values
10.1.3.2 C++ `location'
.......................
-- Constructor on location: location (const position& BEGIN, const
position& END)
Create a `Location' from the endpoints of the range.
-- Constructor on location: location (const position& POS =
position())
-- Constructor on location: location (std::string* FILE, uint LINE,
uint COL)
Create a `Location' denoting an empty range located at a given
point.
-- Method on location: void initialize (std::string* FILE = 0, uint
LINE = 1, uint COL = 1)
Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
-- Instance Variable of location: position begin
-- Instance Variable of location: position end
The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
-- Method on location: uint columns (int WIDTH = 1)
-- Method on location: uint lines (int HEIGHT = 1)
Advance the `end' position.
-- Method on location: location operator+ (const location& END)
-- Method on location: location operator+ (int WIDTH)
-- Method on location: location operator+= (int WIDTH)
Various forms of syntactic sugar.
-- Method on location: void step ()
Move `begin' onto `end'.
-- Method on location: bool operator== (const location& THAT)
-- Method on location: bool operator!= (const location& THAT)
Whether `*this' and `that' denote equal/different ranges of
positions.
-- Function: std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& O, const
location& P)
Report P on O, taking care of special cases such as: no `filename'
defined, or equal filename/line or column.
File: bison.info, Node: User Defined Location Type, Prev: C++ location, Up: C++ Location Values
10.1.3.3 User Defined Location Type
...................................
Instead of using the built-in types you may use the `%define' variable
`api.location.type' to specify your own type:
%define api.location.type LOCATIONTYPE
The requirements over your LOCATIONTYPE are:
* it must be copyable;
* in order to compute the (default) value of `@$' in a reduction, the
parser basically runs
@$.begin = @$1.begin;
@$.end = @$N.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
so there must be copyable `begin' and `end' members;
* alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default
location, in which case these members are not required (*note
Location Default Action::);
* if traces are enabled, then there must exist an `std::ostream&
operator<< (std::ostream& o, const LOCATIONTYPE& s)' function.
In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the `%define'
variable `api.location.type' to share a common set of built-in
definitions for `position' and `location'. For instance, one parser
`master/parser.yy' might use:
%defines
%locations
%define namespace "master::"
to generate the `master/position.hh' and `master/location.hh' files,
reused by other parsers as follows:
%define api.location.type "master::location"
%code requires { #include <master/location.hh> }
File: bison.info, Node: C++ Parser Interface, Next: C++ Scanner Interface, Prev: C++ Location Values, Up: C++ Parsers
10.1.4 C++ Parser Interface
---------------------------
The output files `OUTPUT.hh' and `OUTPUT.cc' declare and define the
parser class in the namespace `yy'. The class name defaults to
`parser', but may be changed using `%define parser_class_name "NAME"'.
The interface of this class is detailed below. It can be extended
using the `%parse-param' feature: its semantics is slightly changed
since it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
additional argument for its constructor.
-- Type of parser: semantic_type
-- Type of parser: location_type
The types for semantics value and locations.
-- Type of parser: token
A structure that contains (only) the `yytokentype' enumeration,
which defines the tokens. To refer to the token `FOO', use
`yy::parser::token::FOO'. The scanner can use `typedef
yy::parser::token token;' to "import" the token enumeration (*note
Calc++ Scanner::).
-- Method on parser: parser (TYPE1 ARG1, ...)
Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default,
unless `%parse-param {TYPE1 ARG1}' was used.
-- Method on parser: int parse ()
Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
The whole function is wrapped in a `try'/`catch' block, so that
when an exception is thrown, the `%destructor's are called to
release the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
-- Method on parser: std::ostream& debug_stream ()
-- Method on parser: void set_debug_stream (std::ostream& O)
Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
`std::cerr'.
-- Method on parser: debug_level_type debug_level ()
-- Method on parser: void set_debug_level (debug_level L)
Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no
trace, or nonzero, full tracing.
-- Method on parser: void error (const location_type& L, const
std::string& M)
The definition for this member function must be supplied by the
user: the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at L,
described by M.
File: bison.info, Node: C++ Scanner Interface, Next: A Complete C++ Example, Prev: C++ Parser Interface, Up: C++ Parsers
10.1.5 C++ Scanner Interface
----------------------------
The parser invokes the scanner by calling `yylex'. Contrary to C
parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
`%define api.pure full' directive. Therefore the interface is as
follows.
-- Method on parser: int yylex (semantic_type* YYLVAL, location_type*
YYLLOC, TYPE1 ARG1, ...)
Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
value and location being YYLVAL and YYLLOC. Invocations of
`%lex-param {TYPE1 ARG1}' yield additional arguments.
File: bison.info, Node: A Complete C++ Example, Prev: C++ Scanner Interface, Up: C++ Parsers
10.1.6 A Complete C++ Example
-----------------------------
This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
complete example. This example should be available on your system,
ready to compile, in the directory "../bison/examples/calc++". It
focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
actually easier to interface with.
* Menu:
* Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
* Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
* Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
* Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
* Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
File: bison.info, Node: Calc++ --- C++ Calculator, Next: Calc++ Parsing Driver, Up: A Complete C++ Example
10.1.6.1 Calc++ -- C++ Calculator
.................................
Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single expression,
possibly preceded by variable assignments. An environment containing
possibly predefined variables such as `one' and `two', is exchanged
with the parser. An example of valid input follows.
three := 3
seven := one + two * three
seven * seven
File: bison.info, Node: Calc++ Parsing Driver, Next: Calc++ Parser, Prev: Calc++ --- C++ Calculator, Up: A Complete C++ Example
10.1.6.2 Calc++ Parsing Driver
..............................
To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
technique of the "parsing context" is convenient: a structure
containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
"parsing driver" class.
The declaration of this driver class, `calc++-driver.hh', is as
follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
class.
#ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
# define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
# include <string>
# include <map>
# include "calc++-parser.hh"
Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects the
signature of `yylex' to be defined in the macro `YY_DECL', and the C++
parser expects it to be declared. We can factor both as follows.
// Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
# define YY_DECL \
yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
calcxx_driver& driver)
// ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
YY_DECL;
The `calcxx_driver' class is then declared with its most obvious
members.
// Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
class calcxx_driver
{
public:
calcxx_driver ();
virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
std::map<std::string, int> variables;
int result;
To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
// Handling the scanner.
void scan_begin ();
void scan_end ();
bool trace_scanning;
Similarly for the parser itself.
// Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
int parse (const std::string& f);
std::string file;
bool trace_parsing;
To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply dumping
them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the compiler
driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we close the
class declaration and CPP guard.
// Error handling.
void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
void error (const std::string& m);
};
#endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The `parse'
member function deserves some attention. The `error' functions are
simple stubs, they should actually register the located error messages
and set error state.
#include "calc++-driver.hh"
#include "calc++-parser.hh"
calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
: trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
{
variables["one"] = 1;
variables["two"] = 2;
}
calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
{
}
int
calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
{
file = f;
scan_begin ();
yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
int res = parser.parse ();
scan_end ();
return res;
}
void
calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
{
std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
}
void
calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
{
std::cerr << m << std::endl;
}
File: bison.info, Node: Calc++ Parser, Next: Calc++ Scanner, Prev: Calc++ Parsing Driver, Up: A Complete C++ Example
10.1.6.3 Calc++ Parser
......................
The grammar file `calc++-parser.yy' starts by asking for the C++
deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
the grammar for.
%skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
%require "2.7"
%defines
%define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the `%union'.
Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both
cannot include the header of the other. Because the driver's header
needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in particular its
inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply use a forward
declaration of the driver. *Note %code Summary::.
%code requires {
# include <string>
class calcxx_driver;
}
The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
global variables.
// The parsing context.
%parse-param { calcxx_driver& driver }
%lex-param { calcxx_driver& driver }
Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the first
location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed relatively
to the previous locations: the file name will be automatically
propagated.
%locations
%initial-action
{
// Initialize the initial location.
@$.begin.filename = @$.end.filename = &driver.file;
};
Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
error messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect
information (*note LAC::).
%debug
%error-verbose
Semantic values cannot use "real" objects, but only pointers to them.
// Symbols.
%union
{
int ival;
std::string *sval;
};
The code between `%code {' and `}' is output in the `*.cc' file; it
needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
%code {
# include "calc++-driver.hh"
}
The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
allows for nicer error messages referring to "end of file" instead of
"$end". Similarly user friendly named are provided for each symbol.
Note that the tokens names are prefixed by `TOKEN_' to avoid name
clashes.
%token END 0 "end of file"
%token ASSIGN ":="
%token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
%token <ival> NUMBER "number"
%type <ival> exp
To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use `%destructor'.
%printer { yyoutput << *$$; } "identifier"
%destructor { delete $$; } "identifier"
%printer { yyoutput << $$; } <ival>
The grammar itself is straightforward.
%%
%start unit;
unit: assignments exp { driver.result = $2; };
assignments:
/* Nothing. */ {}
| assignments assignment {};
assignment:
"identifier" ":=" exp
{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; };
%left '+' '-';
%left '*' '/';
exp: exp '+' exp { $$ = $1 + $3; }
| exp '-' exp { $$ = $1 - $3; }
| exp '*' exp { $$ = $1 * $3; }
| exp '/' exp { $$ = $1 / $3; }
| "identifier" { $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; }
| "number" { $$ = $1; };
%%
Finally the `error' member function registers the errors to the driver.
void
yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
const std::string& m)
{
driver.error (l, m);
}
File: bison.info, Node: Calc++ Scanner, Next: Calc++ Top Level, Prev: Calc++ Parser, Up: A Complete C++ Example
10.1.6.4 Calc++ Scanner
.......................
The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
%{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
# include <cstdlib>
# include <cerrno>
# include <climits>
# include <string>
# include "calc++-driver.hh"
# include "calc++-parser.hh"
/* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
# undef yywrap
# define yywrap() 1
/* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
not of token_type. */
#define yyterminate() return token::END
%}
Because there is no `#include'-like feature we don't need `yywrap', we
don't need `unput' either, and we parse an actual file, this is not an
interactive session with the user. Finally we enable the scanner
tracing features.
%option noyywrap nounput batch debug
Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
int [0-9]+
blank [ \t]
The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
time `yylex' is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is advanced
of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end cursor is
adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor is moved
onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks preceding tokens.
Comments would be treated equally.
%{
# define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
%}
%%
%{
yylloc->step ();
%}
{blank}+ yylloc->step ();
[\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
`yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier' into `token::identifier' for
instance.
%{
typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
%}
/* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
[-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
":=" return token::ASSIGN;
{int} {
errno = 0;
long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
yylval->ival = n;
return token::NUMBER;
}
{id} {
yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext);
return token::IDENTIFIER;
}
. driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
%%
Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend on
the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
void
calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
{
yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
if (file.empty () || file == "-")
yyin = stdin;
else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
{
error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
void
calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
{
fclose (yyin);
}
File: bison.info, Node: Calc++ Top Level, Prev: Calc++ Scanner, Up: A Complete C++ Example
10.1.6.5 Calc++ Top Level
.........................
The top level file, `calc++.cc', poses no problem.
#include <iostream>
#include "calc++-driver.hh"
int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
calcxx_driver driver;
for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
driver.trace_parsing = true;
else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
driver.trace_scanning = true;
else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
}
File: bison.info, Node: Java Parsers, Prev: C++ Parsers, Up: Other Languages
10.2 Java Parsers
=================
* Menu:
* Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
* Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
* Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
* Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
* Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
* Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
* Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
* Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
File: bison.info, Node: Java Bison Interface, Next: Java Semantic Values, Up: Java Parsers
10.2.1 Java Bison Interface
---------------------------
(The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve. More user
feedback will help to stabilize it.)
The Java parser skeletons are selected using the `%language "Java"'
directive or the `-L java'/`--language=java' option.
When generating a Java parser, `bison BASENAME.y' will create a
single Java source file named `BASENAME.java' containing the parser
implementation. Using a grammar file without a `.y' suffix is
currently broken. The basename of the parser implementation file can
be changed by the `%file-prefix' directive or the `-p'/`--name-prefix'
option. The entire parser implementation file name can be changed by
the `%output' directive or the `-o'/`--output' option. The parser
implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
Therefore, all Java parsers are "pure", and the `%pure-parser' and
`%define api.pure full' directives does not do anything when used in
Java.
Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and `%define
api.push-pull' have no effect.
GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
`glr-parser' directive.
No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
`%defines' directive or the `-d'/`--defines' options.
Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always
compiled in. Thus the `%debug' and `%token-table' directives and the
`-t'/`--debug' and `-k'/`--token-table' options have no effect. This
may change in the future to eliminate unused code in the generated
parser, so use `%debug' and `%verbose-error' explicitly if needed.
Also, in the future the `%token-table' directive might enable a public
interface to access the token names and codes.
File: bison.info, Node: Java Semantic Values, Next: Java Location Values, Prev: Java Bison Interface, Up: Java Parsers
10.2.2 Java Semantic Values
---------------------------
There is no `%union' directive in Java parsers. Instead, the semantic
values' types (class names) should be specified in the `%type' or
`%token' directive:
%type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
%type <Integer> number
By default, the semantic stack is declared to have `Object' members,
which means that the class types you specify can be of any class. To
improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
superclass of all the semantic values using the `%define stype'
directive. For example, after the following declaration:
%define stype "ASTNode"
any `%type' or `%token' specifying a semantic type which is not a
subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
Java parsers do not support `%destructor', since the language adopts
garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references to semantic
values for as little time as needed.
Java parsers do not support `%printer', as `toString()' can be used
to print the semantic values. This however may change (in a
backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
File: bison.info, Node: Java Location Values, Next: Java Parser Interface, Prev: Java Semantic Values, Up: Java Parsers
10.2.3 Java Location Values
---------------------------
When the directive `%locations' is used, the Java parser supports
location tracking, see *note Tracking Locations::. An auxiliary
user-defined class defines a "position", a single point in a file;
Bison itself defines a class representing a "location", a range
composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several files). The
location class is an inner class of the parser; the name is `Location'
by default, and may also be renamed using `%define api.location.type
"CLASS-NAME"'.
The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
By default, the class name is `Position', but this can be changed with
`%define api.position.type "CLASS-NAME"'. This class must be supplied
by the user.
-- Instance Variable of Location: Position begin
-- Instance Variable of Location: Position end
The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
-- Constructor on Location: Location (Position LOC)
Create a `Location' denoting an empty range located at a given
point.
-- Constructor on Location: Location (Position BEGIN, Position END)
Create a `Location' from the endpoints of the range.
-- Method on Location: String toString ()
Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
properly, the position class should override the `equals' and
`toString' methods appropriately.
File: bison.info, Node: Java Parser Interface, Next: Java Scanner Interface, Prev: Java Location Values, Up: Java Parsers
10.2.4 Java Parser Interface
----------------------------
The name of the generated parser class defaults to `YYParser'. The
`YY' prefix may be changed using the `%name-prefix' directive or the
`-p'/`--name-prefix' option. Alternatively, use `%define
parser_class_name "NAME"' to give a custom name to the class. The
interface of this class is detailed below.
By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
`%define public' will change to public visibility. Remember that,
according to the Java language specification, the name of the `.java'
file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you
can use `abstract', `final' and `strictfp' with the `%define'
declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
`%define package' directive. The superclass and the implemented
interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the `%define
extends' and `%define implements' directives.
The parser class defines an inner class, `Location', that is used
for location tracking (see *note Java Location Values::), and a inner
interface, `Lexer' (see *note Java Scanner Interface::). Other than
these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a `yy' or
`YY' prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
The parser class can be extended using the `%parse-param' directive.
Each occurrence of the directive will add a `protected final' field to
the parser class, and an argument to its constructor, which initialize
them automatically.
Token names defined by `%token' and the predefined `EOF' token name
are added as constant fields to the parser class.
-- Constructor on YYParser: YYParser (LEX_PARAM, ..., PARSE_PARAM,
...)
Build a new parser object with embedded `%code lexer'. There are
no parameters, unless `%parse-param's and/or `%lex-param's are
used.
-- Constructor on YYParser: YYParser (Lexer LEXER, PARSE_PARAM, ...)
Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are
no additional parameters unless `%parse-param's are used.
If the scanner is defined by `%code lexer', this constructor is
declared `protected' and is called automatically with a scanner
created with the correct `%lex-param's.
-- Method on YYParser: boolean parse ()
Run the syntactic analysis, and return `true' on success, `false'
otherwise.
-- Method on YYParser: boolean recovering ()
During the syntactic analysis, return `true' if recovering from a
syntax error. *Note Error Recovery::.
-- Method on YYParser: java.io.PrintStream getDebugStream ()
-- Method on YYParser: void setDebugStream (java.io.printStream O)
Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
`System.err'.
-- Method on YYParser: int getDebugLevel ()
-- Method on YYParser: void setDebugLevel (int L)
Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no
trace, or nonzero, full tracing.
File: bison.info, Node: Java Scanner Interface, Next: Java Action Features, Prev: Java Parser Interface, Up: Java Parsers
10.2.5 Java Scanner Interface
-----------------------------
There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by `%code lexer', or defined
elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the `Lexer'
inner interface of the parser class.
In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in `%code
lexer' blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the parser
constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with `%lex-param';
they are passed before `%parse-param's to the constructor.
In the second case, the scanner has to implement the `Lexer'
interface, which is defined within the parser class (e.g.,
`YYParser.Lexer'). The constructor of the parser object will then
accept an object implementing the interface; `%lex-param' is not used
in this case.
In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
-- Method on Lexer: void yyerror (Location LOC, String MSG)
This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The
first parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active.
Its type can be changed using `%define api.location.type
"CLASS-NAME".'
-- Method on Lexer: int yylex ()
Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in
the interface.
Use `%define lex_throws' to specify any uncaught exceptions.
Default is `java.io.IOException'.
-- Method on Lexer: Position getStartPos ()
-- Method on Lexer: Position getEndPos ()
Return respectively the first position of the last token that
`yylex' returned, and the first position beyond it. These methods
are not needed unless location tracking is active.
The return type can be changed using `%define api.position.type
"CLASS-NAME".'
-- Method on Lexer: Object getLVal ()
Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
The return type can be changed using `%define stype "CLASS-NAME".'
File: bison.info, Node: Java Action Features, Next: Java Differences, Prev: Java Scanner Interface, Up: Java Parsers
10.2.6 Special Features for Use in Java Actions
-----------------------------------------------
The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions. Other
analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
Use `%define throws' to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
actions, and initial actions specified by `%initial-action'.
-- Variable: $N
The semantic value for the Nth component of the current rule.
This may not be assigned to. *Note Java Semantic Values::.
-- Variable: $<TYPEALT>N
Like `$N' but specifies a alternative type TYPEALT. *Note Java
Semantic Values::.
-- Variable: $$
The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
value, this is in the base type (`Object' or as specified by
`%define stype') as in not cast to the declared subtype because
casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed. *Note
Java Semantic Values::.
-- Variable: $<TYPEALT>$
Same as `$$' since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
Perhaps we should use this and `$<>$' for the value and `$$' for
setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
these constructs. *Note Java Semantic Values::.
-- Variable: @N
The location information of the Nth component of the current rule.
This may not be assigned to. *Note Java Location Values::.
-- Variable: @$
The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
*Note Java Location Values::.
-- Statement: return YYABORT `;'
Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure. *Note
Java Parser Interface::.
-- Statement: return YYACCEPT `;'
Return immediately from the parser, indicating success. *Note
Java Parser Interface::.
-- Statement: return YYERROR `;'
Start error recovery (without printing an error message). *Note
Error Recovery::.
-- Function: boolean recovering ()
Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the
parser reads token until it reaches a known state, and then
restarts normal operation. *Note Error Recovery::.
-- Function: protected void yyerror (String msg)
-- Function: protected void yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
-- Function: protected void yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
Print an error message using the `yyerror' method of the scanner
instance in use.
File: bison.info, Node: Java Differences, Next: Java Declarations Summary, Prev: Java Action Features, Up: Java Parsers
10.2.7 Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
--------------------------------------------------
The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
section summarizes these differences.
* Java lacks a preprocessor, so the `YYERROR', `YYACCEPT', `YYABORT'
symbols (*note Table of Symbols::) cannot obviously be macros.
Instead, they should be preceded by `return' when they appear in
an action. The actual definition of these symbols is opaque to
the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The only
meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them. *Note
Java Action Features::.
Note that of these three symbols, only `YYACCEPT' and `YYABORT'
will cause a return from the `yyparse' method(1).
* Java lacks unions, so `%union' has no effect. Instead, semantic
values have a common base type: `Object' or as specified by
`%define stype'. Angle brackets on `%token', `type', `$N' and
`$$' specify subtypes rather than fields of an union. The type of
`$$', even with angle brackets, is the base type since Java casts
are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments. Also, `$N'
and `@N' are not allowed on the left-hand side of assignments.
*Note Java Semantic Values::, and *note Java Action Features::.
* The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++
code.
`%code imports'
blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code.
They may include copyright notices. For a `package'
declarations, it is suggested to use `%define package'
instead.
unqualified `%code'
blocks are placed inside the parser class.
`%code lexer'
blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any
class that implements the appropriate interface (*note Java
Scanner Interface::).
Other `%code' blocks are not supported in Java parsers. In
particular, `%{ ... %}' blocks should not be used and may give an
error in future versions of Bison.
The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can be
used to define other classes used by the parser _outside_ the
parser class.
---------- Footnotes ----------
(1) Java parsers include the actions in a separate method than
`yyparse' in order to have an intuitive syntax that corresponds to
these C macros.
File: bison.info, Node: Java Declarations Summary, Prev: Java Differences, Up: Java Parsers
10.2.8 Java Declarations Summary
--------------------------------
This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
meaning when used in a Java parser.
-- Directive: %language "Java"
Generate a Java class for the parser.
-- Directive: %lex-param {TYPE NAME}
A parameter for the lexer class defined by `%code lexer' _only_,
added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
constructor that _creates_ a lexer. Default is none. *Note Java
Scanner Interface::.
-- Directive: %name-prefix "PREFIX"
The prefix of the parser class name `PREFIXParser' if `%define
parser_class_name' is not used. Default is `YY'. *Note Java
Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %parse-param {TYPE NAME}
A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to
constructor(s) and as fields initialized by the constructor(s).
Default is none. *Note Java Parser Interface::.
-- Directive: %token <TYPE> TOKEN ...
Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java
_type_. *Note Java Semantic Values::.
-- Directive: %type <TYPE> NONTERMINAL ...
Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets
enclose a Java _type_. *Note Java Semantic Values::.
-- Directive: %code { CODE ... }
Code appended to the inside of the parser class. *Note Java
Differences::.
-- Directive: %code imports { CODE ... }
Code inserted just after the `package' declaration. *Note Java
Differences::.
-- Directive: %code lexer { CODE ... }
Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser
class. *Note Java Scanner Interface::.
-- Directive: %% CODE ...
Code (after the second `%%') appended to the end of the file,
_outside_ the parser class. *Note Java Differences::.
-- Directive: %{ CODE ... %}
Not supported. Use `%code import' instead. *Note Java
Differences::.
-- Directive: %define abstract
Whether the parser class is declared `abstract'. Default is false.
*Note Java Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %define extends "SUPERCLASS"
The superclass of the parser class. Default is none. *Note Java
Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %define final
Whether the parser class is declared `final'. Default is false.
*Note Java Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %define implements "INTERFACES"
The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated
list. Default is none. *Note Java Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %define lex_throws "EXCEPTIONS"
The exceptions thrown by the `yylex' method of the lexer, a
comma-separated list. Default is `java.io.IOException'. *Note
Java Scanner Interface::.
-- Directive: %define api.location.type "CLASS"
The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the
parser class by `bison'. Default is `Location'. Formerly named
`location_type'. *Note Java Location Values::.
-- Directive: %define package "PACKAGE"
The package to put the parser class in. Default is none. *Note
Java Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %define parser_class_name "NAME"
The name of the parser class. Default is `YYParser' or
`NAME-PREFIXParser'. *Note Java Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %define api.position.type "CLASS"
The name of the class used for positions. This class must be
supplied by the user. Default is `Position'. Formerly named
`position_type'. *Note Java Location Values::.
-- Directive: %define public
Whether the parser class is declared `public'. Default is false.
*Note Java Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %define stype "CLASS"
The base type of semantic values. Default is `Object'. *Note
Java Semantic Values::.
-- Directive: %define strictfp
Whether the parser class is declared `strictfp'. Default is false.
*Note Java Bison Interface::.
-- Directive: %define throws "EXCEPTIONS"
The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
`%initial-action', a comma-separated list. Default is none.
*Note Java Parser Interface::.
File: bison.info, Node: FAQ, Next: Table of Symbols, Prev: Other Languages, Up: Top
11 Frequently Asked Questions
*****************************
Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
are addressed.
* Menu:
* Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
* How Can I Reset the Parser:: `yyparse' Keeps some State
* Strings are Destroyed:: `yylval' Loses Track of Strings
* Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
* Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
* Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
* I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
* Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
* Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
* More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
* Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
* Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
File: bison.info, Node: Memory Exhausted, Next: How Can I Reset the Parser, Up: FAQ
11.1 Memory Exhausted
=====================
My parser returns with error with a `memory exhausted' message.
What can I do?
This question is already addressed elsewhere, see *note Recursive
Rules: Recursion.
File: bison.info, Node: How Can I Reset the Parser, Next: Strings are Destroyed, Prev: Memory Exhausted, Up: FAQ
11.2 How Can I Reset the Parser
===============================
The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
following typical questions:
I invoke `yyparse' several times, and on correct input it works
properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
too. How can I reset the error flag of `yyparse'?
or
My parser includes support for an `#include'-like feature, in
which case I run `yyparse' from `yyparse'. This fails although I
did specify `%define api.pure full'.
These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
demonstration, consider the following source file, `first-line.l':
%{
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
%}
%%
.*\n ECHO; return 1;
%%
int
yyparse (char const *file)
{
yyin = fopen (file, "r");
if (!yyin)
{
perror ("fopen");
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
/* One token only. */
yylex ();
if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
{
perror ("fclose");
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
return 0;
}
int
main (void)
{
yyparse ("input");
yyparse ("input");
return 0;
}
If the file `input' contains
input:1: Hello,
input:2: World!
then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
$ flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l
$ gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll
$ ./first-line
input:1: Hello,
input:2: World!
Therefore, whenever you change `yyin', you must tell the
Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
`YY_FLUSH_BUFFER' after each change to `yyin'. If your Flex-generated
scanner needs to read from several input streams to handle features
like include files, you might consider using Flex functions like
`yy_switch_to_buffer' that manipulate multiple input buffers.
If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (*note Start
conditions: (flex)Start conditions.), you might also want to reset the
scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial start condition, through
a call to `BEGIN (0)'.
File: bison.info, Node: Strings are Destroyed, Next: Implementing Gotos/Loops, Prev: How Can I Reset the Parser, Up: FAQ
11.3 Strings are Destroyed
==========================
My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
them. Instead of reporting `"foo", "bar"', it reports `"bar",
"bar"', or even `"foo\nbar", "bar"'.
This error is probably the single most frequent "bug report" sent to
Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
%{
#include <stdio.h>
char *yylval = NULL;
%}
%%
.* yylval = yytext; return 1;
\n /* IGNORE */
%%
int
main ()
{
/* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
return 0;
}
If you compile and run this code, you get:
$ flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l
$ gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll
$ printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines
"one
two", "two"
this is because `yytext' is a buffer provided for _reading_ in the
action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it (e.g.,
using `strdup'). Note that the output may depend on how your
implementation of Lex handles `yytext'. For instance, when given the
Lex compatibility option `-l' (which triggers the option `%array') Flex
generates a different behavior:
$ flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l
$ gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll
$ printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines
"two", "two"
File: bison.info, Node: Implementing Gotos/Loops, Next: Multiple start-symbols, Prev: Strings are Destroyed, Up: FAQ
11.4 Implementing Gotos/Loops
=============================
My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and
functions, but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
the distinction to make between the parser--whose job is to recover the
structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of the
program--and the processing (such as the execution) of this structure.
This works well with so called straight line programs, i.e., precisely
those that have a straightforward execution model: execute simple
instructions one after the others.
If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has recovered;
this tree is usually called the "abstract syntax tree", or "AST" for
short. Then, walking through this tree, traversing it in various ways,
will enable treatments such as its execution or its translation, which
will result in an interpreter or a compiler.
This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
invited to consult the dedicated literature.
File: bison.info, Node: Multiple start-symbols, Next: Secure? Conform?, Prev: Implementing Gotos/Loops, Up: FAQ
11.5 Multiple start-symbols
===========================
I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share
their implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but
with multiple entry points.
Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
simple means to simulate them. If `foo' and `bar' are the two pseudo
start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say `START_FOO' and
`START_BAR', and use them as switches from the real start-symbol:
%token START_FOO START_BAR;
%start start;
start:
START_FOO foo
| START_BAR bar;
These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as
the parser goes, that is all that is needed.
Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
simple means to do it: recall that anything between `%{ ... %}' after
the first `%%' is copied verbatim in the top of the generated `yylex'
function. Make sure a variable `start_token' is available in the
scanner (e.g., a global variable or using `%lex-param' etc.), and use
the following:
/* Prologue. */
%%
%{
if (start_token)
{
int t = start_token;
start_token = 0;
return t;
}
%}
/* The rules. */
File: bison.info, Node: Secure? Conform?, Next: I can't build Bison, Prev: Multiple start-symbols, Up: FAQ
11.6 Secure? Conform?
======================
Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide
it. However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms
to the POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems, please
send us a bug report.
File: bison.info, Node: I can't build Bison, Next: Where can I find help?, Prev: Secure? Conform?, Up: FAQ
11.7 I can't build Bison
========================
I can't build Bison because `make' complains that `msgfmt' is not
found. What should I do?
Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that
feature is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the
`po' subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with `--disable-nls' to
turn off this support, or you can install GNU gettext from
`ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/' and re-configure Bison. See the file
`ABOUT-NLS' for more information.
File: bison.info, Node: Where can I find help?, Next: Bug Reports, Prev: I can't build Bison, Up: FAQ
11.8 Where can I find help?
===========================
I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
<help-bison@gnu.org>. This mailing list is intended to be populated
with people who are willing to answer questions about using and
installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on the
list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!), so
you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can be
frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
hearts.
File: bison.info, Node: Bug Reports, Next: More Languages, Prev: Where can I find help?, Up: FAQ
11.9 Bug Reports
================
I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
version. Check `ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/' or one of its
mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
easier it will be to fix the bug.
Include information about your compilation environment, including
your operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
`configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not
hesitate to send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
Send bug reports to <bug-bison@gnu.org>.
File: bison.info, Node: More Languages, Next: Beta Testing, Prev: Bug Reports, Up: FAQ
11.10 More Languages
====================
Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about INSERT YOUR
FAVORITE LANGUAGE HERE?
C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to
add other languages; contributions are welcome.
File: bison.info, Node: Beta Testing, Next: Mailing Lists, Prev: More Languages, Up: FAQ
11.11 Beta Testing
==================
What is involved in being a beta tester?
It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
essentially halted.
Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which
the developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy
access to recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other
operating systems are especially welcome.
File: bison.info, Node: Mailing Lists, Prev: Beta Testing, Up: FAQ
11.12 Mailing Lists
===================
How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
See `http://lists.gnu.org/'.
File: bison.info, Node: Table of Symbols, Next: Glossary, Prev: FAQ, Up: Top
Appendix A Bison Symbols
************************
-- Variable: @$
In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
*Note Tracking Locations::.
-- Variable: @N
-- Symbol: @N
In an action, the location of the N-th symbol of the right-hand
side of the rule. *Note Tracking Locations::.
In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a
mid-rule action with a semantical value. *Note Mid-Rule Action
Translation::.
-- Variable: @NAME
-- Variable: @[NAME]
In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by NAME. *Note
Tracking Locations::.
-- Symbol: $@N
In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a
mid-rule action with no semantical value. *Note Mid-Rule Action
Translation::.
-- Variable: $$
In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
*Note Actions::.
-- Variable: $N
In an action, the semantic value of the N-th symbol of the
right-hand side of the rule. *Note Actions::.
-- Variable: $NAME
-- Variable: $[NAME]
In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by NAME.
*Note Actions::.
-- Delimiter: %%
Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the Bison
declarations section or the epilogue. *Note The Overall Layout of
a Bison Grammar: Grammar Layout.
-- Delimiter: %{CODE%}
All code listed between `%{' and `%}' is copied verbatim to the
parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of the
grammar file. *Note Outline of a Bison Grammar: Grammar Outline.
-- Construct: /* ... */
-- Construct: // ...
Comments, as in C/C++.
-- Delimiter: :
Separates a rule's result from its components. *Note Syntax of
Grammar Rules: Rules.
-- Delimiter: ;
Terminates a rule. *Note Syntax of Grammar Rules: Rules.
-- Delimiter: |
Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal. *Note
Syntax of Grammar Rules: Rules.
-- Directive: <*>
Used to define a default tagged `%destructor' or default tagged
`%printer'.
This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to
determine whether it should become a permanent feature.
*Note Freeing Discarded Symbols: Destructor Decl.
-- Directive: <>
Used to define a default tagless `%destructor' or default tagless
`%printer'.
This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to
determine whether it should become a permanent feature.
*Note Freeing Discarded Symbols: Destructor Decl.
-- Symbol: $accept
The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is `$accept: START
$end', where START is the start symbol. *Note The Start-Symbol:
Start Decl. It cannot be used in the grammar.
-- Directive: %code {CODE}
-- Directive: %code QUALIFIER {CODE}
Insert CODE verbatim into the output parser source at the default
location or at the location specified by QUALIFIER. *Note %code
Summary::.
-- Directive: %debug
Equip the parser for debugging. *Note Decl Summary::.
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE VALUE
-- Directive: %define VARIABLE "VALUE"
Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. *Note %define
Summary::.
-- Directive: %defines
Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
meant for the scanner. *Note Decl Summary::.
-- Directive: %defines DEFINES-FILE
Same as above, but save in the file DEFINES-FILE. *Note Decl
Summary::.
-- Directive: %destructor
Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
discarded symbols. *Note Freeing Discarded Symbols: Destructor
Decl.
-- Directive: %dprec
Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at
parse time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. *Note Writing GLR
Parsers: GLR Parsers.
-- Symbol: $end
The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It
cannot be used in the grammar.
-- Symbol: error
A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used
in grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an
error in the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a
sentence containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a
syntax error, the token `error' becomes the current lookahead
token. Actions corresponding to `error' are then executed, and
the lookahead token is reset to the token that originally caused
the violation. *Note Error Recovery::.
-- Directive: %error-verbose
Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message
strings when `yyerror' is called. *Note Error Reporting::.
-- Directive: %file-prefix "PREFIX"
Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. *Note
Decl Summary::.
-- Directive: %glr-parser
Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. *Note Writing GLR
Parsers: GLR Parsers.
-- Directive: %initial-action
Run user code before parsing. *Note Performing Actions before
Parsing: Initial Action Decl.
-- Directive: %language
Specify the programming language for the generated parser. *Note
Decl Summary::.
-- Directive: %left
Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s). *Note
Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.
-- Directive: %lex-param {ARGUMENT-DECLARATION}
Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
`yylex' should accept. *Note Calling Conventions for Pure
Parsers: Pure Calling.
-- Directive: %merge
Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If
there is a reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same
merging function, the function is applied to the two semantic
values to get a single result. *Note Writing GLR Parsers: GLR
Parsers.
-- Directive: %name-prefix "PREFIX"
Obsoleted by the `%define' variable `api.prefix' (*note Multiple
Parsers in the Same Program: Multiple Parsers.).
Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the
parser so that they start with PREFIX instead of `yy'. Contrary to
`api.prefix', do no rename types and macros.
The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is `yyparse',
`yylex', `yyerror', `yynerrs', `yylval', `yychar', `yydebug', and
(if locations are used) `yylloc'. If you use a push parser,
`yypush_parse', `yypull_parse', `yypstate', `yypstate_new' and
`yypstate_delete' will also be renamed. For example, if you use
`%name-prefix "c_"', the names become `c_parse', `c_lex', and so
on. For C++ parsers, see the `%define namespace' documentation in
this section.
-- Directive: %no-lines
Bison declaration to avoid generating `#line' directives in the
parser implementation file. *Note Decl Summary::.
-- Directive: %nonassoc
Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s). *Note
Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.
-- Directive: %output "FILE"
Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation
file. *Note Decl Summary::.
-- Directive: %parse-param {ARGUMENT-DECLARATION}
Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
`yyparse' should accept. *Note The Parser Function `yyparse':
Parser Function.
-- Directive: %prec
Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
*Note Context-Dependent Precedence: Contextual Precedence.
-- Directive: %pure-parser
Deprecated version of `%define api.pure' (*note api.pure: %define
Summary.), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
unreasonable usage.
-- Directive: %require "VERSION"
Require version VERSION or higher of Bison. *Note Require a
Version of Bison: Require Decl.
-- Directive: %right
Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
*Note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.
-- Directive: %skeleton
Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development. *Note Decl
Summary::.
-- Directive: %start
Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. *Note The
Start-Symbol: Start Decl.
-- Directive: %token
Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying
precedence. *Note Token Type Names: Token Decl.
-- Directive: %token-table
Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
implementation file. *Note Decl Summary::.
-- Directive: %type
Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. *Note Nonterminal
Symbols: Type Decl.
-- Symbol: $undefined
The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
`yylex' are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
`error'.
-- Directive: %union
Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for
semantic values. *Note The Collection of Value Types: Union Decl.
-- Macro: YYABORT
Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred,
by making `yyparse' return 1 immediately. The error reporting
function `yyerror' is not called. *Note The Parser Function
`yyparse': Parser Function.
For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using `return
YYABORT;' instead.
-- Macro: YYACCEPT
Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
read, by making `yyparse' return 0 immediately. *Note The Parser
Function `yyparse': Parser Function.
For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using `return
YYACCEPT;' instead.
-- Macro: YYBACKUP
Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
token. *Note Special Features for Use in Actions: Action Features.
-- Variable: yychar
External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
`yyparse'.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
*Note Special Features for Use in Actions: Action Features.
-- Variable: yyclearin
Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
lookahead token. *Note Error Recovery::.
-- Macro: YYDEBUG
Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. *Note
Tracing Your Parser: Tracing.
-- Variable: yydebug
External integer variable set to zero by default. If `yydebug' is
given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
symbols and parser action. *Note Tracing Your Parser: Tracing.
-- Macro: yyerrok
Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
after a syntax error. *Note Error Recovery::.
-- Macro: YYERROR
Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error;
however, it does not call `yyerror', and does not print any
message. If you want to print an error message, call `yyerror'
explicitly before the `YYERROR;' statement. *Note Error
Recovery::.
For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using `return
YYERROR;' instead.
-- Function: yyerror
User-supplied function to be called by `yyparse' on error. *Note
The Error Reporting Function `yyerror': Error Reporting.
-- Macro: YYERROR_VERBOSE
An obsolete macro that you define with `#define' in the prologue
to request verbose, specific error message strings when `yyerror'
is called. It doesn't matter what definition you use for
`YYERROR_VERBOSE', just whether you define it. Supported by the C
skeletons only; using `%error-verbose' is preferred. *Note Error
Reporting::.
-- Macro: YYFPRINTF
Macro used to output run-time traces. *Note Enabling Traces::.
-- Macro: YYINITDEPTH
Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack. *Note
Memory Management::.
-- Function: yylex
User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments
to get the next token. *Note The Lexical Analyzer Function
`yylex': Lexical.
-- Macro: YYLEX_PARAM
An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of
extra arguments) for `yyparse' to pass to `yylex'. The use of this
macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
*Note Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers: Pure Calling.
-- Variable: yylloc
External variable in which `yylex' should place the line and column
numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
variable within `yyparse', and its address is passed to `yylex'.)
You can ignore this variable if you don't use the `@' feature in
the grammar actions. *Note Textual Locations of Tokens: Token
Locations. In semantic actions, it stores the location of the
lookahead token. *Note Actions and Locations: Actions and
Locations.
-- Type: YYLTYPE
Data type of `yylloc'; by default, a structure with four members.
*Note Data Types of Locations: Location Type.
-- Variable: yylval
External variable in which `yylex' should place the semantic value
associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
variable within `yyparse', and its address is passed to `yylex'.)
*Note Semantic Values of Tokens: Token Values. In semantic
actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
*Note Actions: Actions.
-- Macro: YYMAXDEPTH
Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. *Note
Memory Management::.
-- Variable: yynerrs
Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a
syntax error. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
`yyparse'. In a pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
*Note The Error Reporting Function `yyerror': Error Reporting.
-- Function: yyparse
The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
parsing. *Note The Parser Function `yyparse': Parser Function.
-- Macro: YYPRINT
Macro used to output token semantic values. For `yacc.c' only.
Obsoleted by `%printer'. *Note The `YYPRINT' Macro: The YYPRINT
Macro.
-- Function: yypstate_delete
The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in
push mode; call this function to delete the memory associated with
a parser. *Note The Parser Delete Function `yypstate_delete':
Parser Delete Function. (The current push parsing interface is
experimental and may evolve. More user feedback will help to
stabilize it.)
-- Function: yypstate_new
The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in
push mode; call this function to create a new parser. *Note The
Parser Create Function `yypstate_new': Parser Create Function.
(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
-- Function: yypull_parse
The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this
function to parse the rest of the input stream. *Note The Pull
Parser Function `yypull_parse': Pull Parser Function. (The
current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
-- Function: yypush_parse
The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this
function to parse a single token. *Note The Push Parser Function
`yypush_parse': Push Parser Function. (The current push parsing
interface is experimental and may evolve. More user feedback will
help to stabilize it.)
-- Macro: YYPARSE_PARAM
An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
`yyparse' should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
is supported only for Yacc like parsers. *Note Calling
Conventions for Pure Parsers: Pure Calling.
-- Macro: YYRECOVERING
The expression `YYRECOVERING ()' yields 1 when the parser is
recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise. *Note Special
Features for Use in Actions: Action Features.
-- Macro: YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
Macro used to control the use of `alloca' when the deterministic
parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0, the
parser will use `malloc' to extend its stacks. If defined to 1,
the parser will use `alloca'. Values other than 0 and 1 are
reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
`YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA' defaults to 0.
In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you
should set `YYMAXDEPTH' to a value that cannot possibly result in
unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when `alloca'
is called. You can inspect the code that Bison generates in order
to determine the proper numeric values. This will require some
expertise in low-level implementation details.
-- Type: YYSTYPE
Data type of semantic values; `int' by default. *Note Data Types
of Semantic Values: Value Type.
File: bison.info, Node: Glossary, Next: Copying This Manual, Prev: Table of Symbols, Up: Top
Appendix B Glossary
*******************
Accepting state
A state whose only action is the accept action. The accepting
state is thus a consistent state. *Note Understanding Your
Parser: Understanding.
Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called "Backus Normal Form")
Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally
proposed by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in
his 1960-01-02 committee document contributing to what became the
Algol 60 report. *Note Languages and Context-Free Grammars:
Language and Grammar.
Consistent state
A state containing only one possible action. *Note Default
Reductions::.
Context-free grammars
Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of
context. Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can
be used as an expression, integers are allowed _anywhere_ an
expression is permitted. *Note Languages and Context-Free
Grammars: Language and Grammar.
Default reduction
The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser
state contains no other action for the lookahead token. In
permitted parser states, Bison declares the reduction with the
largest lookahead set to be the default reduction and removes that
lookahead set. *Note Default Reductions::.
Defaulted state
A consistent state with a default reduction. *Note Default
Reductions::.
Dynamic allocation
Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
compile time or on entry to a function.
Empty string
Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
character string of length zero.
Finite-state stack machine
A "machine" that has discrete states in which it is said to exist
at each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language
being parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the
grammar rules. *Note The Bison Parser Algorithm: Algorithm.
Generalized LR (GLR)
A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars,
including those that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that
Bison's deterministic parsing algorithm cannot by effectively
splitting off multiple parsers, trying all possible parsers, and
discarding those that fail in the light of additional right
context. *Note Generalized LR Parsing: Generalized LR Parsing.
Grouping
A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C. *Note Languages
and Context-Free Grammars: Language and Grammar.
IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is,
given any context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables
with the full language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but
with nearly the same number of parser states as LALR(1). This
reduction in parser states is often an order of magnitude. More
importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s extra parser states may
contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1) grammars, the
number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of
developing a grammar. *Note LR Table Construction::.
Infix operator
An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on
which it performs some operation.
Input stream
A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
LAC (Lookahead Correction)
A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default
reductions, and the use of `%nonassoc'. Delayed syntax error
detection results in unexpected semantic actions, initiation of
error recovery in the wrong syntactic context, and an incorrect
list of expected tokens in a verbose syntax error message. *Note
LAC::.
Language construct
One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example,
one of the constructs of the C language is the `if' statement.
*Note Languages and Context-Free Grammars: Language and Grammar.
Left associativity
Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to
right: `a+b+c' first computes `a+b' and then combines with `c'.
*Note Operator Precedence: Precedence.
Left recursion
A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
example, `expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;'. *Note Recursive Rules:
Recursion.
Left-to-right parsing
Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token
from left to right. *Note The Bison Parser Algorithm: Algorithm.
Lexical analyzer (scanner)
A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by
one. *Note The Lexical Analyzer Function `yylex': Lexical.
Lexical tie-in
A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
tokens are parsed. *Note Lexical Tie-ins::.
Literal string token
A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. *Note
Symbols::.
Lookahead token
A token already read but not yet shifted. *Note Lookahead Tokens:
Lookahead.
LALR(1)
The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other
parser generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
*Note Mysterious Conflicts::.
LR(1)
The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of
input.
Nonterminal symbol
A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can be
expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
words, a construct that is not a token. *Note Symbols::.
Parser
A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by
analyzing the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it
from a lexical analyzer.
Postfix operator
An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon
which it performs some operation.
Reduction
Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. *Note The Bison Parser
Algorithm: Algorithm.
Reentrant
A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
number of times in parallel, without interference between the
various invocations. *Note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.
Reverse polish notation
A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
Right recursion
A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
example, `expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;'. *Note Recursive Rules:
Recursion.
Semantics
In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of each
statement. *Note Defining Language Semantics: Semantics.
Shift
A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
already-recognized rule. *Note The Bison Parser Algorithm:
Algorithm.
Single-character literal
A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
*Note From Formal Rules to Bison Input: Grammar in Bison.
Start symbol
The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance
in the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed
as the first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
*Note The Start-Symbol: Start Decl.
Symbol table
A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
information in repeated uses of a symbol. *Note Multi-function
Calc::.
Syntax error
An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to
invalid syntax. *Note Error Recovery::.
Token
A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol. The
input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
the lexical analyzer. *Note Symbols::.
Terminal symbol
A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a
token. *Note Languages and Context-Free Grammars: Language and
Grammar.
Unreachable state
A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of
transitions from the parser's start state. A state can become
unreachable during conflict resolution. *Note Unreachable
States::.
File: bison.info, Node: Copying This Manual, Next: Bibliography, Prev: Glossary, Up: Top
Appendix C Copying This Manual
******************************
Version 1.3, 3 November 2008
Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
`http://fsf.org/'
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
0. PREAMBLE
The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other
functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to
assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it,
with or without modifying it, either commercially or
noncommercially. Secondarily, this License preserves for the
author and publisher a way to get credit for their work, while not
being considered responsible for modifications made by others.
This License is a kind of "copyleft", which means that derivative
works of the document must themselves be free in the same sense.
It complements the GNU General Public License, which is a copyleft
license designed for free software.
We have designed this License in order to use it for manuals for
free software, because free software needs free documentation: a
free program should come with manuals providing the same freedoms
that the software does. But this License is not limited to
software manuals; it can be used for any textual work, regardless
of subject matter or whether it is published as a printed book.
We recommend this License principally for works whose purpose is
instruction or reference.
1. APPLICABILITY AND DEFINITIONS
This License applies to any manual or other work, in any medium,
that contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it
can be distributed under the terms of this License. Such a notice
grants a world-wide, royalty-free license, unlimited in duration,
to use that work under the conditions stated herein. The
"Document", below, refers to any such manual or work. Any member
of the public is a licensee, and is addressed as "you". You
accept the license if you copy, modify or distribute the work in a
way requiring permission under copyright law.
A "Modified Version" of the Document means any work containing the
Document or a portion of it, either copied verbatim, or with
modifications and/or translated into another language.
A "Secondary Section" is a named appendix or a front-matter section
of the Document that deals exclusively with the relationship of the
publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall
subject (or to related matters) and contains nothing that could
fall directly within that overall subject. (Thus, if the Document
is in part a textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not
explain any mathematics.) The relationship could be a matter of
historical connection with the subject or with related matters, or
of legal, commercial, philosophical, ethical or political position
regarding them.
The "Invariant Sections" are certain Secondary Sections whose
titles are designated, as being those of Invariant Sections, in
the notice that says that the Document is released under this
License. If a section does not fit the above definition of
Secondary then it is not allowed to be designated as Invariant.
The Document may contain zero Invariant Sections. If the Document
does not identify any Invariant Sections then there are none.
The "Cover Texts" are certain short passages of text that are
listed, as Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts, in the notice
that says that the Document is released under this License. A
Front-Cover Text may be at most 5 words, and a Back-Cover Text may
be at most 25 words.
A "Transparent" copy of the Document means a machine-readable copy,
represented in a format whose specification is available to the
general public, that is suitable for revising the document
straightforwardly with generic text editors or (for images
composed of pixels) generic paint programs or (for drawings) some
widely available drawing editor, and that is suitable for input to
text formatters or for automatic translation to a variety of
formats suitable for input to text formatters. A copy made in an
otherwise Transparent file format whose markup, or absence of
markup, has been arranged to thwart or discourage subsequent
modification by readers is not Transparent. An image format is
not Transparent if used for any substantial amount of text. A
copy that is not "Transparent" is called "Opaque".
Examples of suitable formats for Transparent copies include plain
ASCII without markup, Texinfo input format, LaTeX input format,
SGML or XML using a publicly available DTD, and
standard-conforming simple HTML, PostScript or PDF designed for
human modification. Examples of transparent image formats include
PNG, XCF and JPG. Opaque formats include proprietary formats that
can be read and edited only by proprietary word processors, SGML or
XML for which the DTD and/or processing tools are not generally
available, and the machine-generated HTML, PostScript or PDF
produced by some word processors for output purposes only.
The "Title Page" means, for a printed book, the title page itself,
plus such following pages as are needed to hold, legibly, the
material this License requires to appear in the title page. For
works in formats which do not have any title page as such, "Title
Page" means the text near the most prominent appearance of the
work's title, preceding the beginning of the body of the text.
The "publisher" means any person or entity that distributes copies
of the Document to the public.
A section "Entitled XYZ" means a named subunit of the Document
whose title either is precisely XYZ or contains XYZ in parentheses
following text that translates XYZ in another language. (Here XYZ
stands for a specific section name mentioned below, such as
"Acknowledgements", "Dedications", "Endorsements", or "History".)
To "Preserve the Title" of such a section when you modify the
Document means that it remains a section "Entitled XYZ" according
to this definition.
The Document may include Warranty Disclaimers next to the notice
which states that this License applies to the Document. These
Warranty Disclaimers are considered to be included by reference in
this License, but only as regards disclaiming warranties: any other
implication that these Warranty Disclaimers may have is void and
has no effect on the meaning of this License.
2. VERBATIM COPYING
You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either
commercially or noncommercially, provided that this License, the
copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License
applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you
add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this License. You
may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading
or further copying of the copies you make or distribute. However,
you may accept compensation in exchange for copies. If you
distribute a large enough number of copies you must also follow
the conditions in section 3.
You may also lend copies, under the same conditions stated above,
and you may publicly display copies.
3. COPYING IN QUANTITY
If you publish printed copies (or copies in media that commonly
have printed covers) of the Document, numbering more than 100, and
the Document's license notice requires Cover Texts, you must
enclose the copies in covers that carry, clearly and legibly, all
these Cover Texts: Front-Cover Texts on the front cover, and
Back-Cover Texts on the back cover. Both covers must also clearly
and legibly identify you as the publisher of these copies. The
front cover must present the full title with all words of the
title equally prominent and visible. You may add other material
on the covers in addition. Copying with changes limited to the
covers, as long as they preserve the title of the Document and
satisfy these conditions, can be treated as verbatim copying in
other respects.
If the required texts for either cover are too voluminous to fit
legibly, you should put the first ones listed (as many as fit
reasonably) on the actual cover, and continue the rest onto
adjacent pages.
If you publish or distribute Opaque copies of the Document
numbering more than 100, you must either include a
machine-readable Transparent copy along with each Opaque copy, or
state in or with each Opaque copy a computer-network location from
which the general network-using public has access to download
using public-standard network protocols a complete Transparent
copy of the Document, free of added material. If you use the
latter option, you must take reasonably prudent steps, when you
begin distribution of Opaque copies in quantity, to ensure that
this Transparent copy will remain thus accessible at the stated
location until at least one year after the last time you
distribute an Opaque copy (directly or through your agents or
retailers) of that edition to the public.
It is requested, but not required, that you contact the authors of
the Document well before redistributing any large number of
copies, to give them a chance to provide you with an updated
version of the Document.
4. MODIFICATIONS
You may copy and distribute a Modified Version of the Document
under the conditions of sections 2 and 3 above, provided that you
release the Modified Version under precisely this License, with
the Modified Version filling the role of the Document, thus
licensing distribution and modification of the Modified Version to
whoever possesses a copy of it. In addition, you must do these
things in the Modified Version:
A. Use in the Title Page (and on the covers, if any) a title
distinct from that of the Document, and from those of
previous versions (which should, if there were any, be listed
in the History section of the Document). You may use the
same title as a previous version if the original publisher of
that version gives permission.
B. List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or
entities responsible for authorship of the modifications in
the Modified Version, together with at least five of the
principal authors of the Document (all of its principal
authors, if it has fewer than five), unless they release you
from this requirement.
C. State on the Title page the name of the publisher of the
Modified Version, as the publisher.
D. Preserve all the copyright notices of the Document.
E. Add an appropriate copyright notice for your modifications
adjacent to the other copyright notices.
F. Include, immediately after the copyright notices, a license
notice giving the public permission to use the Modified
Version under the terms of this License, in the form shown in
the Addendum below.
G. Preserve in that license notice the full lists of Invariant
Sections and required Cover Texts given in the Document's
license notice.
H. Include an unaltered copy of this License.
I. Preserve the section Entitled "History", Preserve its Title,
and add to it an item stating at least the title, year, new
authors, and publisher of the Modified Version as given on
the Title Page. If there is no section Entitled "History" in
the Document, create one stating the title, year, authors,
and publisher of the Document as given on its Title Page,
then add an item describing the Modified Version as stated in
the previous sentence.
J. Preserve the network location, if any, given in the Document
for public access to a Transparent copy of the Document, and
likewise the network locations given in the Document for
previous versions it was based on. These may be placed in
the "History" section. You may omit a network location for a
work that was published at least four years before the
Document itself, or if the original publisher of the version
it refers to gives permission.
K. For any section Entitled "Acknowledgements" or "Dedications",
Preserve the Title of the section, and preserve in the
section all the substance and tone of each of the contributor
acknowledgements and/or dedications given therein.
L. Preserve all the Invariant Sections of the Document,
unaltered in their text and in their titles. Section numbers
or the equivalent are not considered part of the section
titles.
M. Delete any section Entitled "Endorsements". Such a section
may not be included in the Modified Version.
N. Do not retitle any existing section to be Entitled
"Endorsements" or to conflict in title with any Invariant
Section.
O. Preserve any Warranty Disclaimers.
If the Modified Version includes new front-matter sections or
appendices that qualify as Secondary Sections and contain no
material copied from the Document, you may at your option
designate some or all of these sections as invariant. To do this,
add their titles to the list of Invariant Sections in the Modified
Version's license notice. These titles must be distinct from any
other section titles.
You may add a section Entitled "Endorsements", provided it contains
nothing but endorsements of your Modified Version by various
parties--for example, statements of peer review or that the text
has been approved by an organization as the authoritative
definition of a standard.
You may add a passage of up to five words as a Front-Cover Text,
and a passage of up to 25 words as a Back-Cover Text, to the end
of the list of Cover Texts in the Modified Version. Only one
passage of Front-Cover Text and one of Back-Cover Text may be
added by (or through arrangements made by) any one entity. If the
Document already includes a cover text for the same cover,
previously added by you or by arrangement made by the same entity
you are acting on behalf of, you may not add another; but you may
replace the old one, on explicit permission from the previous
publisher that added the old one.
The author(s) and publisher(s) of the Document do not by this
License give permission to use their names for publicity for or to
assert or imply endorsement of any Modified Version.
5. COMBINING DOCUMENTS
You may combine the Document with other documents released under
this License, under the terms defined in section 4 above for
modified versions, provided that you include in the combination
all of the Invariant Sections of all of the original documents,
unmodified, and list them all as Invariant Sections of your
combined work in its license notice, and that you preserve all
their Warranty Disclaimers.
The combined work need only contain one copy of this License, and
multiple identical Invariant Sections may be replaced with a single
copy. If there are multiple Invariant Sections with the same name
but different contents, make the title of each such section unique
by adding at the end of it, in parentheses, the name of the
original author or publisher of that section if known, or else a
unique number. Make the same adjustment to the section titles in
the list of Invariant Sections in the license notice of the
combined work.
In the combination, you must combine any sections Entitled
"History" in the various original documents, forming one section
Entitled "History"; likewise combine any sections Entitled
"Acknowledgements", and any sections Entitled "Dedications". You
must delete all sections Entitled "Endorsements."
6. COLLECTIONS OF DOCUMENTS
You may make a collection consisting of the Document and other
documents released under this License, and replace the individual
copies of this License in the various documents with a single copy
that is included in the collection, provided that you follow the
rules of this License for verbatim copying of each of the
documents in all other respects.
You may extract a single document from such a collection, and
distribute it individually under this License, provided you insert
a copy of this License into the extracted document, and follow
this License in all other respects regarding verbatim copying of
that document.
7. AGGREGATION WITH INDEPENDENT WORKS
A compilation of the Document or its derivatives with other
separate and independent documents or works, in or on a volume of
a storage or distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the
copyright resulting from the compilation is not used to limit the
legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual
works permit. When the Document is included in an aggregate, this
License does not apply to the other works in the aggregate which
are not themselves derivative works of the Document.
If the Cover Text requirement of section 3 is applicable to these
copies of the Document, then if the Document is less than one half
of the entire aggregate, the Document's Cover Texts may be placed
on covers that bracket the Document within the aggregate, or the
electronic equivalent of covers if the Document is in electronic
form. Otherwise they must appear on printed covers that bracket
the whole aggregate.
8. TRANSLATION
Translation is considered a kind of modification, so you may
distribute translations of the Document under the terms of section
4. Replacing Invariant Sections with translations requires special
permission from their copyright holders, but you may include
translations of some or all Invariant Sections in addition to the
original versions of these Invariant Sections. You may include a
translation of this License, and all the license notices in the
Document, and any Warranty Disclaimers, provided that you also
include the original English version of this License and the
original versions of those notices and disclaimers. In case of a
disagreement between the translation and the original version of
this License or a notice or disclaimer, the original version will
prevail.
If a section in the Document is Entitled "Acknowledgements",
"Dedications", or "History", the requirement (section 4) to
Preserve its Title (section 1) will typically require changing the
actual title.
9. TERMINATION
You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Document
except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt
otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute it is void,
and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your
license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a)
provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly
and finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the
copyright holder fails to notify you of the violation by some
reasonable means prior to 60 days after the cessation.
Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is
reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the
violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have
received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from
that copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days
after your receipt of the notice.
Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate
the licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from
you under this License. If your rights have been terminated and
not permanently reinstated, receipt of a copy of some or all of
the same material does not give you any rights to use it.
10. FUTURE REVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation may publish new, revised versions of
the GNU Free Documentation License from time to time. Such new
versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may
differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. See
`http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/'.
Each version of the License is given a distinguishing version
number. If the Document specifies that a particular numbered
version of this License "or any later version" applies to it, you
have the option of following the terms and conditions either of
that specified version or of any later version that has been
published (not as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation. If
the Document does not specify a version number of this License,
you may choose any version ever published (not as a draft) by the
Free Software Foundation. If the Document specifies that a proxy
can decide which future versions of this License can be used, that
proxy's public statement of acceptance of a version permanently
authorizes you to choose that version for the Document.
11. RELICENSING
"Massive Multiauthor Collaboration Site" (or "MMC Site") means any
World Wide Web server that publishes copyrightable works and also
provides prominent facilities for anybody to edit those works. A
public wiki that anybody can edit is an example of such a server.
A "Massive Multiauthor Collaboration" (or "MMC") contained in the
site means any set of copyrightable works thus published on the MMC
site.
"CC-BY-SA" means the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
license published by Creative Commons Corporation, a not-for-profit
corporation with a principal place of business in San Francisco,
California, as well as future copyleft versions of that license
published by that same organization.
"Incorporate" means to publish or republish a Document, in whole or
in part, as part of another Document.
An MMC is "eligible for relicensing" if it is licensed under this
License, and if all works that were first published under this
License somewhere other than this MMC, and subsequently
incorporated in whole or in part into the MMC, (1) had no cover
texts or invariant sections, and (2) were thus incorporated prior
to November 1, 2008.
The operator of an MMC Site may republish an MMC contained in the
site under CC-BY-SA on the same site at any time before August 1,
2009, provided the MMC is eligible for relicensing.
ADDENDUM: How to use this License for your documents
====================================================
To use this License in a document you have written, include a copy of
the License in the document and put the following copyright and license
notices just after the title page:
Copyright (C) YEAR YOUR NAME.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU
Free Documentation License''.
If you have Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts and Back-Cover
Texts, replace the "with...Texts." line with this:
with the Invariant Sections being LIST THEIR TITLES, with
the Front-Cover Texts being LIST, and with the Back-Cover Texts
being LIST.
If you have Invariant Sections without Cover Texts, or some other
combination of the three, merge those two alternatives to suit the
situation.
If your document contains nontrivial examples of program code, we
recommend releasing these examples in parallel under your choice of
free software license, such as the GNU General Public License, to
permit their use in free software.
File: bison.info, Node: Bibliography, Next: Index of Terms, Prev: Copying This Manual, Up: Top
Bibliography
************
[Denny 2008]
Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser
Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in
`Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing'
(SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 240-245.
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747'
[Denny 2010 May]
Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation,
Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
`http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD'
[Denny 2010 November]
Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for
Generating Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with
Conflict Resolution, in `Science of Computer Programming', Vol.
75, Issue 11 (November 2010), pp. 943-979.
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001'
[DeRemer 1982]
Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
Look-Ahead Sets, in `ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
Systems', Vol. 4, No. 4 (October 1982), pp. 615-649.
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187'
[Knuth 1965]
Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to
Right, in `Information and Control', Vol. 8, Issue 6 (December
1965), pp. 607-639.
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2'
[Scott 2000]
Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
`Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers', Royal Holloway, University
of London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December
2000).
`http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps'
File: bison.info, Node: Index of Terms, Prev: Bibliography, Up: Top
Index of Terms
**************
[index ]
* Menu:
* $ <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 25)
* $ <2>: Java Action Features.
(line 13)
* $ <3>: Table of Symbols. (line 39)
* $ <4>: Action Features. (line 14)
* $: Table of Symbols. (line 34)
* $$ <1>: Java Action Features.
(line 21)
* $$ <2>: Action Features. (line 10)
* $$ <3>: Table of Symbols. (line 30)
* $$: Actions. (line 6)
* $< <1>: Java Action Features.
(line 17)
* $< <2>: Action Features. (line 18)
* $<: Java Action Features.
(line 29)
* $@N: Mid-Rule Action Translation.
(line 6)
* $[NAME]: Actions. (line 6)
* $accept: Table of Symbols. (line 86)
* $end: Table of Symbols. (line 124)
* $N: Actions. (line 6)
* $NAME: Actions. (line 6)
* $undefined: Table of Symbols. (line 245)
* % <1>: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 53)
* %: Table of Symbols. (line 48)
* %% <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 43)
* %%: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 49)
* %code <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 92)
* %code <2>: %code Summary. (line 6)
* %code <3>: Calc++ Parser. (line 65)
* %code <4>: Prologue Alternatives.
(line 6)
* %code <5>: Decl Summary. (line 46)
* %code <6>: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 37)
* %code <7>: Table of Symbols. (line 91)
* %code: Decl Summary. (line 47)
* %code imports <1>: %code Summary. (line 83)
* %code imports: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 41)
* %code lexer: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 45)
* %code provides <1>: %code Summary. (line 55)
* %code provides <2>: Prologue Alternatives.
(line 6)
* %code provides: Decl Summary. (line 95)
* %code requires <1>: Decl Summary. (line 95)
* %code requires <2>: %code Summary. (line 41)
* %code requires <3>: Calc++ Parser. (line 17)
* %code requires: Prologue Alternatives.
(line 6)
* %code top <1>: Prologue Alternatives.
(line 6)
* %code top: %code Summary. (line 67)
* %debug <1>: Decl Summary. (line 52)
* %debug <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 97)
* %debug: Enabling Traces. (line 28)
* %define <1>: %define Summary. (line 16)
* %define <2>: Decl Summary. (line 59)
* %define <3>: Table of Symbols. (line 100)
* %define <4>: Decl Summary. (line 60)
* %define: %define Summary. (line 14)
* %define abstract: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 57)
* %define api.location.type <1>: %define Summary. (line 49)
* %define api.location.type <2>: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 78)
* %define api.location.type: User Defined Location Type.
(line 6)
* %define api.position.type: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 92)
* %define api.prefix: %define Summary. (line 62)
* %define api.pure <1>: Pure Decl. (line 6)
* %define api.pure: %define Summary. (line 75)
* %define api.push-pull <1>: Push Decl. (line 6)
* %define api.push-pull: %define Summary. (line 115)
* %define extends: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 61)
* %define final: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 65)
* %define implements: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 69)
* %define lex_throws: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 73)
* %define lr.default-reductions <1>: %define Summary. (line 128)
* %define lr.default-reductions: Default Reductions. (line 6)
* %define lr.keep-unreachable-states <1>: Unreachable States. (line 6)
* %define lr.keep-unreachable-states <2>: %define Summary. (line 145)
* %define lr.keep-unreachable-states: Unreachable States. (line 17)
* %define lr.type <1>: LR Table Construction.
(line 6)
* %define lr.type <2>: %define Summary. (line 156)
* %define lr.type: LR Table Construction.
(line 24)
* %define namespace <1>: %define Summary. (line 168)
* %define namespace: C++ Bison Interface. (line 10)
* %define package: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 84)
* %define parse.lac <1>: %define Summary. (line 208)
* %define parse.lac: LAC. (line 29)
* %define parser_class_name: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 88)
* %define public: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 97)
* %define strictfp: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 105)
* %define stype: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 101)
* %define throws: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 109)
* %defines <1>: Decl Summary. (line 113)
* %defines: Table of Symbols. (line 110)
* %destructor <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 114)
* %destructor <2>: Destructor Decl. (line 22)
* %destructor <3>: Using Mid-Rule Actions.
(line 76)
* %destructor <4>: Destructor Decl. (line 6)
* %destructor <5>: Decl Summary. (line 116)
* %destructor: Destructor Decl. (line 22)
* %dprec <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 119)
* %dprec: Merging GLR Parses. (line 6)
* %error-verbose <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 138)
* %error-verbose: Error Reporting. (line 17)
* %expect <1>: Expect Decl. (line 6)
* %expect: Decl Summary. (line 38)
* %expect-rr <1>: Simple GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* %expect-rr: Expect Decl. (line 6)
* %file-prefix <1>: Decl Summary. (line 121)
* %file-prefix: Table of Symbols. (line 142)
* %glr-parser <1>: Simple GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* %glr-parser <2>: GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* %glr-parser: Table of Symbols. (line 146)
* %initial-action <1>: Initial Action Decl. (line 11)
* %initial-action <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 150)
* %initial-action: Initial Action Decl. (line 6)
* %language <1>: Decl Summary. (line 125)
* %language: Table of Symbols. (line 154)
* %language "Java": Java Declarations Summary.
(line 10)
* %left <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 158)
* %left <2>: Decl Summary. (line 21)
* %left: Using Precedence. (line 6)
* %lex-param <1>: Pure Calling. (line 31)
* %lex-param <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 162)
* %lex-param: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 13)
* %locations: Decl Summary. (line 131)
* %merge <1>: Merging GLR Parses. (line 6)
* %merge: Table of Symbols. (line 167)
* %name-prefix <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 174)
* %name-prefix: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 19)
* %no-lines <1>: Decl Summary. (line 138)
* %no-lines: Table of Symbols. (line 191)
* %nonassoc <1>: Decl Summary. (line 25)
* %nonassoc <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 195)
* %nonassoc <3>: LR Table Construction.
(line 103)
* %nonassoc <4>: Using Precedence. (line 6)
* %nonassoc: Default Reductions. (line 6)
* %output <1>: Decl Summary. (line 147)
* %output: Table of Symbols. (line 199)
* %parse-param <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 203)
* %parse-param <2>: Parser Function. (line 36)
* %parse-param <3>: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 24)
* %parse-param: Parser Function. (line 36)
* %prec <1>: Contextual Precedence.
(line 6)
* %prec: Table of Symbols. (line 208)
* %printer: Printer Decl. (line 6)
* %pure-parser <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 212)
* %pure-parser: Decl Summary. (line 150)
* %require <1>: Decl Summary. (line 155)
* %require <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 217)
* %require: Require Decl. (line 6)
* %right <1>: Decl Summary. (line 17)
* %right <2>: Using Precedence. (line 6)
* %right: Table of Symbols. (line 221)
* %skeleton <1>: Decl Summary. (line 159)
* %skeleton: Table of Symbols. (line 225)
* %start <1>: Start Decl. (line 6)
* %start <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 229)
* %start: Decl Summary. (line 34)
* %token <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 233)
* %token <2>: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 29)
* %token <3>: Token Decl. (line 6)
* %token: Decl Summary. (line 13)
* %token-table <1>: Decl Summary. (line 167)
* %token-table: Table of Symbols. (line 237)
* %type <1>: Type Decl. (line 6)
* %type <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 241)
* %type <3>: Java Declarations Summary.
(line 33)
* %type: Decl Summary. (line 30)
* %union <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 250)
* %union <2>: Decl Summary. (line 9)
* %union: Union Decl. (line 6)
* %verbose: Decl Summary. (line 200)
* %yacc: Decl Summary. (line 206)
* /*: Table of Symbols. (line 53)
* /* ... */: Grammar Outline. (line 6)
* //: Table of Symbols. (line 54)
* // ...: Grammar Outline. (line 6)
* :: Table of Symbols. (line 57)
* ;: Table of Symbols. (line 61)
* <*> <1>: Printer Decl. (line 6)
* <*> <2>: Destructor Decl. (line 6)
* <*>: Table of Symbols. (line 68)
* <> <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 77)
* <> <2>: Printer Decl. (line 6)
* <>: Destructor Decl. (line 6)
* @$ <1>: Action Features. (line 98)
* @$ <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 7)
* @$ <3>: Actions and Locations.
(line 6)
* @$: Java Action Features.
(line 39)
* @[: Table of Symbols. (line 21)
* @[NAME]: Actions and Locations.
(line 6)
* @N <1>: Action Features. (line 104)
* @N <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 12)
* @N <3>: Action Features. (line 104)
* @N <4>: Actions and Locations.
(line 6)
* @N <5>: Mid-Rule Action Translation.
(line 6)
* @N: Java Action Features.
(line 35)
* @NAME <1>: Actions and Locations.
(line 6)
* @NAME: Table of Symbols. (line 20)
* abstract syntax tree: Implementing Gotos/Loops.
(line 17)
* accepting state: Understanding. (line 177)
* action: Actions. (line 6)
* action data types: Action Types. (line 6)
* action features summary: Action Features. (line 6)
* actions in mid-rule <1>: Mid-Rule Actions. (line 6)
* actions in mid-rule: Destructor Decl. (line 88)
* actions, location: Actions and Locations.
(line 6)
* actions, semantic: Semantic Actions. (line 6)
* additional C code section: Epilogue. (line 6)
* algorithm of parser: Algorithm. (line 6)
* ambiguous grammars <1>: Generalized LR Parsing.
(line 6)
* ambiguous grammars: Language and Grammar.
(line 34)
* associativity: Why Precedence. (line 34)
* AST: Implementing Gotos/Loops.
(line 17)
* Backus-Naur form: Language and Grammar.
(line 16)
* begin of Location: Java Location Values.
(line 21)
* begin of location: C++ location. (line 22)
* Bison declaration summary: Decl Summary. (line 6)
* Bison declarations: Declarations. (line 6)
* Bison declarations (introduction): Bison Declarations. (line 6)
* Bison grammar: Grammar in Bison. (line 6)
* Bison invocation: Invocation. (line 6)
* Bison parser: Bison Parser. (line 6)
* Bison parser algorithm: Algorithm. (line 6)
* Bison symbols, table of: Table of Symbols. (line 6)
* Bison utility: Bison Parser. (line 6)
* bison-i18n.m4: Internationalization.
(line 20)
* bison-po: Internationalization.
(line 6)
* BISON_I18N: Internationalization.
(line 27)
* BISON_LOCALEDIR: Internationalization.
(line 27)
* BNF: Language and Grammar.
(line 16)
* braced code: Rules. (line 29)
* C code, section for additional: Epilogue. (line 6)
* C-language interface: Interface. (line 6)
* calc: Infix Calc. (line 6)
* calculator, infix notation: Infix Calc. (line 6)
* calculator, location tracking: Location Tracking Calc.
(line 6)
* calculator, multi-function: Multi-function Calc. (line 6)
* calculator, simple: RPN Calc. (line 6)
* canonical LR <1>: Mysterious Conflicts.
(line 43)
* canonical LR: LR Table Construction.
(line 6)
* character token: Symbols. (line 37)
* column of position: C++ position. (line 29)
* columns on location: C++ location. (line 26)
* columns on position: C++ position. (line 32)
* comment: Grammar Outline. (line 6)
* compiling the parser: Rpcalc Compile. (line 6)
* conflicts <1>: Merging GLR Parses. (line 6)
* conflicts <2>: Shift/Reduce. (line 6)
* conflicts <3>: GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* conflicts: Simple GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* conflicts, reduce/reduce: Reduce/Reduce. (line 6)
* conflicts, suppressing warnings of: Expect Decl. (line 6)
* consistent states: Default Reductions. (line 17)
* context-dependent precedence: Contextual Precedence.
(line 6)
* context-free grammar: Language and Grammar.
(line 6)
* controlling function: Rpcalc Main. (line 6)
* core, item set: Understanding. (line 124)
* dangling else: Shift/Reduce. (line 6)
* data type of locations: Location Type. (line 6)
* data types in actions: Action Types. (line 6)
* data types of semantic values: Value Type. (line 6)
* debug_level on parser: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 42)
* debug_stream on parser: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 37)
* debugging: Tracing. (line 6)
* declaration summary: Decl Summary. (line 6)
* declarations: Prologue. (line 6)
* declarations section: Prologue. (line 6)
* declarations, Bison: Declarations. (line 6)
* declarations, Bison (introduction): Bison Declarations. (line 6)
* declaring literal string tokens: Token Decl. (line 6)
* declaring operator precedence: Precedence Decl. (line 6)
* declaring the start symbol: Start Decl. (line 6)
* declaring token type names: Token Decl. (line 6)
* declaring value types: Union Decl. (line 6)
* declaring value types, nonterminals: Type Decl. (line 6)
* default action: Actions. (line 62)
* default data type: Value Type. (line 6)
* default location type: Location Type. (line 6)
* default reductions: Default Reductions. (line 6)
* default stack limit: Memory Management. (line 30)
* default start symbol: Start Decl. (line 6)
* defaulted states: Default Reductions. (line 17)
* deferred semantic actions: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 6)
* defining language semantics: Semantics. (line 6)
* delayed syntax error detection <1>: Default Reductions. (line 43)
* delayed syntax error detection: LR Table Construction.
(line 103)
* delayed yylex invocations: Default Reductions. (line 17)
* discarded symbols: Destructor Decl. (line 98)
* discarded symbols, mid-rule actions: Using Mid-Rule Actions.
(line 76)
* dot: Graphviz. (line 6)
* else, dangling: Shift/Reduce. (line 6)
* end of Location: Java Location Values.
(line 22)
* end of location: C++ location. (line 23)
* epilogue: Epilogue. (line 6)
* error <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 128)
* error: Error Recovery. (line 20)
* error on parser: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 48)
* error recovery: Error Recovery. (line 6)
* error recovery, mid-rule actions: Using Mid-Rule Actions.
(line 76)
* error recovery, simple: Simple Error Recovery.
(line 6)
* error reporting function: Error Reporting. (line 6)
* error reporting routine: Rpcalc Error. (line 6)
* examples, simple: Examples. (line 6)
* exceptions: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 32)
* exercises: Exercises. (line 6)
* file format: Grammar Layout. (line 6)
* file of position: C++ position. (line 17)
* finite-state machine: Parser States. (line 6)
* formal grammar: Grammar in Bison. (line 6)
* format of grammar file: Grammar Layout. (line 6)
* freeing discarded symbols: Destructor Decl. (line 6)
* frequently asked questions: FAQ. (line 6)
* generalized LR (GLR) parsing <1>: Language and Grammar.
(line 34)
* generalized LR (GLR) parsing <2>: Generalized LR Parsing.
(line 6)
* generalized LR (GLR) parsing: GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars: Merging GLR Parses.
(line 6)
* generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars: Simple GLR Parsers.
(line 6)
* getDebugLevel on YYParser: Java Parser Interface.
(line 67)
* getDebugStream on YYParser: Java Parser Interface.
(line 62)
* getEndPos on Lexer: Java Scanner Interface.
(line 40)
* getLVal on Lexer: Java Scanner Interface.
(line 48)
* getStartPos on Lexer: Java Scanner Interface.
(line 39)
* gettext: Internationalization.
(line 6)
* glossary: Glossary. (line 6)
* GLR parsers and inline: Compiler Requirements.
(line 6)
* GLR parsers and yychar: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 10)
* GLR parsers and yyclearin: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 18)
* GLR parsers and YYERROR: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 28)
* GLR parsers and yylloc: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 10)
* GLR parsers and YYLLOC_DEFAULT: Location Default Action.
(line 6)
* GLR parsers and yylval: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 10)
* GLR parsing <1>: Generalized LR Parsing.
(line 6)
* GLR parsing <2>: GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* GLR parsing: Language and Grammar.
(line 34)
* GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars: Merging GLR Parses. (line 6)
* GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars: Simple GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* GLR with LALR: LR Table Construction.
(line 65)
* grammar file: Grammar Layout. (line 6)
* grammar rule syntax: Rules. (line 6)
* grammar rules section: Grammar Rules. (line 6)
* grammar, Bison: Grammar in Bison. (line 6)
* grammar, context-free: Language and Grammar.
(line 6)
* grouping, syntactic: Language and Grammar.
(line 48)
* Header guard: Decl Summary. (line 98)
* i18n: Internationalization.
(line 6)
* IELR <1>: LR Table Construction.
(line 6)
* IELR: Mysterious Conflicts.
(line 43)
* IELR grammars: Language and Grammar.
(line 22)
* infix notation calculator: Infix Calc. (line 6)
* initialize on location: C++ location. (line 19)
* initialize on position: C++ position. (line 14)
* inline: Compiler Requirements.
(line 6)
* interface: Interface. (line 6)
* internationalization: Internationalization.
(line 6)
* introduction: Introduction. (line 6)
* invoking Bison: Invocation. (line 6)
* item: Understanding. (line 102)
* item set core: Understanding. (line 124)
* kernel, item set: Understanding. (line 124)
* LAC <1>: LR Table Construction.
(line 103)
* LAC <2>: LAC. (line 6)
* LAC: Default Reductions. (line 54)
* LALR <1>: LR Table Construction.
(line 6)
* LALR: Mysterious Conflicts.
(line 31)
* LALR grammars: Language and Grammar.
(line 22)
* language semantics, defining: Semantics. (line 6)
* layout of Bison grammar: Grammar Layout. (line 6)
* left recursion: Recursion. (line 17)
* lex-param: Pure Calling. (line 31)
* lexical analyzer: Lexical. (line 6)
* lexical analyzer, purpose: Bison Parser. (line 6)
* lexical analyzer, writing: Rpcalc Lexer. (line 6)
* lexical tie-in: Lexical Tie-ins. (line 6)
* line of position: C++ position. (line 23)
* lines on location: C++ location. (line 27)
* lines on position: C++ position. (line 26)
* literal string token: Symbols. (line 59)
* literal token: Symbols. (line 37)
* location <1>: Locations. (line 6)
* location: Tracking Locations. (line 6)
* location actions: Actions and Locations.
(line 6)
* location on location: C++ location. (line 8)
* Location on Location: Java Location Values.
(line 25)
* location on location: C++ location. (line 12)
* location tracking calculator: Location Tracking Calc.
(line 6)
* location, textual <1>: Tracking Locations. (line 6)
* location, textual: Locations. (line 6)
* location_type: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 16)
* lookahead correction: LAC. (line 6)
* lookahead token: Lookahead. (line 6)
* LR: Mysterious Conflicts.
(line 31)
* LR grammars: Language and Grammar.
(line 22)
* ltcalc: Location Tracking Calc.
(line 6)
* main function in simple example: Rpcalc Main. (line 6)
* memory exhaustion: Memory Management. (line 6)
* memory management: Memory Management. (line 6)
* mfcalc: Multi-function Calc. (line 6)
* mid-rule actions <1>: Destructor Decl. (line 88)
* mid-rule actions: Mid-Rule Actions. (line 6)
* multi-function calculator: Multi-function Calc. (line 6)
* multicharacter literal: Symbols. (line 59)
* mutual recursion: Recursion. (line 34)
* Mysterious Conflict: LR Table Construction.
(line 6)
* Mysterious Conflicts: Mysterious Conflicts.
(line 6)
* named references: Named References. (line 6)
* NLS: Internationalization.
(line 6)
* nondeterministic parsing <1>: Language and Grammar.
(line 34)
* nondeterministic parsing: Generalized LR Parsing.
(line 6)
* nonterminal symbol: Symbols. (line 6)
* nonterminal, useless: Understanding. (line 48)
* operator precedence: Precedence. (line 6)
* operator precedence, declaring: Precedence Decl. (line 6)
* operator!= on location: C++ location. (line 39)
* operator!= on position: C++ position. (line 42)
* operator+ on location: C++ location. (line 31)
* operator+ on position: C++ position. (line 36)
* operator+= on location: C++ location. (line 32)
* operator+= on position: C++ position. (line 35)
* operator- on position: C++ position. (line 38)
* operator-= on position: C++ position. (line 37)
* operator<< <1>: C++ position. (line 46)
* operator<<: C++ location. (line 44)
* operator== on location: C++ location. (line 38)
* operator== on position: C++ position. (line 41)
* options for invoking Bison: Invocation. (line 6)
* overflow of parser stack: Memory Management. (line 6)
* parse error: Error Reporting. (line 6)
* parse on parser: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 30)
* parse on YYParser: Java Parser Interface.
(line 54)
* parser: Bison Parser. (line 6)
* parser on parser: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 26)
* parser stack: Algorithm. (line 6)
* parser stack overflow: Memory Management. (line 6)
* parser state: Parser States. (line 6)
* pointed rule: Understanding. (line 102)
* polish notation calculator: RPN Calc. (line 6)
* position on position: C++ position. (line 8)
* precedence declarations: Precedence Decl. (line 6)
* precedence of operators: Precedence. (line 6)
* precedence, context-dependent: Contextual Precedence.
(line 6)
* precedence, unary operator: Contextual Precedence.
(line 6)
* preventing warnings about conflicts: Expect Decl. (line 6)
* printing semantic values: Printer Decl. (line 6)
* Prologue <1>: %code Summary. (line 6)
* Prologue: Prologue. (line 6)
* Prologue Alternatives: Prologue Alternatives.
(line 6)
* pure parser: Pure Decl. (line 6)
* push parser: Push Decl. (line 6)
* questions: FAQ. (line 6)
* recovering: Java Action Features.
(line 55)
* recovering on YYParser: Java Parser Interface.
(line 58)
* recovery from errors: Error Recovery. (line 6)
* recursive rule: Recursion. (line 6)
* reduce/reduce conflict: Reduce/Reduce. (line 6)
* reduce/reduce conflicts <1>: Simple GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* reduce/reduce conflicts <2>: GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* reduce/reduce conflicts: Merging GLR Parses. (line 6)
* reduction: Algorithm. (line 6)
* reentrant parser: Pure Decl. (line 6)
* requiring a version of Bison: Require Decl. (line 6)
* reverse polish notation: RPN Calc. (line 6)
* right recursion: Recursion. (line 17)
* rpcalc: RPN Calc. (line 6)
* rule syntax: Rules. (line 6)
* rule, pointed: Understanding. (line 102)
* rule, useless: Understanding. (line 48)
* rules section for grammar: Grammar Rules. (line 6)
* running Bison (introduction): Rpcalc Generate. (line 6)
* semantic actions: Semantic Actions. (line 6)
* semantic value: Semantic Values. (line 6)
* semantic value type: Value Type. (line 6)
* semantic_type: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 15)
* set_debug_level on parser: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 43)
* set_debug_stream on parser: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 38)
* setDebugLevel on YYParser: Java Parser Interface.
(line 68)
* setDebugStream on YYParser: Java Parser Interface.
(line 63)
* shift/reduce conflicts <1>: Simple GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* shift/reduce conflicts <2>: GLR Parsers. (line 6)
* shift/reduce conflicts: Shift/Reduce. (line 6)
* shifting: Algorithm. (line 6)
* simple examples: Examples. (line 6)
* single-character literal: Symbols. (line 37)
* stack overflow: Memory Management. (line 6)
* stack, parser: Algorithm. (line 6)
* stages in using Bison: Stages. (line 6)
* start symbol: Language and Grammar.
(line 97)
* start symbol, declaring: Start Decl. (line 6)
* state (of parser): Parser States. (line 6)
* step on location: C++ location. (line 35)
* string token: Symbols. (line 59)
* summary, action features: Action Features. (line 6)
* summary, Bison declaration: Decl Summary. (line 6)
* suppressing conflict warnings: Expect Decl. (line 6)
* symbol: Symbols. (line 6)
* symbol table example: Mfcalc Symbol Table. (line 6)
* symbols (abstract): Language and Grammar.
(line 48)
* symbols in Bison, table of: Table of Symbols. (line 6)
* syntactic grouping: Language and Grammar.
(line 48)
* syntax error: Error Reporting. (line 6)
* syntax of grammar rules: Rules. (line 6)
* terminal symbol: Symbols. (line 6)
* textual location <1>: Tracking Locations. (line 6)
* textual location: Locations. (line 6)
* token <1>: Language and Grammar.
(line 48)
* token: C++ Parser Interface.
(line 19)
* token type: Symbols. (line 6)
* token type names, declaring: Token Decl. (line 6)
* token, useless: Understanding. (line 48)
* toString on Location: Java Location Values.
(line 32)
* tracing the parser: Tracing. (line 6)
* uint: C++ Location Values. (line 15)
* unary operator precedence: Contextual Precedence.
(line 6)
* unreachable states: Unreachable States. (line 6)
* useless nonterminal: Understanding. (line 48)
* useless rule: Understanding. (line 48)
* useless token: Understanding. (line 48)
* using Bison: Stages. (line 6)
* value type, semantic: Value Type. (line 6)
* value types, declaring: Union Decl. (line 6)
* value types, nonterminals, declaring: Type Decl. (line 6)
* value, semantic: Semantic Values. (line 6)
* version requirement: Require Decl. (line 6)
* warnings, preventing: Expect Decl. (line 6)
* writing a lexical analyzer: Rpcalc Lexer. (line 6)
* xml: Xml. (line 6)
* YYABORT <1>: Parser Function. (line 29)
* YYABORT <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 254)
* YYABORT <3>: Action Features. (line 28)
* YYABORT: Java Action Features.
(line 43)
* YYACCEPT <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 263)
* YYACCEPT <2>: Parser Function. (line 26)
* YYACCEPT <3>: Java Action Features.
(line 47)
* YYACCEPT <4>: Parser Function. (line 26)
* YYACCEPT: Action Features. (line 32)
* YYBACKUP <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 271)
* YYBACKUP: Action Features. (line 36)
* yychar <1>: Action Features. (line 69)
* yychar <2>: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 10)
* yychar <3>: Lookahead. (line 49)
* yychar: Table of Symbols. (line 275)
* yyclearin <1>: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 18)
* yyclearin <2>: Error Recovery. (line 99)
* yyclearin <3>: Action Features. (line 76)
* yyclearin: Table of Symbols. (line 281)
* YYDEBUG: Enabling Traces. (line 9)
* yydebug: Tracing. (line 6)
* YYDEBUG: Table of Symbols. (line 285)
* yydebug: Table of Symbols. (line 289)
* YYEMPTY: Action Features. (line 49)
* YYENABLE_NLS: Internationalization.
(line 27)
* YYEOF: Action Features. (line 52)
* yyerrok <1>: Action Features. (line 81)
* yyerrok <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 294)
* yyerrok: Error Recovery. (line 94)
* yyerror: Java Action Features.
(line 60)
* YYERROR <1>: Java Action Features.
(line 51)
* YYERROR: Action Features. (line 56)
* yyerror <1>: Error Reporting. (line 6)
* yyerror: Table of Symbols. (line 309)
* YYERROR <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 298)
* YYERROR: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 28)
* yyerror: Java Action Features.
(line 61)
* yyerror on Lexer: Java Scanner Interface.
(line 25)
* YYERROR_VERBOSE: Table of Symbols. (line 313)
* YYFPRINTF <1>: Enabling Traces. (line 36)
* YYFPRINTF: Table of Symbols. (line 321)
* YYINITDEPTH <1>: Memory Management. (line 32)
* YYINITDEPTH: Table of Symbols. (line 324)
* yylex <1>: Lexical. (line 6)
* yylex: Table of Symbols. (line 328)
* yylex on Lexer: Java Scanner Interface.
(line 31)
* yylex on parser: C++ Scanner Interface.
(line 13)
* YYLEX_PARAM: Table of Symbols. (line 333)
* yylloc <1>: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 10)
* yylloc <2>: Actions and Locations.
(line 67)
* yylloc <3>: Lookahead. (line 49)
* yylloc <4>: Action Features. (line 86)
* yylloc <5>: Table of Symbols. (line 339)
* yylloc: Token Locations. (line 6)
* YYLLOC_DEFAULT: Location Default Action.
(line 6)
* YYLTYPE <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 349)
* YYLTYPE: Token Locations. (line 19)
* yylval <1>: Token Values. (line 6)
* yylval <2>: Lookahead. (line 49)
* yylval <3>: Table of Symbols. (line 353)
* yylval <4>: Actions. (line 87)
* yylval <5>: GLR Semantic Actions.
(line 10)
* yylval: Action Features. (line 92)
* YYMAXDEPTH <1>: Memory Management. (line 14)
* YYMAXDEPTH: Table of Symbols. (line 361)
* yynerrs <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 365)
* yynerrs: Error Reporting. (line 69)
* yyoutput: Printer Decl. (line 16)
* yyparse <1>: Parser Function. (line 13)
* yyparse: Table of Symbols. (line 371)
* YYPARSE_PARAM: Table of Symbols. (line 409)
* YYParser on YYParser: Java Parser Interface.
(line 41)
* YYPRINT <1>: The YYPRINT Macro. (line 6)
* YYPRINT <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 375)
* YYPRINT: The YYPRINT Macro. (line 11)
* yypstate_delete <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 380)
* yypstate_delete: Parser Delete Function.
(line 15)
* yypstate_new <1>: Parser Create Function.
(line 15)
* yypstate_new <2>: Table of Symbols. (line 388)
* yypstate_new: Parser Create Function.
(line 6)
* yypull_parse <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 395)
* yypull_parse: Pull Parser Function.
(line 14)
* yypush_parse <1>: Table of Symbols. (line 402)
* yypush_parse: Push Parser Function.
(line 6)
* YYRECOVERING <1>: Error Recovery. (line 111)
* YYRECOVERING <2>: Action Features. (line 64)
* YYRECOVERING: Table of Symbols. (line 415)
* YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA: Table of Symbols. (line 420)
* YYSTYPE: Table of Symbols. (line 436)
* | <1>: Rules. (line 48)
* |: Table of Symbols. (line 64)
Tag Table:
Node: Top1060
Node: Introduction15110
Node: Conditions16781
Node: Copying18692
Node: Concepts56230
Node: Language and Grammar57422
Node: Grammar in Bison63357
Node: Semantic Values65271
Node: Semantic Actions67377
Node: GLR Parsers68551
Node: Simple GLR Parsers71296
Node: Merging GLR Parses77709
Node: GLR Semantic Actions82251
Node: Compiler Requirements84145
Node: Locations84897
Node: Bison Parser86350
Node: Stages89471
Node: Grammar Layout90759
Node: Examples92091
Node: RPN Calc93287
Node: Rpcalc Declarations94289
Node: Rpcalc Rules96217
Node: Rpcalc Input97950
Node: Rpcalc Line99421
Node: Rpcalc Expr100542
Node: Rpcalc Lexer102431
Node: Rpcalc Main105033
Node: Rpcalc Error105440
Node: Rpcalc Generate106473
Node: Rpcalc Compile107709
Node: Infix Calc108633
Node: Simple Error Recovery111347
Node: Location Tracking Calc113229
Node: Ltcalc Declarations113925
Node: Ltcalc Rules115014
Node: Ltcalc Lexer116879
Node: Multi-function Calc119202
Node: Mfcalc Declarations120778
Node: Mfcalc Rules122790
Node: Mfcalc Symbol Table124112
Node: Exercises130956
Node: Grammar File131470
Node: Grammar Outline132378
Node: Prologue133228
Node: Prologue Alternatives135032
Node: Bison Declarations144604
Node: Grammar Rules145032
Node: Epilogue145503
Node: Symbols146548
Node: Rules153623
Node: Recursion156043
Node: Semantics157718
Node: Value Type158826
Node: Multiple Types159661
Node: Actions160828
Node: Action Types164641
Node: Mid-Rule Actions165935
Node: Using Mid-Rule Actions166519
Node: Mid-Rule Action Translation170599
Node: Mid-Rule Conflicts172475
Node: Tracking Locations175101
Node: Location Type175765
Node: Actions and Locations176785
Node: Location Default Action179235
Node: Named References182733
Node: Declarations185369
Node: Require Decl187106
Node: Token Decl187425
Node: Precedence Decl189851
Node: Union Decl191861
Node: Type Decl193635
Node: Initial Action Decl194561
Node: Destructor Decl195347
Node: Printer Decl201012
Node: Expect Decl203308
Node: Start Decl205304
Node: Pure Decl205694
Node: Push Decl207449
Node: Decl Summary211940
Node: %define Summary220627
Node: %code Summary227657
Node: Multiple Parsers231375
Node: Interface234444
Node: Parser Function235762
Node: Push Parser Function238161
Node: Pull Parser Function238947
Node: Parser Create Function239596
Node: Parser Delete Function240416
Node: Lexical241183
Node: Calling Convention242626
Node: Token Values245601
Node: Token Locations246765
Node: Pure Calling247649
Node: Error Reporting249196
Node: Action Features252491
Node: Internationalization256792
Node: Algorithm259335
Node: Lookahead261765
Node: Shift/Reduce263942
Node: Precedence267119
Node: Why Precedence267837
Node: Using Precedence269673
Node: Precedence Examples270650
Node: How Precedence271167
Node: Non Operators272346
Node: Contextual Precedence273904
Node: Parser States275682
Node: Reduce/Reduce276926
Node: Mysterious Conflicts281576
Node: Tuning LR285082
Node: LR Table Construction286390
Node: Default Reductions292078
Node: LAC296912
Node: Unreachable States302464
Node: Generalized LR Parsing304455
Node: Memory Management308829
Node: Error Recovery311061
Node: Context Dependency316316
Node: Semantic Tokens317165
Node: Lexical Tie-ins320157
Node: Tie-in Recovery321595
Node: Debugging323689
Node: Understanding324928
Node: Graphviz335514
Node: Xml339875
Node: Tracing341593
Node: Enabling Traces342027
Node: Mfcalc Traces345489
Node: The YYPRINT Macro350761
Node: Invocation351924
Node: Bison Options353339
Node: Option Cross Key363832
Node: Yacc Library365755
Node: Other Languages366580
Node: C++ Parsers366907
Node: C++ Bison Interface367404
Node: C++ Semantic Values368793
Ref: C++ Semantic Values-Footnote-1369735
Node: C++ Location Values369888
Node: C++ position370813
Node: C++ location372689
Node: User Defined Location Type374445
Node: C++ Parser Interface375944
Node: C++ Scanner Interface378176
Node: A Complete C++ Example378877
Node: Calc++ --- C++ Calculator379819
Node: Calc++ Parsing Driver380333
Node: Calc++ Parser384114
Node: Calc++ Scanner387938
Node: Calc++ Top Level391463
Node: Java Parsers392119
Node: Java Bison Interface392796
Node: Java Semantic Values394847
Node: Java Location Values396461
Node: Java Parser Interface398017
Node: Java Scanner Interface401255
Node: Java Action Features403452
Node: Java Differences406075
Ref: Java Differences-Footnote-1408642
Node: Java Declarations Summary408792
Node: FAQ413114
Node: Memory Exhausted414061
Node: How Can I Reset the Parser414374
Node: Strings are Destroyed416915
Node: Implementing Gotos/Loops418588
Node: Multiple start-symbols419871
Node: Secure? Conform?421418
Node: I can't build Bison421866
Node: Where can I find help?422580
Node: Bug Reports423373
Node: More Languages424833
Node: Beta Testing425191
Node: Mailing Lists426065
Node: Table of Symbols426276
Node: Glossary443560
Node: Copying This Manual452564
Node: Bibliography477699
Node: Index of Terms479590
End Tag Table