<html>
<head>
<title>Dalvik Porting Guide</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Dalvik Porting Guide</h1>
<p>
The Dalvik virtual machine is intended to run on a variety of platforms.
The baseline system is expected to be a variant of UNIX (Linux, BSD, Mac
OS X) running the GNU C compiler. Little-endian CPUs have been exercised
the most heavily, but big-endian systems are explicitly supported.
</p><p>
There are two general categories of work: porting to a Linux system
with a previously unseen CPU architecture, and porting to a different
operating system. This document covers the former.
</p><p>
Basic familiarity with the Android platform, source code structure, and
build system is assumed.
</p>
<h2>Core Libraries</h2>
<p>
The native code in the core libraries (chiefly <code>dalvik/libcore</code>,
but also <code>dalvik/vm/native</code>) is written in C/C++ and is expected
to work without modification in a Linux environment. Much of the code
comes directly from the Apache Harmony project.
</p><p>
The core libraries pull in code from many other projects, including
OpenSSL, zlib, and ICU. These will also need to be ported before the VM
can be used.
</p>
<h2>JNI Call Bridge</h2>
<p>
Most of the Dalvik VM runtime is written in portable C. The one
non-portable component of the runtime is the JNI call bridge. Simply put,
this converts an array of integers into function arguments of various
types, and calls a function. This must be done according to the C calling
conventions for the platform. The task could be as simple as pushing all
of the arguments onto the stack, or involve complex rules for register
assignment and stack alignment.
</p><p>
To ease porting to new platforms, the <a href="http://sourceware.org/libffi/">
open-source FFI library</a> (Foreign Function Interface) is used when a
custom bridge is unavailable. FFI is not as fast as a native implementation,
and the optional performance improvements it does offer are not used, so
writing a replacement is a good first step.
</p><p>
The code lives in <code>dalvik/vm/arch/*</code>, with the FFI-based version
in the "generic" directory. There are two source files for each architecture.
One defines the call bridge itself:
</p><p><blockquote>
<code>void dvmPlatformInvoke(void* pEnv, ClassObject* clazz, int argInfo,
int argc, const u4* argv, const char* signature, void* func,
JValue* pReturn)</code>
</blockquote></p><p>
This will invoke a C/C++ function declared:
</p><p><blockquote>
<code>return_type func(JNIEnv* pEnv, Object* this [, <i>args</i>])<br></code>
</blockquote>or (for a "static" method):<blockquote>
<code>return_type func(JNIEnv* pEnv, ClassObject* clazz [, <i>args</i>])</code>
</blockquote></p><p>
The role of <code>dvmPlatformInvoke</code> is to convert the values in
<code>argv</code> into C-style calling conventions, call the method, and
then place the return type into <code>pReturn</code> (a union that holds
all of the basic JNI types). The code may use the method signature
(a DEX "shorty" signature, with one character for the return type and one
per argument) to determine how to handle the values.
</p><p>
The other source file involved here defines a 32-bit "hint". The hint
is computed when the method's class is loaded, and passed in as the
"argInfo" argument. The hint can be used to avoid scanning the ASCII
method signature for things like the return value, total argument size,
or inter-argument 64-bit alignment restrictions.
<h2>Interpreter</h2>
<p>
The Dalvik runtime includes two interpreters, labeled "portable" and "fast".
The portable interpreter is largely contained within a single C function,
and should compile on any system that supports gcc. (If you don't have gcc,
you may need to disable the "threaded" execution model, which relies on
gcc's "goto table" implementation; look for the THREADED_INTERP define.)
</p><p>
The fast interpreter uses hand-coded assembly fragments. If none are
available for the current architecture, the build system will create an
interpreter out of C "stubs". The resulting "all stubs" interpreter is
quite a bit slower than the portable interpreter, making "fast" something
of a misnomer.
</p><p>
The fast interpreter is enabled by default. On platforms without native
support, you may want to switch to the portable interpreter. This can
be controlled with the <code>dalvik.vm.execution-mode</code> system
property. For example, if you:
</p><p><blockquote>
<code>adb shell "echo dalvik.vm.execution-mode = int:portable >> /data/local.prop"</code>
</blockquote></p><p>
and reboot, the Android app framework will start the VM with the portable
interpreter enabled.
</p>
<h3>Mterp Interpreter Structure</h3>
<p>
There may be significant performance advantages to rewriting the
interpreter core in assembly language, using architecture-specific
optimizations. In Dalvik this can be done one instruction at a time.
</p><p>
The simplest way to implement an interpreter is to have a large "switch"
statement. After each instruction is handled, the interpreter returns to
the top of the loop, fetches the next instruction, and jumps to the
appropriate label.
</p><p>
An improvement on this is called "threaded" execution. The instruction
fetch and dispatch are included at the end of every instruction handler.
This makes the interpreter a little larger overall, but you get to avoid
the (potentially expensive) branch back to the top of the switch statement.
</p><p>
Dalvik mterp goes one step further, using a computed goto instead of a goto
table. Instead of looking up the address in a table, which requires an
extra memory fetch on every instruction, mterp multiplies the opcode number
by a fixed value. By default, each handler is allowed 64 bytes of space.
</p><p>
Not all handlers fit in 64 bytes. Those that don't can have subroutines
or simply continue on to additional code outside the basic space. Some of
this is handled automatically by Dalvik, but there's no portable way to detect
overflow of a 64-byte handler until the VM starts executing.
</p><p>
The choice of 64 bytes is somewhat arbitrary, but has worked out well for
ARM and x86.
</p><p>
In the course of development it's useful to have C and assembly
implementations of each handler, and be able to flip back and forth
between them when hunting problems down. In mterp this is relatively
straightforward. You can always see the files being fed to the compiler
and assembler for your platform by looking in the
<code>dalvik/vm/mterp/out</code> directory.
</p><p>
The interpreter sources live in <code>dalvik/vm/mterp</code>. If you
haven't yet, you should read <code>dalvik/vm/mterp/README.txt</code> now.
</p>
<h3>Getting Started With Mterp</h3>
</p><p>
Getting started:
<ol>
<li>Decide on the name of your architecture. For the sake of discussion,
let's call it <code>myarch</code>.
<li>Make a copy of <code>dalvik/vm/mterp/config-allstubs</code> to
<code>dalvik/vm/mterp/config-myarch</code>.
<li>Create a <code>dalvik/vm/mterp/myarch</code> directory to hold your
source files.
<li>Add <code>myarch</code> to the list in
<code>dalvik/vm/mterp/rebuild.sh</code>.
<li>Make sure <code>dalvik/vm/Android.mk</code> will find the files for
your architecture. If <code>$(TARGET_ARCH)</code> is configured this
will happen automatically.
</ol>
</p><p>
You now have the basic framework in place. Whenever you make a change, you
need to perform two steps: regenerate the mterp output, and build the
core VM library. (It's two steps because we didn't want the build system
to require Python 2.5. Which, incidentally, you need to have.)
<ol>
<li>In the <code>dalvik/vm/mterp</code> directory, regenerate the contents
of the files in <code>dalvik/vm/mterp/out</code> by executing
<code>./rebuild.sh</code>. Note there are two files, one in C and one
in assembly.
<li>In the <code>dalvik</code> directory, regenerate the
<code>libdvm.so</code> library with <code>mm</code>. You can also use
<code>make libdvm</code> from the top of the tree.
</ol>
</p><p>
This will leave you with an updated libdvm.so, which can be pushed out to
a device with <code>adb sync</code> or <code>adb push</code>. If you're
using the emulator, you need to add <code>make snod</code> (System image,
NO Dependency check) to rebuild the system image file. You should not
need to do a top-level "make" and rebuild the dependent binaries.
</p><p>
At this point you have an "all stubs" interpreter. You can see how it
works by examining <code>dalvik/vm/mterp/cstubs/entry.c</code>. The
code runs in a loop, pulling out the next opcode, and invoking the
handler through a function pointer. Each handler takes a "glue" argument
that contains all of the useful state.
</p><p>
Your goal is to replace the entry method, exit method, and each individual
instruction with custom implementations. The first thing you need to do
is create an entry function that calls the handler for the first instruction.
After that, the instructions chain together, so you don't need a loop.
(Look at the ARM or x86 implementation to see how they work.)
</p><p>
Once you have that, you need something to jump to. You can't branch
directly to the C stub because it's expecting to be called with a "glue"
argument and then return. We need a C stub "wrapper" that does the
setup and jumps directly to the next handler. We write this in assembly
and then add it to the config file definition.
</p><p>
To see how this works, create a file called
<code>dalvik/vm/mterp/myarch/stub.S</code> that contains one line:
<pre>
/* stub for ${opcode} */
</pre>
Then, in <code>dalvik/vm/mterp/config-myarch</code>, add this below the
<code>handler-size</code> directive:
<pre>
# source for the instruction table stub
asm-stub myarch/stub.S
</pre>
</p><p>
Regenerate the sources with <code>./rebuild.sh</code>, and take a look
inside <code>dalvik/vm/mterp/out/InterpAsm-myarch.S</code>. You should
see 256 copies of the stub function in a single large block after the
<code>dvmAsmInstructionStart</code> label. The <code>stub.S</code>
code will be used anywhere you don't provide an assembly implementation.
</p><p>
Note that each block begins with a <code>.balign 64</code> directive.
This is what pads each handler out to 64 bytes. Note also that the
<code>${opcode}</code> text changed into an opcode name, which should
be used to call the C implementation (<code>dvmMterp_${opcode}</code>).
</p><p>
The actual contents of <code>stub.S</code> are up to you to define.
See <code>entry.S</code> and <code>stub.S</code> in the <code>armv5te</code>
or <code>x86</code> directories for working examples.
</p><p>
If you're working on a variation of an existing architecture, you may be
able to use most of the existing code and just provide replacements for
a few instructions. Look at the <code>armv4t</code> implementation as
an example.
</p>
<h3>Replacing Stubs</h3>
<p>
There are roughly 230 Dalvik opcodes, including some that are inserted by
<a href="dexopt.html">dexopt</a> and aren't described in the
<a href="dalvik-bytecode.html">Dalvik bytecode</a> documentation. Each
one must perform the appropriate actions, fetch the next opcode, and
branch to the next handler. The actions performed by the assembly version
must exactly match those performed by the C version (in
<code>dalvik/vm/mterp/c/OP_*</code>).
</p><p>
It is possible to customize the set of "optimized" instructions for your
platform. This is possible because optimized DEX files are not expected
to work on multiple devices. Adding, removing, or redefining instructions
is beyond the scope of this document, and for simplicity it's best to stick
with the basic set defined by the portable interpreter.
</p><p>
Once you have written a handler that looks like it should work, add
it to the config file. For example, suppose we have a working version
of <code>OP_NOP</code>. For demonstration purposes, fake it for now by
putting this into <code>dalvik/vm/mterp/myarch/OP_NOP.S</code>:
<pre>
/* This is my NOP handler */
</pre>
</p><p>
Then, in the <code>op-start</code> section of <code>config-myarch</code>, add:
<pre>
op OP_NOP myarch
</pre>
</p><p>
This tells the generation script to use the assembly version from the
<code>myarch</code> directory instead of the C version from the <code>c</code>
directory.
</p><p>
Execute <code>./rebuild.sh</code>. Look at <code>InterpAsm-myarch.S</code>
and <code>InterpC-myarch.c</code> in the <code>out</code> directory. You
will see that the <code>OP_NOP</code> stub wrapper has been replaced with our
new code in the assembly file, and the C stub implementation is no longer
included.
</p><p>
As you implement instructions, the C version and corresponding stub wrapper
will disappear from the output files. Eventually you will have a 100%
assembly interpreter. You may find it saves a little time to examine
the output of your compiler for some of the operations. The
<a href="porting-proto.c.txt">porting-proto.c</a> sample code can be
helpful here.
</p>
<h3>Interpreter Switching</h3>
<p>
The Dalvik VM actually includes a third interpreter implementation: the debug
interpreter. This is a variation of the portable interpreter that includes
support for debugging and profiling.
</p><p>
When a debugger attaches, or a profiling feature is enabled, the VM
will switch interpreters at a convenient point. This is done at the
same time as the GC safe point check: on a backward branch, a method
return, or an exception throw. Similarly, when the debugger detaches
or profiling is discontinued, execution transfers back to the "fast" or
"portable" interpreter.
</p><p>
Your entry function needs to test the "entryPoint" value in the "glue"
pointer to determine where execution should begin. Your exit function
will need to return a boolean that indicates whether the interpreter is
exiting (because we reached the "bottom" of a thread stack) or wants to
switch to the other implementation.
</p><p>
See the <code>entry.S</code> file in <code>x86</code> or <code>armv5te</code>
for examples.
</p>
<h3>Testing</h3>
<p>
A number of VM tests can be found in <code>dalvik/tests</code>. The most
useful during interpreter development is <code>003-omnibus-opcodes</code>,
which tests many different instructions.
</p><p>
The basic invocation is:
<pre>
$ cd dalvik/tests
$ ./run-test 003
</pre>
</p><p>
This will run test 003 on an attached device or emulator. You can run
the test against your desktop VM by specifying <code>--reference</code>
if you suspect the test may be faulty. You can also use
<code>--portable</code> and <code>--fast</code> to explictly specify
one Dalvik interpreter or the other.
</p><p>
Some instructions are replaced by <code>dexopt</code>, notably when
"quickening" field accesses and method invocations. To ensure
that you are testing the basic form of the instruction, add the
<code>--no-optimize</code> option.
</p><p>
There is no in-built instruction tracing mechanism. If you want
to know for sure that your implementation of an opcode handler
is being used, the easiest approach is to insert a "printf"
call. For an example, look at <code>common_squeak</code> in
<code>dalvik/vm/mterp/armv5te/footer.S</code>.
</p><p>
At some point you need to ensure that debuggers and profiling work with
your interpreter. The easiest way to do this is to simply connect a
debugger or toggle profiling. (A future test suite may include some
tests for this.)
</p>
<p>
<address>Copyright © 2009 The Android Open Source Project</address>
</body>
</html>